Claim For An Accident At School

13 Oct 2020 | Sophie Davies
school children writing

Table of Contents

Make a School Accident Claim

Autumn is upon us and it’s the start of another academic year. With a 7-year-old boy recently being reported in the press as Britain’s youngest skydiver, traditionally risky activities are becoming increasingly accessible to children. But when it comes to school life, can children have a bit of rough and tumble in the playground or does our legal system wrap pupils in cotton wool, allowing the ‘compensation culture’ to cross the school gates? Victoria Gallanders investigates.

It’s a fact of life that children will sometimes get injured at school. For many adults, a grazed knee in the playground was just part and parcel of growing up, and the courts, too appreciate that children are bound to have some minor injuries when at school. However, sadly not all school injuries are minor. This was reinforced this month when the HSE fined a school in Boston £16,500 after a 16-year-old girl lost most of her fingers to burns sustained from plaster of Paris in an art lesson.

Three common scenarios when a school pupil may suffer injury through no fault of their own are when they are injured by another child who was insufficiently supervised, injured when using school equipment, or injured in poorly maintained grounds. Each of these situations is looked at in turn below:

Higher level of supervision for more risky activities

It is well established that schools and teachers should ensure pupils are safe. One aspect of this is supervising children to prevent them from injuring themselves and one another. The courts accept that children will need less supervision as they get older, except when participating in more risky activities requires a higher level of supervision. Similarly, as children get older, they are more aware of the consequences of their actions, with the result that even if poorly supervised, blame may be apportioned to the wrongdoing child themselves as well as the school.

So when will a school be liable for insufficiently supervising children? The answer is that there are no hard and fast rules for this and cases tend to turn on their facts. For example, in Palmer v Cornwall County Council (2009), a year 9 pupil was hit in the eye by a rock thrown by a fellow year 9 pupil during their lunch break. The accident occurred on school fields, and only one dinner lady supervised approximately 300 pupils from years 7 – 10. The Court of Appeal found that to have just one supervisor watching over the year 7 and 8 pupils and glancing at the year 9 and 10 pupils was negligent and the local authority was therefore ordered to pay compensation to the injured child. However, this is contrasted with Pettican v Enfield LBC (1970) where a child’s eye was poked by a piece of chalk when children were fooling around during indoor break time on a wet day. Although teachers had to supervise more than one classroom, the local authority was found not to be liable. Liability therefore depends on the individual circumstances of each case.

A school or local authority’s duty to supervise children can also extend to before and after the school day. For example, when children are waiting outside school for lessons to start and making their way home in the afternoon they can be particularly vulnerable to passing motorists. In July 2009 The Hackney Gazette reported an all too familiar story of a pupil who broke his shoulder and arm in a road traffic accident with a motorcyclist outside his school. Whilst liability for such accidents may sometimes lay with the motorist, schools and local authorities should also ensure that children are supervised appropriately outside the school gates.

Safety when using school equipment

Schools should also ensure that pupils are reasonably safe when using school equipment. Therefore, the school may be liable if a child is injured when using defective or unsuitable playground apparatus or sports equipment. Schools should make sure that play equipment is suitable for the ages of pupils at the school. So, for example, climbing frames should not be too high for younger children, and there should be soft tarmac or bark chippings below them to minimise injury if a child were to fall.

School equipment also covers desks, scissors, test tubes…in fact most school property which a child uses in the course of a school day. Again, when determining whether equipment is suitable, the court will look at a child’s age. For example, in Butt v Cambridgeshire and Ely CC (1970) a child was poked in the eye with scissors. The class was of 9 and 10 year olds and the local authority was not found liable. In contrast however, the local authority in Black v Kent City Council (1983) was found liable when a seven year old was poked in the eye by sharp scissors, as blunt ended scissors would have been more suitable for this age group. Therefore if a child is injured by unsuitable or faulty equipment, they may be entitled to compensation but again the case will turn on its facts.

Poorly maintained grounds

Finally, many school injuries result from trips, slips and falls. Under the Occupiers Liability Act 1957, schools must take reasonable care to ensure that pupils are reasonably safe when on school premises. This means that if they trip over a raised pavement slab, or a divot in a playing field, and the school had not acted reasonably in not spotting and remedying the defect, the child could be entitled to compensation. When considering what is reasonable, the courts accept that a child would not be expected to be as careful as an adult, and so there is a higher standard that schools must reach to escape liability.

If a pupil wanders into an area that is out of bounds and is, therefore a trespasser, the school could still be liable for an accident that occurs. This can pose a great concern to schools, as the courts have found occupiers liable for accidents caused by out-of-bounds premises such as skylights and fire escapes. However, the standard that the school must meet is much lower than when a pupil is allowed on the premises, and essentially they only have to protect pupils from dangers that they are aware of or should reasonably be aware of.

Therefore, the courts accept that sometimes pupils will suffer minor injuries at school, and they should not be smothered in cotton wool. However, this does not negate that children can be seriously injured under a school’s care and should therefore be protected. Whether a school is liable for an accident will largely depend on the case’s individual facts, and parents should therefore contact a lawyer as soon as possible if they feel that their child has a potential claim.

Share this article


Contact us today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    Related InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. strawberry pickers

      Strawberry Picker Receives £10,500 After Accident at Work

      Incident in the Strawberry Field Our client was at work, walking in the field and carrying cages with strawberries, when...

      Read more
    2. Accidente en almacén

      Accident at Work Compensation Examples

      Factory Worker Receives £14,000 for Hot Water Burns Our client was working in a food producing factory. He was injured when...

      Read more
    3. 13.2.2024

      5-figure Payout for Death of Hungarian Lorry Driver

      Siobhan McIvor, a Partner and Personal Injury lawyer, has successfully settled a fatal accident compensation claim on behalf of the...

      Read more
    4. accident at work claim

      Accident at work claim settled for Romanian driver

      Siobhan McIvor, a Partner in the Personal Injury Department, has successfully settled an accident at work claim arising from an...

      Read more
    5. blood clot work accident

      Compensation After Accident at Work Leads to Blood...

      Serious injury lawyer, Blanca Diego Casas recently represented an individual who suffered serious medical complications after sustaining an injury at...

      Read more
    6. Forklift truck accident claim settled

      Accident at work claim settled for Hungarian factory...

      Forklift trucks are a common cause of warehouse injury claims due to human error on the part of the forklift...

      Read more
    7. Tractor at work on a field

      £250,000 settlement for client injured in forklift accident

      Sophie Davies, a specialist personal injury lawyer at Osbornes Law, recently represented a client who suffered life-changing injuries following a...

      Read more
    8. shopping bags

      £100,000 settlement for tripping at work

      Osbornes Law secures £100,000 settlement for Hungarian woman who tripped over a shopping bag at work Siobhan McIvor, a Partner in...

      Read more
    9. factory worker

      £165,000 settlement for factory accident

      Siobhan McIvor, a Partner in the Personal Injury Department of Osbornes Law, has settled a £165,000 accident at work claim, with...

      Read more
    10. steak being cooked

      Kitchen Accident Claim

      Our client, a hospitality supervisor instructed Osbornes after he slipped and fell on oil and food debris on the floor...

      Read more
    11. 18.5.2021

      Construction Site Accident at Work

      Our client suffered numerous fractures to their left leg requiring surgery following a work accident on a construction site. He...

      Read more
    12. 18.5.2021

      Compensation for Amputation on Construction Site

      Our client worked as a carpenter/bricklayer on a building site at a residential property in North London. He was...

      Read more
    13. tractor

      Farming accidents high risk for self-employed

      Agriculture represents a dangerous industry in the UK, and according to the Health and Safety Executive’s report 2020/2021, farm deaths...

      Read more
    14. Accidente en almacén

      Fatal Accidents In The Workplace

      A new article from the BBC takes a looked at fatal accidents at work. The report states that since 1981, there...

      Read more
    15. accidente de construccion

      Lasting damage to ankle following construction accident settles...

      Sam Collard, a Partner in the Osbornes’ catastrophic injury team, recently settled a construction accident claim for a Romanian man...

      Read more
    16. injury at work

      Self-Employed Injury At Work

      Claim for an accident as a self-employed worker Being self-employed has advantages, including independence, creative freedom, job satisfaction and control...

      Read more
    17. accident at work injury

      Changes to employer’s liability for work accidents

      As it now stands employers are automatically liable for some workplace injuries, (without the Claimant having to prove “fault”) is...

      Read more
    18. building site

      Fatal Accident Conviction Highlights Health & Safety

      Conrad Sidebottom, 46, and Richard Golding, 43, were jailed for their part in causing the fatal injury of Anghel Milosavlevici. Osbornes Law...

      Read more