Vaginal (TVT) Mesh Claims

Claim Vaginal (TVT) Mesh Compensation

If you have undergone vaginal mesh treatment and feel that you may have suffered injury as a result, then please do not hesitate to contact our specialist medical negligence lawyers.

Contact us

Contact

  • “Osbornes, is described as having ‘superb judgement and a medical knowledge that is second to none.”

  • “Her level of detail in dealing with cases is forensic.”

Why was vaginal mesh surgery used?

A vaginal, TVT, or pelvic mesh is used to treat urogynaecological conditions for stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Stress incontinence is a very common condition for women after childbirth and at menopause, with around 20% of women suffering from this condition. Pelvic organ prolapse affects up to half of women who have had children and occurs when a pelvic organ (including the bladder, rectum or uterus) moves out of place. Commonly, this happens when the pelvic muscles are weakened or damaged.

Pelvic organ prolapse can be very life-limiting, making it difficult to use the toilet and causing painful symptoms in the vagina and loss of sensation—the mesh aimed to support weakened organs and repair damaged tissue.

Mesh was used in the UK from the mid-1990s. Data was produced to show that between April 2008 and March 2017, 100,516 patients had a tape insertion procedure for stress incontinence, and 27,016 patients underwent a mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. In the same period, 71,350 had a non-mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.

The initial trials indicated low rates of complication and high success rates. Still, the controversy started to build when there was a body of counter-evidence that mesh wasn’t as efficient as indicated and that there was a higher complication rate, with 1 in 15 women suffering complications warranting removal of the mesh by surgery.

Problems with TVT mesh surgery

There were several cases where patients suffered serious harm from surgery, including mesh erosion/extrusion, such as vaginal scarring, fistula formation, painful sex, bladder infection, bladder perforation, bowel and nerve trauma and chronic pain, usually in the pelvis, back and legs. It was thought to be one of the most shocking NHS scandals of its time, with one of the main complaints being a failure to inform patients of the risk. This included private patients as well as NHS patients.

Following calls from patients and senior professors against using mesh, The Independent and Medical Devices Safety Review recommended that doctors pause using mesh, which was implemented by the government in July 2018, pending a review. The review led by Baroness Julia Cumberlege and the IMMDS (Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety) report entitled First Do No Harm was published in July 2020, and the government finally responded in July 2021.

The review attracted immediate attention, and the NICE Guidelines for Urinary Incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Women: management was finally published on 2 April 2019, which is relied upon by medical professionals to date.

While mesh is not banned, it is recommended to be used as a last resort and under very strict supervision for exceptional cases.

Many patients continue to suffer debilitating conditions relating to mesh procedures. More recent statistics support that the rate of complications is as high as 1 in 6 patients.

Pelvic mesh risks are still being ignored

Notwithstanding the reports, reviews, and strict recommendations on how best to treat patients suffering from organ prolapse and stress incontinence, there are worrying reports projecting that the UK plans to become Europe’s key market for pelvic mesh within eight years. New research is being undertaken to support mesh products which are reported to fail to properly account for the risks and appear to exaggerate the benefits.

There are some excellent dedicated mesh online support groups available, with the most well-known website being https://slingthemesh.co.uk

Under English law, medical practitioners must act according to a reasonable body of medical opinion. They are liable under negligence law if they fall below this standard and cause patient loss or injury. Osbornes Law has represented patients in medical negligence actions against private doctors and NHS Trusts in relation to vaginal mesh products.

How to claim TVT mesh compensation

If you have undergone vaginal mesh treatment and feel that you may have suffered injury as a result, then please do not hesitate to contact partner and specialist medical negligence lawyer Stephanie Prior on stephanie.prior@osborneslaw.com or Jodi Newton, Senior Associate Solicitor, on jodi.newton@osborneslaw.com

Contact us about a TVT Mesh Claim

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you






    • “The team is very quick and efficient in responding."

      CHAMBERS UK 2023

    • "Obsbornes Law is always client-focused and works tirelessly to obtain the best outcomes for clients."

      CHAMBERS UK 2023

    • ‘They are ambitious for their clients and expect high standards from all who work with them.’

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Osbornes somehow combine the accessibility of a local firm, with the professional standards of a national or city outfit."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Osbornes, is described as having ‘superb judgement and a medical knowledge that is second to none."

      Legal 500 2023

    • Stephanie has developed a particularly strong reputation for her handling of birth injury claims, as well as cases concerning surgical negligence and delays in surgery.

      Chambers UK

    • "An excellent firm which achieves fantastic outcomes for clients."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie Prior takes on complex cases and gets excellent results. She has a background in medicine which serves her clients well and is a realistic but tough litigator."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie Prior is hugely dedicated, adored by her clients, tenacious, efficient and extremely knowledgeable."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie Prior is very good with troubled clients and is easily able to make them feel at ease."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie shows sensitivity and deals with things in an understanding way."

      Chambers UK 2021

    • Osbornes provides a very intimate and personal client service which is increasingly rare in this sector.

      Legal 500 2020 - Clinical Negligence

    • The lawyers in the team are highly experienced and will drive cases very hard on behalf of their clients.

      Legal 500 2020 - Clinical Negligence

    • "Stephanie Prior has a realistic attitude to the complexities of the cases. She wins the trust of her clients and goes the extra mile to ensure they get the best outcomes."

      Legal 500 2020 - Stephanie Prior

    • "Stephanie Prior... manages a varied caseload, including obstetric claims, child and adult brain injury cases and fatal and non-fatal spinal cord injury cases."

      Chambers UK

    • "Stephanie is experienced, knowledgeable of all aspects of clinical negligence work, and strategic in running cases."

      Chambers UK

    • "An exceptional outfit. They take on difficult cases, fight hard and win."

      Chambers UK

    • "The team were extremely professional in putting my needs first. There was a joined-up approach to catering for the client, and all lawyers involved were briefed and constructive."

      Chambers UK

    • Stephanie Prior is always very professional and kind. Highly recommended.

      Medical Negligence Client

    • Quite simply excellent, with a highly competent and well-rounded team. They understand complex medical litigation and have been our lifesavers, and we will always owe them our immense gratitude.

      Medical Negligence Client

    News & InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. hands of surgeon
      14.12.2022

      Successful settlement for negligent care during kidney transplant...

      Claimant v Royal Free London NHS Trust Osbornes have reached a settlement agreement on behalf of a Claimant who brought...

      Read more
    2. Female surgeon wearing surgical mask
      14.4.2022

      Severe abdominal pain prolonged due to failed surgery

      Jodi Newton was instructed in a claim against London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust where our client suffered serious...

      Read more
    3. Anatomy of Shoulder
      23.3.2022

      Nerve injury following bowel surgery

      Stephanie Prior was instructed in a claim against Luton & Dunstable University Hospital where our client sustained an injury to...

      Read more
    4. Shot of a doctor showing a patient some information
      25.1.2022

      Serious Injury Following TVT Surgery

      Case Summary Our client, SG, attended her GP in December 2015, complaining of urinary symptoms, including leaking when she laughed or...

      Read more
    5. 13.8.2019

      Claims Against Ian Paterson for Breast Surgery Errors

      Former Consultant surgeon Ian Patterson has been found guilty of 17 intentional wounding counts. In May this year he was sentenced...

      Read more
    6. 18.7.2017

      Calls for Public Inquiry into Vaginal Mesh Surgery

      A leading professor from the University of Oxford has called for a public inquiry into the use of vaginal mesh...

      Read more
    7. closeup of an eye
      12.11.2014

      When is Cataract Surgery Negligent?

      Preventing Cataract Surgery Negligence Losing your eyesight is a life-changing experience. When preparing for surgery to save your eyesight, you...

      Read more

    VIEW ALL

    Accreditations

    • Times best law firms 2023
    • scil logo
    • legal 500 leading firm
    • chambers logo