Serious Injury Following TVT Surgery25 Jan 2022 | Nicholas Leahy
Table of Contents
Our client, SG, attended her GP in December 2015, complaining of urinary symptoms, including leaking when she laughed or coughed. Her GP advised her to do pelvic floor exercises, and he referred her to the hospital to see a urogynaecological specialist.
SG was seen by the urogynaecologist at Eastbourne District General Hospital on 6 April 2016. The urogynaecologist thought that our client was suffering from mixed urge and stress incontinence and he made a referral for urodynamic studies in three months’ time. SG was diagnosed with a stage 1 cystocele and stage 1 rectocele. No demonstrable stress incontinence was found, but definite urethral hypermobility was noted, and the plan was for urodynamic studies to see if stress incontinence was demonstrated.
SG attended urodynamic studies on 27 May 2016, and these showed detrusor overactivity and urgency but importantly, did not show urodynamic stress incontinence. She was advised to start a prescription of Vesicare 5 mg to be increased to 10 mg later on for the next three months.
In November 2016 underwent uroflowmetry, which indicated a good detrusor muscle function. However, Vesicare had given her little benefit to her overactive bladder.
The urogynaecologist advised SG that there were two options for treating her incontinence; either tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery or an autologous fascial sling. He informed SG that TVT had a very high success rate and that this was the best option for her. He informed SG that it was a straightforward procedure to be carried out under a general anaesthetic as a day case. SG signed a consent form on that day which described this procedure as “to treat SI” [stress incontinence].
SG underwent the TVT procedure at Eastbourne District General Hospital on 22 March 2017. SG found that she could not move her left leg after surgery. She initially thought this was due to the anaesthetic. SG became worried when things did not improve, and the Consultant came to review her. He could not diagnose the precise cause, and SG was therefore admitted to a urology ward.
On the urology ward, a size 12 catheter was inserted, and SG was noted to void 800ml with a residual bladder volume of 400mls. There was no improvement in her left leg power or function. SG was advised to mobilise and was referred to physiotherapy. Over the following days, she did regain some power in the left limb but remained unable to bend her knee or hip. She was injected with 300mg of hydrocortisone to ease the nerve inflammation in her leg.
SG underwent a diagnostic MRI scan of her pelvis on 27 March 2017. Excessive oedema within the adductor muscle compartment was noted. No evidence of a recent hip dislocation and degeneration in the lower spine was observed. A review by a radiologist with a sub-speciality interest for further detail was suggested.
Removal of TVT
On 28 March 2017, the TVT tape insertion was removed, and a cystoscopy was performed, and a retropubic TVT was inserted at the same time. The same surgeon performed this as previously, who noted following the removal of the TVT that SG had made a complete recovery. However, this was not the case.
In April 2017, SG still had pain in her left leg, which started at her hip and radiated down her leg. SG was therefore referred to a neurologist and thereafter to the pain clinic.
The neurologist saw SG on 2 May 2017 and noted, “following the revision she managed to walk and improved from the motor perspective, but she has been left with residual tingling and numbness of the left thigh resembling meralgia paraethetica”. The neurologist thought the diagnosis was possibly neuropraxia, which he hoped would resolve with time. However, he referred SG on for nerve conduction studies/EMG.
In May 2017, SG was referred for physiotherapy because she still suffered from severe pain in her left leg.
SG underwent several investigations in 2017, which included an MRI scan, which showed degenerative changes at L5-S1 with loss of disc height at L5-S1 with end plate degenerative change. There was a broad-based disc bulge at this level with bilateral recess narrowing and narrowing of the exit foramina. However, there was no definite evidence of nerve root compression, and there was no significant spinal canal stenosis.
SG attended pain management and physiotherapy between 7th September 2017 and 1st March 2018 and underwent hydrotherapy. However, this did not relieve her symptoms. She continued to suffer constant severe pain down her left leg with the sensation of sandpaper rubbing her skin below the left knee.
In April 2018, SG’s hip and thigh pain was such that she could not work for one week or drive. On 25th April 2018, whilst standing in the kitchen, SG felt urine gushing down her legs this being the second occasion on which this had occurred in the past month. Her incontinence was ongoing and she suffered leaks and urgency daily. The pain would interrupt her sleep such that she became chronically tired and this, together with her incontinence, impaired her mood, her capacity for work and her family life.
SG instructed Nicholas Leahy, medical negligence specialist, to pursue a civil claim against East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust.
Supportive expert evidence was obtained from a Consultant Urogynaecologist (on breach of duty and causation) and a leading neurologist (on causation). The experts thought that SG’s symptoms were incorrectly diagnosed as stress urinary incontinence rather than detrusor overactivity and that, therefore, SG had been incorrectly advised to undergo TVT surgery. The correct treatment in SG’s case would have been medication, weight loss and/or Botox, notwithstanding her previous lack of response to Vesicare medication.
Further, the medical experts instructed by Osbornes were of the view that the performance of the surgery on 22nd March 2017 was substandard in that SG was positioned with such force in the lithotomy position and/or operated on in such a manner as to cause a permanent nerve injury to the left L3/4 nerve roots as they come away from the spinal cord.
Expert evidence was obtained commenting on causation. This enabled SG to argue that had she been treated correctly with medication for her overactive bladder, she would likely have been offered Botox treatment at 3-6 monthly intervals. It was, therefore, more likely than not that her overactive bladder would have been controlled, and she would have been continent of urine. Naturally, she also would have avoided the initial surgery and the revision surgery, which took place in March 2017.
A Letter of Claim was sent to the Defendant Trust in May 2019. However, liability was denied. The Defendant maintained that SG had been correctly diagnosed and that surgery was the appropriate option but that she had simply suffered a recognised complication of such surgery.
The parties were unable to reach any agreement, and so in March 2020 court proceedings were issued against the Defendant hospital trust. Laura Begley of 9 Gough Chambers, a barrister, was instructed to advise SG.
The court proceedings were served against the Defendant, together with Condition and Prognosis evidence which had been obtained from a Consultant Urogynaecologist and a Consultant Neurologist. However, the Defendant maintained their denial of liability, serving a complete Defence to the claim in April 2021 (various extensions of time had to be agreed due to the SARS-COV-2 pandemic).
SG’s case was then listed for a Costs and Case Management Conference. However, shortly before this was due to take place, and following a negotiation period, the parties agreed to a five-figure settlement of SG’s case.
The settlement will enable SG to access continued care with a specialist in urogynecology. SG can now obtain a trial of anticholinergic therapy in conjunction with bladder training from a specialist continence nurse to treat her urinary urgency and urge incontinence. She will also be able to access supervised pelvic floor therapy.
In relation to the ongoing pain in her left leg, the settlement will enable SG to undergo multidisciplinary pain management treatment. The medical management will include physical treatment, injection, talking, and pharmacological therapies, all supervised by a Consultant Neurologist.
Nicholas Leahy, Solicitor in the Clinical Negligence Department at Osbornes said:
“This was a very difficult claim in which complex issues relating to breach of duty and causation remained in dispute. However, with the help of quality expert evidence from some of the country’s leading medical practitioners, I am very pleased that we obtained a positive result for SG, who can now move on with her life and access the treatment she requires”.
"Nicholas Leahy works extremely hard and understands the commercial sensitivities of clinical negligence litigation."
Excellent service from Osbornes throughout on a difficult clinical negligence claim. Nicholas Leahy who handled the claim was responsive and professional throughout, while also providing pragmatic advice and clear drafting.
Working with Osbornes Law was the best decision I could have made. Nick was really attentive to my issue and did a very thorough job. He truly made the process headache free! Highly recommend them.
Nick Leahy has been my Solicitor throughout this journey and has been absolutely amazing; kind, approachable and extremely supportive... Through some dogged determination by Nick we achieved our goal without having to go to trial. I cannot thank Nick, Stephanie and all of the team at Osbornes highly enough for achieving a very favourable settlement, the outcome of which will make a huge difference to myself and my family.
Insights from Nicholas VIEW ALL
Delayed Pre-Eclampsia Diagnosis Resulting in Tragic Baby Loss
Introduction to the Case Nick Leahy, Associate in our Clinical Negligence department, has recently settled a birth injury claim against...Read more
Osbornes Instructed After Local Authority Data Breach
Osbornes Law has recently negotiated a settlement on behalf of two clients who had their personal information inadvertently released to...Read more
Court avoided after settlement agreed in dental negligence...
The Medical Negligence team have recently negotiated the settlement of a complex dental negligence case. Our client experienced a number...Read more
Delayed diagnosis of appendiceal cancer
The medical negligence team at Osbornes Law has recently settled a case involving a patient who passed away following a...Read more
Tragic Case Involving a Home Water Birth
Introduction to the case Nicholas Leahy is acting for a young woman who had a water birth at home and...Read more
Successful Claim Against King’s College Hospitals
The birth injury lawyers at Osbornes Law have recently negotiated the settlement of a case in which our client sustained...Read more
Serious Injury Following TVT Surgery
Case Summary Our client, SG, attended her GP in December 2015, complaining of urinary symptoms, including leaking when she laughed or...Read more
Court of Appeal Judgement on Secondary Victim Cases
Judgment was today handed down by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Foundation...Read more
Wrongful birth claim successfully settled
Background Our client, J, fell pregnant in October 2015 and took the difficult decision to undergo a termination. She booked an...Read more
Medical Negligence Case Study: Iron infusion cannula injury
Nick Leahy, Solicitor in Osbornes Clinical Negligence team recovered damages for his client who suffered an extravasation injury following an...Read more
Sepsis – greater awareness can lead to better outcomes
In September, I attended the Brain Injury Group’s Sepsis training event in the City of London with my colleague,...Read more
Osbornes represent family of NHS employee
Osbornes Law is representing the family of a former NHS employee who suffered a painful death due to negligent hospital...Read more
Osbornes Successfully Settle Wrongful Birth Claim
Nicholas Leahy, clinical negligence lawyer at Osbornes Law has recently negotiated the successful settlement of a wrongful birth case. Our...Read more
Family In Cardiac Negligence Claim Against NHS Trust
Nick Leahy, medical negligence solicitor at Osbornes Law was instructed to pursue a cardiac compensation claim on behalf of the...Read more
Legal Support For Bereaved Families
What legal support is available for bereaved families? The loss of a loved one is an extremely distressing time for...Read more
Stillbirth following water birth at home
Nicholas Leahy acted for a young woman who had a water birth at home and two midwives were allocated to...Read more
NHS Plans To Centralise Patient Medical Data Cause...
Recent news coverage has highlighted the growing concern over plans by NHS Digital (which runs the NHS’s IT system)...Read more
Failure to diagnose and treat Ogilvie’s syndrome
Our client suffered the consequences of a delayed diagnosis of Ogilvie’s syndrome following the birth of her daughter by...Read more
Failed to identify nerve damage caused during operation
The Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law have this week successfully negotiated the settlement of a case in which our...Read more
Elderly man dies after fall from hospital bed
A hospital trust has apologised after a vulnerable 84-year-old man died due to negligence after he fell out of bed...Read more
Why safety improvements for the placement of nasogastric...
This month, the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch launched an investigation looking at the implementation of safety improvements for the placement...Read more
Fatal Claim against West London NHS Trust
I recently acted in a fatal medical negligence claim against West London NHS Trust for damages under the Law Reform (...Read more
Bowel Cancer need not be a killer
Early diagnosis of bowel cancer is key. Cancer is a word that attracts stigma. Many people believe that if you...Read more