Court avoided after settlement agreed in dental negligence claim23 Jan 2023 | Nicholas Leahy
The Medical Negligence team have recently negotiated the settlement of a complex dental negligence case. Our client experienced a number of serious problems as a result of the negligence of two dentists, who were business partners at her local dental practice, as a result of which she avoidably lost two of her teeth prematurely. She was represented by Nicholas Leahy, one of our expert medical negligence lawyers.
Our client first visited the dental practice in August 2009. She knew both dentists personally and initially had a good relationship with them. She had annual appointments at this dentist, and had various treatments over the course of the next few years under both dentists, which mainly consisted of fillings but also root canal treatment at her UL6 tooth. Our client took good care of her oral health generally and had hygienist appointments regularly too.
In February 2021, she booked an appointment with her dentist as a filling on her UL7 tooth had fallen out. She was seen by one of the dental partners on 23 February 2021. He placed a temporary filling on the tooth and he advised her to book another appointment in one month’s time to have a permanent filling.
She booked this appointment, as advised, and attended on 25 March 2021. On this occasion, she felt as if the dentist was in a rush during the appointment. She was seen 40 minutes later than her appointment time and when she was seen, the dentist filled her UL7 tooth. Following this appointment, however, she continued to have problems at UL7. She had pain in the tooth and the entire gum area was affected. The tooth felt bruised and raised slightly and she was not able to eat on that side of her mouth. She arranged another appointment at the dentist and was seen on 31 March 2021 by the second dental partner, who was of the view that our client had a possible infection, and prescribed amoxicillin. She advised her to call the following day if the symptoms had not then eased. The symptoms did not improve and so our client attended once again on 1 April 2021. The dentist adjusted the bite at UL7 and advised Claimant to continue taking the antibiotics.
By April 2021, Claimant had become dissatisfied with the treatment which was being provided to her by the practice and so she booked an appointment with a new dentist at a different practice. She attended on 7 April 2021. This dentist was of the view that the pain at UL7 should settle but that she had an infection around her UL5 tooth and that this would need to be extracted. She was referred to an implant specialist who she saw on 13 April 2021.
Following a CBCT scan which she had at the above appointment, our client was informed that the root canal at her UL6 tooth was failing, and the tooth was unrestorable, as was her UL7 tooth. She was also informed that her UR6 tooth was unrestorable as a result of infection and that this would need to be treated with urgency to prevent the infection from spreading into her sinus canal.
Our client proceeded to have treatment under the care of the new dentist, which included extractions, bone grafts and implant placements. She successfully completed this treatment in early 2022.
Our client complained to the original dentists about the treatment she had received, however, they were not able to agree on the extent of any mistakes made or the damage which had been caused. She remained dissatisfied with the treatment received and therefore decided to consult solicitors to advise her on the prospects of a dental medical negligence case.
Medical Negligence Claim
Nicholas Leahy was instructed by Claimant in July 2021 to investigate a claim for dental negligence against her dentists.
Following initial investigations, expert evidence was obtained from a leading dental expert, Professor Chris Lynch. His report was supportive of Claimant’s case on breach of duty and causation in respect of both her UL6 and UL7 teeth. Professor Lynch was of the opinion that there had been a negligent failure to detect caries at our client’s UL6 tooth over a number of years by both dental partners, which had ultimately made that tooth unrestorable. Additionally, he was of the view that the root canal treatment which had been performed at that tooth was performed negligently, which also would have led to the avoidable loss of UL6. In relation to UL7, Professor Lynch was of the view that in March 2021, the first dentist had performed the filling at UL7 negligently, such that he had unnecessarily deepened the mesial box and created an unnecessarily deep margin. In relation to the UR6 tooth, the position was more nuanced. Professor Lynch felt that the root canal had again been performed negligently, however a reported crack line at the tooth prior to this treatment may have meant that the tooth had a nil prognosis in any event. Further investigation was needed in respect of this tooth.
Professor Lynch was of the view that in the absence of the negligence relating to both UL6 and UL7, our client would have retained both teeth with a lifetime prognosis. In relation to UR6, if it could be shown that the crack was innocuous, then a claim could be supported and the tooth would have been retained with a lifetime prognosis.
A Letter of Claim was sent to the now defendants in January 2022 who responded on 30 June 2022. In their Letter of Response, the Defendants made only limited admissions in respect of the UL6 and UL7 teeth. The defendants admitted that there had been a ten-month delay in the diagnosis of caries at UL6 between February and December 2012, which had led to the requirement for root canal at that tooth, and that there had been a requirement for a root canal at UL7 following the inadequate provision of a filling in March 2021. The defendants denied that UL6 and UR6 were avoidably lost, and argued that our client had failed to mitigate her loss by having UL7 extracted, rather than a root canal performed. The defendants made a low offer of settlement at the same time as their response.
Professor Lynch remained supportive of our client’s case in spite of the arguments raised by the defendants above. Further investigations were performed in respect of the UR6 tooth and on review of a CBCT scan of that tooth, it was found that on the balance of probabilities that tooth probably would have been unrestorable in any event, even absent the negligence. Professor Lynch was also instructed to examine our client for the purposes of a ‘Condition and Prognosis’ report and on the basis of this report, a Schedule of Loss and Damage was drafted and finalised, enabling us to value her claim.
A further letter was sent to the defendants in August 2022, reiterating our client’s case in respect of the UL6 and UL7 teeth. However, liability continued to remain substantially in dispute and correspondence was exchanged between the parties over the course of the following few months. Laura Hibberd, Counsel, of Deka Chambers in London was instructed to advise our client on her case and the likely value of the case in light of the arguments which were being advanced.
Frustratingly, in October 2022 the defendants made a time-limited offer of settlement, giving our client only 7 days within which to obtain our advice on this offer. After advice from Counsel and our medical expert, it was decided that this offer was too low, and it was rejected. The defendant then unexpectedly resiled from admissions they had made previously in respect of the UL7 tooth, and made a lower offer of settlement to our client.
In January 2023, we responded to the defendants, indicating that our client would maintain her position in respect of both teeth and that if matters could not be resolved imminently, then court proceedings would be issued without further notice. An offer of settlement was made to the defendants at the same time. This was rejected, however, shortly after that the defendants made an improved offer to our client, which she accepted prior to the commencement of court proceedings.
Commenting following the successful resolution of this case, Nicholas Leahy said:
“I am pleased that we were able to resolve this case without court proceedings, however, the defendants could have settled this matter at a much earlier stage by accepting fault and making a reasonable offer of settlement to our client. By prolonging the legal process, more stress was caused to my client. However, thanks to the brilliant and reliable expert evidence from Professor Lynch and Laura’s excellent advice in conference and tactically as the case progressed, we were able to resolve the matter in my client’s favour”
How Osbornes Law can help
Our medical negligence lawyers are ranked as leading lawyers in London by Chambers UK and The Legal 500. We are approved solicitors of Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA). This means we have demonstrated our specialist legal expertise and experience in running clinical negligence claims for patients.
To speak with Nicholas regarding a possible dental negligence or another medical negligence claim, please complete the online enquiry form below.
Share this article
Nicholas Leahy Solicitor
Contact Nicholas today
For a free initial conversation call 0207 485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
"Nicholas Leahy works extremely hard and understands the commercial sensitivities of clinical negligence litigation."
Excellent service from Osbornes throughout on a difficult clinical negligence claim. Nicholas Leahy who handled the claim was responsive and professional throughout, while also providing pragmatic advice and clear drafting.
Working with Osbornes Law was the best decision I could have made. Nick was really attentive to my issue and did a very thorough job. He truly made the process headache free! Highly recommend them.
Nick Leahy has been my Solicitor throughout this journey and has been absolutely amazing; kind, approachable and extremely supportive... Through some dogged determination by Nick we achieved our goal without having to go to trial. I cannot thank Nick, Stephanie and all of the team at Osbornes highly enough for achieving a very favourable settlement, the outcome of which will make a huge difference to myself and my family.
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
Osbornes Instructed After Local Authority Data Breach
Osbornes Law have recently negotiated a settlement on behalf of two clients who had their personal information inadvertently released to...Read more
5-figure settlement for infusion leak to mother
Elline Demetriou has reached another successful outcome for a Claimant, who pursued a post C-section birth injury to mother claim...Read more
Perineal Tear case settles for 6-figure sum
Stephanie Prior recently settled a birth injury claim relating to a woman who delivered her baby after a traumatic labour....Read more
Court avoided after settlement agreed in dental negligence...
The Medical Negligence team have recently negotiated the settlement of a complex dental negligence case. Our client experienced a number...Read more
Delayed cancer diagnosis results in five figure settlement
The medical negligence team at Osbornes Law has recently settled a case involving a patient who passed away following a...Read more
Successful settlement for negligent care during kidney transplant...
Claimant v Royal Free London NHS Trust Osbornes have reached a settlement agreement on behalf of a Claimant who brought...Read more
Successful claim against dental practice after negligent treatment
Osbornes Law have reached another successful outcome for a client, who pursued a claim against dental practitioners due to medical...Read more
Successful settlement for birth injury that led to...
Stephanie Prior’s case relating to the death of Gabriela Pintilie has settled and has been approved by the High...Read more
GP Negligence claim leading to fatality successfully settled
Osbornes acted for a Claimant who brought proceedings on behalf of the estate of her late son, X, relating to...Read more
Justice for client who suffered serious birth injuries
The Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law have recently negotiated the settlement of a case in which our client sustained...Read more
Severe abdominal pain prolonged due to failed surgery
Jodi Newton was instructed in a claim against London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust where our client suffered serious...Read more
Nerve injury following bowel surgery
Stephanie Prior was instructed in a claim against Luton & Dunstable University Hospital where our client sustained an injury to...Read more
Recent birth injury cases
Osbornes Law specialises in helping families who have suffered a birth injury. We have represented families who have suffered the...Read more
Recent fatal medical negligence cases
Osbornes Law specialises in helping families who have suffered a fatality due to inadequate medical care. Our specialist team is...Read more
Recent cancer misdiagnosis negligence cases
Osbornes Law specialises in helping families who have suffered due to a delay or missed cancer diagnosis. We represent clients...Read more
Recent Brain Injury Client Stories
Osbornes Law specialises in helping families who have suffered a brain injury as a result of medical negligence. Our specialist...Read more
Recent cerebral palsy cases
Osbornes Law specialises in helping families where a child has been diagnosed with cerebral palsy. We represent clients and families...Read more
Serious Injury Following TVT Surgery
Case Summary Our client, SG, attended her GP in December 2015 complaining of urinary symptoms including leaking when she laughed or...Read more
Likely settlement of £15-20 million for cerebral palsy...
A client who suffered cerebral palsy injuries at birth was awarded £200,000 as an interim payment in a claim against NHS...Read more
Wrongful birth claim successfully settled
Background Our client, J, fell pregnant in October 2015 and took the difficult decision to undergo a termination. She booked an...Read more
Five-figure Compensation for Cardiac Negligence
In this cardiac negligence claim, we were instructed by a 42-year-old Polish man who had attended the Accident and Emergency...Read more
6 Figure Settlement For Heart Attack Claim
In this cardiac claim, we were instructed by the widow of a 55-year-old man, who had complained of chest pain...Read more
Maternity claim for fatality following caesarean section
Stephanie Prior is acting for a gentleman whose wife died after she had a caesarean section. The claim is on...Read more
Medical Negligence Case Study: Iron infusion cannula injury
Nick Leahy, Solicitor in Osbornes Clinical Negligence team recovered damages for his client who suffered an extravasation injury following an...Read more