Court avoided after settlement agreed in dental negligence claim

23 Jan 2023 | Nicholas Leahy

Table of Contents

The Medical Negligence team have recently negotiated the settlement of a complex dental negligence case. Our client experienced a number of serious problems as a result of the negligence of two dentists, who were business partners at her local dental practice, as a result of which she avoidably lost two of her teeth prematurely.  She was represented by Nicholas Leahy, one of our expert medical negligence lawyers.


Our client first visited the dental practice in August 2009. She knew both dentists personally and initially had a good relationship with them. She had annual appointments at this dentist, and had various treatments over the course of the next few years under both dentists, which mainly consisted of fillings but also root canal treatment at her UL6 tooth. Our client took good care of her oral health generally and had hygienist appointments regularly too.

In February 2021, she booked an appointment with her dentist as a filling on her UL7 tooth had fallen out. She was seen by one of the dental partners on 23 February 2021. He placed a temporary filling on the tooth and he advised her to book another appointment in one month’s time to have a permanent filling.

She booked this appointment, as advised, and attended on 25 March 2021. On this occasion, she felt as if the dentist was in a rush during the appointment. She was seen 40 minutes later than her appointment time and when she was seen, the dentist filled her UL7 tooth. Following this appointment, however, she continued to have problems at UL7. She had pain in the tooth and the entire gum area was affected. The tooth felt bruised and raised slightly and she was not able to eat on that side of her mouth. She arranged another appointment at the dentist and was seen on 31 March 2021 by the second dental partner, who was of the view that our client had a possible infection, and prescribed amoxicillin. She advised her to call the following day if the symptoms had not then eased. The symptoms did not improve and so our client attended once again on 1 April 2021. The dentist adjusted the bite at UL7 and advised Claimant to continue taking the antibiotics.

By April 2021, Claimant had become dissatisfied with the treatment which was being provided to her by the practice and so she booked an appointment with a new dentist at a different practice. She attended on 7 April 2021. This dentist was of the view that the pain at UL7 should settle but that she had an infection around her UL5 tooth and that this would need to be extracted. She was referred to an implant specialist who she saw on 13 April 2021.

Following a CBCT scan which she had at the above appointment, our client was informed that the root canal at her UL6 tooth was failing, and the tooth was unrestorable, as was her UL7 tooth. She was also informed that her UR6 tooth was unrestorable as a result of infection and that this would need to be treated with urgency to prevent the infection from spreading into her sinus canal.

Our client proceeded to have treatment under the care of the new dentist, which included extractions, bone grafts and implant placements. She successfully completed this treatment in early 2022.

Our client complained to the original dentists about the treatment she had received, however, they were not able to agree on the extent of any mistakes made or the damage which had been caused. She remained dissatisfied with the treatment received and therefore decided to consult solicitors to advise her on the prospects of a dental medical negligence case.

Dental Negligence Claim

Nicholas Leahy was instructed by Claimant in July 2021 to investigate a claim for dental negligence against her dentists.

Following initial investigations, expert evidence was obtained from a leading dental expert, Professor Chris Lynch. His report was supportive of Claimant’s case on breach of duty and causation in respect of both her UL6 and UL7 teeth. Professor Lynch was of the opinion that there had been a negligent failure to detect caries at our client’s UL6 tooth over a number of years by both dental partners, which had ultimately made that tooth unrestorable. Additionally, he was of the view that the root canal treatment which had been performed at that tooth was performed negligently, which also would have led to the avoidable loss of UL6. In relation to UL7, Professor Lynch was of the view that in March 2021, the first dentist had performed the filling at UL7 negligently, such that he had unnecessarily deepened the mesial box and created an unnecessarily deep margin. In relation to the UR6 tooth, the position was more nuanced. Professor Lynch felt that the root canal had again been performed negligently, however a reported crack line at the tooth prior to this treatment may have meant that the tooth had a nil prognosis in any event. Further investigation was needed in respect of this tooth.

Professor Lynch was of the view that in the absence of the negligence relating to both UL6 and UL7, our client would have retained both teeth with a lifetime prognosis. In relation to UR6, if it could be shown that the crack was innocuous, then a claim could be supported and the tooth would have been retained with a lifetime prognosis.

A Letter of Claim was sent to the  now defendants in January 2022 who responded on 30 June 2022. In their Letter of Response, the Defendants made only limited admissions in respect of the UL6 and UL7 teeth. The defendants admitted that there had been a ten-month delay in the diagnosis of caries at UL6 between February and December 2012, which had led to the requirement for root canal at that tooth, and that there had been a requirement for a root canal at UL7 following the inadequate provision of a filling in March 2021. The defendants denied that UL6 and UR6 were avoidably lost, and argued that our client had failed to mitigate her loss by having UL7 extracted, rather than a root canal performed. The defendants made a low offer of settlement at the same time as their response.

Professor Lynch remained supportive of our client’s case in spite of the arguments raised by the defendants above. Further investigations were performed in respect of the UR6 tooth and on review of a CBCT scan of that tooth, it was found that on the balance of probabilities that tooth probably would have been unrestorable in any event, even absent the negligence. Professor Lynch was also instructed to examine our client for the purposes of a ‘Condition and Prognosis’ report and on the basis of this report, a Schedule of Loss and Damage was drafted and finalised, enabling us to value her claim.

A further letter was sent to the defendants in August 2022, reiterating our client’s case in respect of the UL6 and UL7 teeth. However, liability continued to remain substantially in dispute and correspondence was exchanged between the parties over the course of the following few months. Laura Hibberd, Counsel, of Deka Chambers in London was instructed to advise our client on her case and the likely value of the case in light of the arguments which were being advanced.

Frustratingly, in October 2022 the defendants made a time-limited offer of settlement, giving our client only 7 days within which to obtain our advice on this offer. After advice from Counsel and our medical expert, it was decided that this offer was too low, and it was rejected. The defendant then unexpectedly resiled from admissions they had made previously in respect of the UL7 tooth, and made a lower offer of settlement to our client.

In January 2023, we responded to the defendants, indicating that our client would maintain her position in respect of both teeth and that if matters could not be resolved imminently, then court proceedings would be issued without further notice. An offer of settlement was made to the defendants at the same time. This was rejected, however, shortly after that the defendants made an improved offer to our client, which she accepted prior to the commencement of court proceedings.

Commenting following the successful resolution of this case, Nicholas Leahy said:

I am pleased that we were able to resolve this case without court proceedings, however, the defendants could have settled this matter at a much earlier stage by accepting fault and making a reasonable offer of settlement to our client. By prolonging the legal process, more stress was caused to my client. However, thanks to the brilliant and reliable expert evidence from Professor Lynch and Laura’s excellent advice in conference and tactically as the case progressed, we were able to resolve the matter in my client’s favour”

How Osbornes Law can help

Our medical negligence lawyers are ranked as leading lawyers in London by Chambers UK and The Legal 500. We are approved solicitors of Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA). This means we have demonstrated our specialist legal expertise and experience in running clinical negligence claims for patients.

To speak with Nicholas regarding a possible dental negligence or another medical negligence claim, please complete the online enquiry form below.

Share this article


Contact Nicholas today

For a free initial conversation call 0207 485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    • "Nicholas Leahy works extremely hard and understands the commercial sensitivities of clinical negligence litigation."

      Legal 500 2023

    • Excellent service from Osbornes throughout on a difficult clinical negligence claim. Nicholas Leahy who handled the claim was responsive and professional throughout, while also providing pragmatic advice and clear drafting.

      Client review

    • Working with Osbornes Law was the best decision I could have made. Nick was really attentive to my issue and did a very thorough job. He truly made the process headache free! Highly recommend them.

      Client review

    • Nick Leahy has been my Solicitor throughout this journey and has been absolutely amazing; kind, approachable and extremely supportive... Through some dogged determination by Nick we achieved our goal without having to go to trial. I cannot thank Nick, Stephanie and all of the team at Osbornes highly enough for achieving a very favourable settlement, the outcome of which will make a huge difference to myself and my family.

      Client review

    Related InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. Surgery

      Claim Against Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust...

      Client obtains settlement after being victim of a surgical negligence Jodi Newton, Partner in our Clinical Negligence department, recently settled...

      Read more
    2. baby

      Settlement In Neonatal Death Case

      Settlement in fatal medical negligence case against King’s College Hospital Nick Leahy, Associate in our Clinical Negligence department, recently...

      Read more
    3. surgeons operating on a patient

      Negligence During Epilepsy Surgery Fatal

      Nicholas Leahy, an Associate in the Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law, has recently settled a long-running fatal medical negligence...

      Read more
    4. 5.1.2024

      Delayed Pre-Eclampsia Diagnosis Resulting in Tragic Baby Loss

      Introduction to the Case Nick Leahy, Associate in our Clinical Negligence department, has recently settled a birth injury claim against...

      Read more
    5. 23.11.2023

      Claim against Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

      Osbornes acted for a Claimant, C, in her birth negligence claim against Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust for negligent...

      Read more
    6. Cancer treatment in a modern medical private clinic

      Large Compensation for Delayed Laryngeal Cancer Diagnosis

      Actress receives financial award after life-changing missed cancer diagnosis. Jodi Newton acted for a client who was belatedly diagnosed with...

      Read more
    7. Fatal Medical Negligence Claim

      Delayed cervical cancer diagnosis client story

      Introduction Jodi Newton acted for a woman who died following a delayed cervical cancer diagnosis. The deceased could have been...

      Read more
    8. hospital

      Appendicitis Compensation Claim

      Failure to diagnose appendicitis case settles for 5-figure sum Stephanie Prior was instructed in a claim against Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS...

      Read more
    9. model of a spine

      Spinal Fracture Case Settles for 6-figure Sum

      Spinal Fractures following cessation of Denosumab injection Stephanie Prior was instructed in a spinal injury claim against Mid and South...

      Read more
    10. Beautician hold syringe for young female client

      Delayed skin cancer diagnosis

      We are pleased to have successfully settled a client’s claim for a delayed cancer diagnosis – Basal Cell Carcinoma (“BCC”)....

      Read more
    11. Fatal Medical Negligence Claim

      Compensation Claim for Fatal Bowel Injury

      Jodi Newton, a Partner in the Clinical Negligence Department at Osbornes Law, has recently settled a long running fatal medical...

      Read more
    12. hospital

      Prison Healthcare Negligence

      Nicholas Leahy, a solicitor in the Clinical Negligence Department at Osbornes Law, has  recently successfully settled a long running case...

      Read more
    13. Confidential file

      Osbornes Instructed After Local Authority Data Breach

      Osbornes Law has recently negotiated a settlement on behalf of two clients who had their personal information inadvertently released to...

      Read more
    14. baby hand in mothers hand

      5-figure settlement for infusion leak to mother

      Elline Demetriou has reached another successful outcome for a Claimant, who pursued a post C-section birth injury to mother claim...

      Read more
    15. water

      Perineal Tear case settles for 6-figure sum

      Stephanie Prior recently settled a claim relating to a woman who delivered her baby after a traumatic labour. Her son...

      Read more
    16. Doctor With Stethoscope And Files

      Delayed diagnosis of appendiceal cancer

      The medical negligence team at Osbornes Law has recently settled a case involving a patient who passed away following a...

      Read more
    17. hands of surgeon

      Successful settlement for negligent care during kidney transplant...

      Claimant v Royal Free London NHS Trust Osbornes have reached a settlement agreement on behalf of a Claimant who brought...

      Read more
    18. Modern dental office interior

      Successful claim against dental practice after negligent treatment

      Osbornes Law have reached another successful outcome for a client, who pursued a claim against dental practitioners due to medical...

      Read more
    19. pregnant lady making a heart shape

      Tragic Case Involving a Home Water Birth

      Introduction to the case Nicholas Leahy is acting for a young woman who had a water birth at home and...

      Read more
    20. child with blue paint on hands

      Mother & Baby Suffer Life-changing Injuries

      Claim after mother and baby suffered life-changing injuries during birth Jodi is acting for both mother and baby in a...

      Read more
    21. Medical doctor in empty hospital corridor

      Bereavement Following Treatment at Basildon Maternity Unit

      Stephanie Prior’s death by medical negligence claim relating to the death of Gabriela Pintilie has been settled and approved...

      Read more
    22. Doctor

      GP Negligence claim leading to fatality successfully settled

      Osbornes acted for a Claimant who brought proceedings on behalf of the estate of her late son, X, relating to...

      Read more
    23. 23.5.2022

      Successful Claim Against King’s College Hospitals

      The birth injury lawyers at Osbornes Law have recently negotiated the settlement of a case in which our client sustained...

      Read more
    24. Female surgeon wearing surgical mask

      Severe abdominal pain prolonged due to failed surgery

      Jodi Newton was instructed in a claim against London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust where our client suffered serious...

      Read more