What is Welfare Benefits law?
Osbornes Law are one of the few law firms to have a contract with the Legal Aid Agency in the area of Welfare Benefits law.
However, legal aid is only in scope for cases before the Upper Tribunal. This means that legal aid is not available for generic advice on welfare benefits issues, or for appeals of benefit decisions before the First Tier Tribunal.
Welfare Benefit Appeals
If you have received a negative decision in your first appeal, however, and wish to explore the possibility of an appeal to the Upper Tribunal we may be able to assist you with this under our Welfare Benefits contract.
We also continue to provide assistance in appeals before the First Tier Tribunal and general advice in respect of welfare benefits matters. If possible we will try to agree a fix fee for work done on your case. In rare cases we may be able to apply for exceptional funding from the Legal Aid Agency to cover work that is out of scope for legal aid (such as appeals before the First Tier Tribunal), but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do this in all cases.
There are also various situations in which there is no right of appeal in respect of a decision in relation to welfare benefits, or regarding a policy or rule implemented by a local authority or the Department of Work and Pensions.
In these cases the only way in which a decision can be challenged is by way of a claim for Judicial Review.
We have set out more detail on this in the FAQs section below. However, as Osbornes Law has a public law contract, as well as a Welfare Benefits contract, we are in a strong position to be able to assist clients by bringing Judicial Review claims in relation to welfare benefits issues in appropriate cases.
Osbornes Law has experience in dealing with issues involving all types of welfare benefits, including
- Universal Credit
- Housing Benefit
- Personal Independent Payments
- Disability Living Allowance
- Employment and Support Allowance
- Income Support
- Jobseekers Allowance
- Child Benefit
- Tax Credits
- Pension Credit.
What do I need to do?
In most cases if you disagree with a decision by a benefits agency, such as a local authority or the Department of Work and Pensions (“DWP”), you have one month in which to challenge the decision. The first stage is to ask the decision maker to reconsider their decision (in cases involving the DWP this is called the “mandatory reconsideration” stage, and in Housing Benefit cases it is called a “revision”).
If you remain dissatisfied after this stage you will need to make an appeal. In most cases the time limit for submitting an appeal is one month from the date of the mandatory reconsideration or revised decision.
You should keep a clear record of all correspondence and interaction with the body making decisions on your benefits. Ideally this should all be in writing. In relation to Universal Credit most interaction with the DWP will be through the online journal, which will provide a written record of what you and the DWP have said.
Frequently Asked Questions
When can I bring a claim for Judicial Review in relation to welfare benefit cases?
The following are examples of cases where a claim for Judicial Review is appropriate:
- Public law challenges. This is where a challenge is brought to legislation or a policy that is considered to be unlawful. Recent examples of this include challenges to the “bedroom tax” and the “benefit cap”.
- Decisions where there is no right of appeal to the First Tier Tribunal. These include:
- A failure or refusal to carry out a mandatory reconsideration of a decision;
- A decision to suspend (as opposed to terminate) a payment of benefit;
- Whether or not to waive recovery of an overpayment;
- A refusal to carry out an “any time” revision. In certain circumstances a benefit authority can consider revising a decision even where the normal time limit for an appeal has passed (13 months). If the benefit authority refuses to carry out an anytime revision then this can only be challenged by way of Judicial Review.
- Refusal of by the Upper Tribunal to grant permission to appeal from the First Tier Tribunal
- Interim decisions by a First Tier Tribunal judge. A Judicial Review to the Upper Tribunal can be brought against interim decisions of the First Tier Tribunal Judge regarding the case management of the appeal under the Tribunal’s procedure rules. There is no specific right of appeal to do this, so Judicial Review before the Upper Tribunal is the only option to effectively challenge an interim decision.
Are there any circumstances in which Judicial Review can be used if there is a right of appeal to the First Tier Tribunal?
Judicial Review is a remedy of last resort, which means that in most cases where there is an alternative route to challenge a decision, such as an appeal to the First Tier Tribunal, a claimant will be expected to pursue that route. However, in some situations it may be possible to bring a Judicial Review claim even where there is technically a right of appeal to a Tribunal.
This can happen where the alternative remedy is not effective, such as where the consequences of waiting for the appeal to be heard before the First Tribunal would be so serious that waiting for the hearing would deny the claimant any meaningful benefit of success at that hearing. An example of this could be where Housing Benefit has been refused and a client is facing a possession claim under mandatory rent arrears grounds., but by the time the Housing Benefit appeal is concluded it will be too late because a Court would have made a possession order. In this situation a claim for Judicial Review may be appropriate. As a result of welfare reforms and problems with the administration of benefits there can be situations in which individuals are left without any benefits and are at risk of destitution. In such cases sometimes Judicial Review will be the only effective remedy.
Can I challenge a decision of the First Tier Tribunal because I am unhappy with the result?
An appeal to the Upper Tribunal can only proceed on a point of law, not just because you are unhappy with the decision of the First Tier Tribunal. It will be necessary to demonstrate that there has been some failing by the First Tier Tribunal. Points of law can include a failure to take into account relevant evidence, reliance upon irrelevant considerations, a misunderstanding of legislation, and a failure to apply relevant binding case law.
Useful links
- Child Poverty Action Group https://cpag.org.uk/
- Shelter https://www.shelter.org.uk/
- Disability Rights UK https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/
- Citizens Advice Bureau https://www.camdencabservice.org.uk/
- Age UK https://www.ageuk.org.uk/
- Turn2 https://www.turn2us.org.uk/
Accreditations




Latest Housing And Social Care News
Teenage asylum seeker wins legal battle against Council for unlawful age assessment
Vulnerable teenage asylum seeker wins age case against council which unlawfully assessed him A vulnerable teenager who sought asylum in the UK when he was 15 – but was accused […]
Read MoreHackney Council ignore vulnerable resident’s request for a safer front door
Paranoid schizophrenic ignored by Hackney Council for four years wins legal battle over unsafe front door A man who suffers from paranoid schizophrenia was left terrified for his life after […]
Read MoreLitigation Webinar: 28th January
POWER IN NUMBERS: WHEN THREE OR MORE IS NOT A CROWD! Thursday 28th January 5:00pm – 6:00pm Join this webinar to find out more about group actions. In particular the circumstances […]
Read MoreOsbornes win landmark Appeal in Housing case
The housing team at Osbornes have won a landmark appeal which has the potential to impact individuals living in cramped and overcrowded conditions. Favio Flores, 46, and his partner Elba […]
Read MoreHousing disrepair issues resolved after three years
Osbornes were instructed on behalf of a disabled tenant who had been decanted from her temporary accommodation for some three years whilst the local authority carried out repairs which should […]
Read MoreEviction from home of vulnerable man during lockdown prevented
Osbornes were instructed just before the lockdown to prevent the eviction of a vulnerable man with capacity issues. He had accrued rent arrears of around £10,000 as his benefits had […]
Read MoreOsbornes applying to Supreme Court in housing possession case
In the case of Gateway Housing Association –v- Begum (2) the Court of Appeal recently decided that a tenant must leave the property even though there was confusion as to […]
Read MoreYoung mother secures accommodation after illegal evictions during the pandemic
Here at Osbornes we have seen illegal evictions on the increase during this global pandemic. Osbornes have been advising many tenants who have unfortunately found themselves locked out of their […]
Read MoreBusiness eviction ban extended
The Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick announced today (9th December 2020) that business owners affected by the pandemic will have protection from eviction until the end of March 2021. Earlier this […]
Read MoreCase news: Housing benefit decision addresses issue of what is a full time course of education?
The background You might be forgiven for thinking that the question of whether a course is full time or part time is fairly straightforward and does not require the involvement […]
Read More