Osbornes Wins Judicial Review on Legal Aid Fees

High Court

Contact

William Ford

Table of Contents

Osbornes successful in judicial review of Lord Chancellor over legal aid fees for Welfare Benefits

On 28 January 2025 the High Court approved a consent order in relation to a judicial review claim brought by Osbornes concerning the rates paid by the Lord Chancellor in relation to Welfare Benefits legal aid work.

Background

The scope of Welfare Benefits work was significantly cut by the previous government following the introduction of the Legal Aid, Sentencing, and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (“LASPO”). Post LASPO legal aid for Welfare Benefits only remains in scope for appeals at the Upper Tribunal stage and higher Courts. This means that no legal aid is available for early advice or for appeals to the First Tier Tribunal.

These changes resulted in a significant decrease in the number of Welfare Benefits cases taken on by legal aid providers, as well as the creation of advice deserts for this area of law in many parts of the country. However, the need for Welfare Benefits advice has, if anything, increased, with complex changes being made to the social security system, such as the introduction of Universal Credit.

The majority of legal aid work is intended to be carried out under the Legal Help scheme (also known as “Controlled Work”), which covers advice and assistance, but does not cover representation at Tribunal hearings. It is possible to apply for a legal aid certificate (also known as “Licensed Work”) via a grant of exceptional case funding (“ECF”) to cover representation at a Tribunal, but there is no automatic entitlement to legal aid in that scenario, and a decision granting ECF has to be made by the Legal Aid Agency (“LAA”).

The funding regime for Legal Help work is by way of payment of a fixed fee, and the fixed fee varies depending on the area of civil legal aid. Historically it had always been possible for a legal aid provider to claim their actual incurred costs (at legal aid rates), if the fees incurred on a case exceeded three times the fixed fee. In Welfare Benefits cases the fixed fee was £150. That meant that if the actual costs of the case exceeded £450 a legal aid provider could claim their actual costs.

Following LASPO the government enacted the Civil Legal Aid (Remuneration) Regulations 2013 (“the Remuneration Regulations”). This confirmed a fixed fee of £150 and escape threshold of £450 for Welfare Benefits work. However, in 2014 and 2016 the LAA tendered for Welfare Benefits contracts in specific regions of the country (namely the North, Southwest, and Wales procurement areas). In relation to those legal aid contracts a fixed fee of £208 was introduced, but, crucially, with no possibility of an escape fee. This meant that whatever the costs incurred on a case were, in terms of the number of hours incurred, the fee would always be £208.

The LAA then tendered for the 2018 Standard Civil Contract. However, the Remuneration Regulations were not updated to apply the £208 fixed fee to work carried out under the 2018 contract, so providers were able to continue to claim a fixed fee of £150 with an escape threshold of £450. Eventually the government amended the Remuneration Regulations to apply the £208 fixed fee to the 2018 contract with effect from 1 April 2023.

In the run up to the implementation of the 2024 Standard Civil Contract (which took effect from September 2024), Osbornes, along with the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (“LAPG”), made requests to the LAA and the Ministry of Justice to allow legal aid providers to be allowed to claim an escape fee under the 2024 contract.

Notwithstanding these requests the government enacted the Civil Legal Aid (Standard Civil Contract – Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2024 (“the 2024 Regulations”), which applied the £208 fixed fee only regime to the 2024 Contract with effect from 23 September 2024.

Legal Challenge

The removal of the escape fee threshold for Welfare Benefits made Welfare Benefits legal aid work for Osbornes entirely unprofitable and unsustainable. In such circumstances, at best, Osbornes would have had to substantially reduce the amount of Welfare Benefits legal aid it undertook, or, potentially, cease doing this area of work altogether.

Osbornes therefore took the decision to challenge the 2024 Regulations and bring legal action against the Lord Chancellor (who has overall responsibility for legal aid). We gathered evidence from other Welfare Benefits providers and analysed the statistical evidence demonstrating the decline in Welfare Benefits legal aid cases and providers, as well as the issues created for access to justice. A detailed pre-action letter was sent on 6 November 2024, and a claim was issued at the High Court on 29 November 2024.

Following the issue of proceedings we were able to reach settlement and on 28 January 2025 the High Court approved a consent order reached between Osbornes and the Lord Chancellor. The Lord Chancellor has agreed to introduce an escape fee mechanism for Welfare Benefits cases with a fixed fee of £208. The government aims to lay regulations to this effect by the end of April 2025.

Upon this basis the judicial review claim was withdrawn and the Lord Chancellor agreed to pay Osbornes’ costs of bringing the claim.

Outcome

This means that once amending regulations to the Remuneration Regulations are passed, legal aid providers will again be able to claim the actual costs incurred in bringing a Welfare Benefits case, where the costs exceed three times the fixed fee.

William Ford, one of the solicitors who represented Osbornes comments:

“We are very pleased that the Lord Chancellor has taken the step to settle this case and reinstate an escape fee mechanism for Welfare Benefits cases. There remain many challenges in respect of the viability of legal aid provision for this area of law, but this decision goes some way towards ensuring that legal aid providers are able to continue to provide vital representation to vulnerable clients with benefit problems. We hope that the government will take the opportunity as part of the Review of Civil Legal Aid to restore scope for early advice and representation before the First Tier Tribunal for this area”.

Osbornes were represented by William Ford and Emma Vincent-Miller, and instructed Chris Buttler KC, Eleanor Mitchell and Emma Foubister at Matrix Chambers as counsel.

Contact us

Osbornes Law are experienced in advising on judicial review matters. If you need legal advice on whether a judicial review is the appropriate remedy,  you can contact us for specialist advice by:

  • Filling in our online enquiry form below; or
  • Calling us on 020 7485 8811

The Law Society Gazette covered this case. Click here to read the article. 

Share this article

  • “The housing team at Osbornes is the best in England.”

  • “The lawyers at Osbornes Law work with passion, putting in all their best.”

Get Expert Legal Advice Today Our experienced team offers clear, practical advice tailored to your needs Get Expert Guidance

Contact us today

Enquiry Assessment Form

  • Osbornes have a strong team with some truly excellent individuals.

    Legal 500 2025

  • Edward Taylor is an outstanding public law solicitor. He has particular skills in working with vulnerable clients and in complex and fast-moving cases.

    Legal 500 2025

  • They are tenacious, approachable, and extremely effective in representing the interests of their clients including in highly complex cases.

    Legal 500 2025

  • Osbornes Law are a truly excellent team. They cover a range of immigration, housing, and social care matters with a core commitment to representing vulnerable clients.

    Legal 500 2025

  • Alex McMahon is another notable team member who practices across housing law, public law, and community care.

    Legal 500 2025

  • A market leader across public law, international cases, financial and children work.

    Legal 500 2025

  • The team is particularly well regarded for its expertise in accommodation rights and asylum support. It also has dedicated expertise in social welfare matters.

    Chambers UK 2024

  • Osbornes Law has a well-regarded practice which sees the firm act in judicial review challenges against local and central government bodies.

    Chambers UK 2024

  • Osbornes are on top of the law and best practice surrounding age assessments of putative children; this filters through to their case preparation and client care at every stage

    Chambers UK 2024

  • All of the team have strong expertise and are able to address enquiries quickly.

    Chambers UK 2024

  • Osbornes are a fantastic team who really stand out in the market in the fields of housing and social care.

    Legal 500 2024

  • Excellent public law firm, strongly dedicated to its vulnerable clients.

    Legal 500 2024

  • Osbornes provides a first-class service to clients, really advocating on their behalf.

    Legal 500 2024

  • Osbornes is highly regarded for conducting judicial review challenges against local authorities and the SSHD

    Legal 500 2024

  • "Osbornes are always very good at dealing with complex cases. They are a very knowledgeable and experienced team."

    Chambers UK 2023

  • "They are very flexible and accessible for vulnerable young people who don't fully understand the legal system."

    Chambers UK 2023

  • "The team adapts with the constant changes that are taking place in the public law sphere; they handle complicated matters with ease."

    Chambers UK 2023

  • William Ford is experienced in representing tenants in disrepair and possession claims, as well as homelessness appeals and judicial reviews concerning allocation of housing.

    Chambers UK 2023

  • "I have nothing but praise for Osbornes Law. They provide an excellent client centered service. I would not hesitate to recommend them. A client would be in very safe hands with them."

    Legal 500 2023

  • ‘I have worked with Osbornes on judicial reviews, in which they have an excellent reputation.’

  • "The team are exceptionally dedicated and hard-working. The team also have an excellent command of the applicable legal principles and are adept at exploring the best evidence on behalf of their clients."

    Legal 500 2023

  • "The team are regularly involved in complex challenges including strategic litigation and policy challenges."

    Legal 500 2023

  • ‘They are a go-to for confident, diligent and careful work and really excel in client care and knowledge in the field.’

    Legal 500 2023

  • "Osbornes are an extremely strong team with highly capable solicitors, associates and partners working in public law."

    Legal 500 2023

  • "The administrative and public law team at Osbornes are highly experienced with a consistently high standard of work. They have tackled some of the most important recent public law cases involving housing and social welfare issues."

    Legal 500 2023

Related InsightsVIEW ALL

  1. Mental health support
    13.1.2025

    Osbornes Law Secures Mental Health Support for Asylum...

    Home office backs down over decision to deny mental health support to suicidal torture victim seeking asylum The Home Office...

    Read more
  2. Trbunal decision
    7.10.2024

    Disabled Woman Wins £34,000 Benefits Case

    The Background to the Case In 2019 Ramona Cerbu was crossing the road when she was hit by a car and...

    Read more
  3. camden road
    5.4.2024

    DWP Exposed for £32,000 Underpayment of Disability Benefits

    Osbornes Law has assisted a vulnerable client to recover underpaid disability benefits totalling over £32,000. Our client, a disabled young man,...

    Read more
  4. 28.9.2023

    Gatekept homeless teenager accommodated by local housing authority

    Miss X, a 17 year old whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, left her family home in March 2022 following...

    Read more
  5. 28.9.2023

    Homelessness case successfully settled for elderly disabled lady

    Ms X, whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, had been living in a privately rented one-bedroom flat for...

    Read more
  6. 28.9.2023

    Disrepair Claim for Single Father

    Background to the Claim Osbornes Law represented a private tenant, a single father living with his young son in their...

    Read more
  7. 28.9.2023

    Client successfully rehoused following refusal by local authority

    Background to the case Osbornes Law represented a client who had been found intentionally homeless by his local authority. He...

    Read more
  8. 28.9.2023

    Client rehoused and £16,000 arrears cleared

    Osbornes Law were instructed to assist a client to suspend a warrant for possession. The client had fallen into arrears...

    Read more
  9. 26.9.2023

    Victory for Homeless Victim

    Mr X, whose details are anonymised to protect his privacy, fled his home country due to severe persecution from the...

    Read more
  10. 13.9.2023

    Successful homelessness judicial review case against Redbridge Council

    This matter involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against Redbridge Council for failure to comply with...

    Read more
  11. 13.7.2023

    Family Unlawfully Evicted Receives Damages of £22,000

    Case Summary: Unlawful Eviction Claim Against Private Landlord This matter involved an unlawful eviction claim brought by our clients against...

    Read more
  12. Man is making audit of household expenses
    21.4.2023

    Success in Court of Appeal in child disability...

    The Court of Appeal has today handed judgment in the case of Harrington v Secretary of State for Work and...

    Read more
  13. Churchill Gardens neighborhood in Pimlico
    20.1.2023

    High Court finds Westminster Council’s Housing Scheme...

    Westminster City Council’s housing allocation scheme found to be unlawful The High Court has today handed down judgment finding...

    Read more
  14. East London aerial view
    14.11.2022

    Housing allocation case questions lawfulness of council’s...

    Until February 2022, the social housing allocation scheme for the London Borough of Newham allowed people who lived outside the borough...

    Read more
  15. water
    10.6.2022

    Housing Disrepair Claim for Leaking Pipe

    Our solicitors at Osbornes Law successfully assisted a client in resolving a severe disrepair claim involving water leaks, damp, and...

    Read more
  16. DATE OF BIRTH close up on a printed form
    12.4.2022

    Vulnerable child wrongly assessed to be an adult

    Upper Tribunal finds a vulnerable child to be 17 years old despite two flawed local authority age assessments which led to...

    Read more
  17. blue and orange flats
    15.8.2021

    Housing Disrepair Due To Persistent Dampness

    Serious disrepair issues Our solicitors at Osbornes Law have successfully settled a disrepair claim on behalf of a local authority...

    Read more
  18. london apartments
    22.12.2020

    Housing Disrepair Claim for Disabled Tenant

    Background to the Case Osbornes Law were instructed by a disabled tenant who had been decanted from her temporary accommodation...

    Read more
  19. wall in disrepair
    15.9.2020

    Housing Disrepair Against Local Authority

    Successful Claim of Disrepair Against Local Authority Osbornes Law, has successfully settled a significant housing disrepair claim on behalf of...

    Read more
  20. notting hill housing
    15.10.2019

    Housing Disrepair Claim in Notting Hill

    Successful settlement of Housing Disrepair Claim William Ford, a partner in Osbornes Law’s Housing and Social Care Department, has...

    Read more
  21. infestation of lady birds
    20.6.2019

    Housing Disrepair Claim for Vulnerable Family

    Our solicitors at Osbornes Law successfully assisted a client in resolving a challenging housing disrepair claim involving severe damp, leaks,...

    Read more
  22. buddleia
    5.10.2018

    Housing Disrepair Claim for Structural Damage

    Our solicitors  successfully represented a client in a disrepair claim against a landlord involving structural damage and  severe damp in...

    Read more

VIEW ALL