When can you challenge public body decisions about policies?

16 Apr 2024 | Emma Vincent Miller
houses of parliament

Table of Contents

An introduction to public law

Public law governs the relationship between public bodies, such as central government or local government, and private individuals. Public bodies, including government ministers, must comply with the law and if they fail to do so this can be challenged by way of judicial review in the High Court.

What are policies?

Policies – sometimes called guidance or procedure – exist to guide decision makers, and can help private individuals to understand how a public body will approach their case.

By way of example, the Home Office has a policy governing how it allocates accommodation to destitute asylum seekers. Local authorities have policies concerning when they will award Discretionary Housing Payment or when they will impose charges for adult social care.

Policies are not law and as such do not bind public bodies, but issues relating to policies often arise in judicial review claims. Case law says that a policy should be followed by a decision maker, unless there is a good reason to depart from it.[1] If a policy has not been properly considered or has been wrongly applied by a decision maker, then this is a basis on which to seek judicial review of a decision.

Secret policies

Public bodies should make their policies publicly available, so private individuals know where they stand. This also helps ensure an individual has an opportunity to make meaningful representations before a decision is made about them. If policies are kept secret, the failure to publish the policy can be a cause of action in judicial review.[2]

Challenging policies

Policy documents themselves can also be challenged by way of judicial review, for example if a policy contravenes the public body’s legal duties under the Human Rights Act 1998 or the Equality Act 2010. If these cases are successful, the High Court can decide that a policy (or part of a policy) should be ‘quashed’, usually meaning it would need to be withdrawn or rewritten.

Until recently, policies could be challenged if there was an unacceptable risk they would lead a decision maker to act unlawfully. The scope for these sorts of challenges has reduced in the last few years, following Supreme Court cases.[3] In R (A) v SSHD [at 46] the Supreme Court clarified the three types of cases where a policy may now be found to be unlawful for misrepresenting the law:

“(i) where the policy includes a positive statement of law which is wrong and which will induce a person who follows the policy to breach their legal duty in some way…..; (ii) where the authority which promulgates the policy does so pursuant to a duty to provide accurate advice about the law but fails to do so ….:; and(iii) where the authority, even though not under a duty to issue a policy, decides to promulgate one and in doing so purports in the policy to provide a full account of the legal position but fails to achieve that…”.

This narrows the scope for challenging the lawfulness of government policies.

The court in A nevertheless emphasised the important fact that if a public body has breached their legal duty and acted unfairly, regardless of whether the unfairness was produced by the application of a policy or not, then an individual is of course entitled to seek redress.

How can we help?

Osbornes Law are experienced in advising on judicial review matters including challenges to central and local government decision making, and issues relating to policies. If you have been treated unfairly by a public body and would like advice on whether judicial review is the appropriate remedy, you can contact us for specialist advice on 020 7485 8811.

[1] See R (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1363 and R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245

[2]R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245

[3]R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2019/0065, R (BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2019/0147

Share this article


Contact us today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    Related InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. asylum seeker

      Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children

      Age is just a number? Shining a light on Local Authorities’ Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children A recent report...

      Read more
    2. camden road

      DWP Exposed for £32,000 Underpayment of Disability Benefits

      Osbornes Law has assisted a vulnerable client to recover underpaid disability benefits totalling over £32,000. Our client, a disabled young man,...

      Read more
    3. 23.1.2024

      Case Reiterates Local Authorities should follow Allocation Scheme

      R (on the application of Kukhtyak) -v- London Borough of Hounslow [2023] EWHC 2914 (Admin) This sad case concerned an elderly couple...

      Read more
    4. housing discussions

      Supreme Court sets High Threshold for Local Authorities...

      Judgment was handed down on 28 November 2023 by the Supreme Court in an important case regarding the main housing duty. The...

      Read more
    5. 28.9.2023

      Gatekept homeless teenager accommodated by local housing authority

      Miss X, a 17 year old whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, left her family home in March 2022 following...

      Read more
    6. 28.9.2023

      Homelessness case successfully settled for elderly disabled lady

      Ms X, whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, had been living in a privately rented one-bedroom flat for...

      Read more
    7. 28.9.2023

      Disrepair case against Landlord and Freeholder successfully settled

      Osbornes Law represented a private tenant who lived with his young son. The property suffered from severe disrepair including leaking/...

      Read more
    8. 28.9.2023

      Client successfully rehoused following refusal by local authority

      Osbornes Law represented a client who had been found intentionally homeless by his local authority. He was extremely vulnerable and...

      Read more
    9. 28.9.2023

      Client rehoused and £16,000 arrears cleared

      Osbornes Law were instructed to assist a client to suspend a warrant for possession. The client had fallen into arrears...

      Read more
    10. 26.9.2023

      Victory for Homeless Victim

      Mr X, whose details are anonymised to protect his privacy, fled his home country due to severe persecution from the...

      Read more
    11. 13.9.2023

      Successful homelessness judicial review case against Redbridge Council

      This matter involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against Redbridge Council for failure to comply with...

      Read more
    12. Renters Reform Bill

      The Renters (Reform) Bill – Will it have the...

      There has been much publicity recently over the Renters (Reform) Bill, the assumption being that the government have their eye...

      Read more
    13. 13.7.2023

      Family Unlawfully Evicted Receives Damages of £22,000

      This matter involved an unlawful eviction claim brought by our clients against their private landlord (“the Landlord”). Our clients were...

      Read more
    14. Man is making audit of household expenses

      Success in Court of Appeal in child disability...

      The Court of Appeal has today handed judgment in the case of Harrington v Secretary of State for Work and...

      Read more
    15. Churchill Gardens neighborhood in Pimlico

      High Court finds Westminster Council’s Housing Scheme...

      Westminster City Council’s housing allocation scheme found to be unlawful The High Court has today handed down judgment finding...

      Read more
    16. East London aerial view

      Housing allocation case questions lawfulness of council’s...

      Until February 2022, the social housing allocation scheme for the London Borough of Newham allowed people who lived outside the borough...

      Read more
    17. london house

      Immediate, Non-Deferrable and Unqualified

      Judgment was handed down on 04 May 2022 in the Court of Appeal in an important case regarding the main housing duty....

      Read more
    18. DATE OF BIRTH close up on a printed form

      Vulnerable child wrongly assessed to be an adult

      Upper Tribunal finds a vulnerable child to be 17 years old despite two flawed local authority age assessments which led to...

      Read more
    19. Homeless Teenager

      Council overturns unlawful housing policy

      Homeless teenager claims victory for more than 1,200 homeless people after forcing council to overturn unlawful housing policy A homeless teenager...

      Read more
    20. shoreditch london

      Homeless Teenager takes London Council to High Court

      A homeless teenager is taking a London council to the High Court for ‘unlawfully’ banning hundreds of homeless people from...

      Read more
    21. mould

      Housing Disrepair Scandal in South London

      Following an investigation by ITV nearly 500 homes in the Eastfields Estate in Mitcham, south London, owned by the housing association...

      Read more
    22. model houses

      Council to amend unlawful housing allocation banding process

      For the last 8 years Brent Council has stopped the majority of homeless applicants from bidding for rehousing, treating them as ‘...

      Read more
    23. Troy Golide

      Hackney Council ignore vulnerable resident’s request

      Paranoid schizophrenic ignored by Hackney Council for four years wins legal battle over unsafe front door A man who suffers...

      Read more
    24. asylum seekers

      Teenage asylum seeker wins legal battle against Council...

      Vulnerable teenage asylum seeker wins age case against the council which unlawfully assessed him A vulnerable teenager who sought asylum...

      Read more