Melanoma misdiagnosis claims
When a missed melanoma changes everything
If your melanoma was dismissed as a benign mole, missed by a dermatologist, or diagnosed too late to be cured by excision alone, you may have grounds for a claim. We will review your case in confidence and without obligation.
“Osbornes handles a wide range of high-value and complex clinical negligence cases, with particular expertise in birth injury, delayed cancer diagnosis, spinal injury, and fatal claims.”
“Osbornes Law is an established firm which handles a breadth of complex and high-value clinical negligence matters.”
At Osbornes Law, our medical negligence team has spent decades pursuing melanoma misdiagnosis claims for clients across the UK, including a case in which partner Jodi Newton acted for a woman whose foot melanoma was dismissed as a cosmetic concern. We act on a no win no fee basis.
Why melanoma misdiagnosis happens
Partner Jodi Newton acted for a client whose melanoma started as a lesion on her foot. A dermatologist examined it and reassured her that it was benign. Concerned that the lesion was changing, she returned to her GP. She was sent away and treated as a cosmetic concern rather than a cancer suspect. She went back. The same response.
Hospital radiology eventually confirmed the lesion was malignant melanoma. By then the delay had cost her the option of simple excision. The surgery was more extensive, the scarring greater, and her prognosis materially worse than it would have been had the dermatologist or her GP acted on the warning signs at first presentation. Jodi successfully pursued a medical negligence claim on her behalf.
This pattern repeats across the melanoma claims we handle. The lesion is dismissed at a routine appointment, dismissed again on return, and the patient is left with the surgery, the scarring or the systemic treatment that prompt diagnosis would have avoided.
Two factors drive most misdiagnosis claims. The first is acral lentiginous melanoma. This subtype appears on the soles, palms and under nails, often without obvious pigmentation. It is rarer than the classic mole-derived melanoma, so it is more often missed in primary care. The second is the assumption that an unusual mole in a young patient must be benign. Melanoma is among the most common cancers in young adults in the UK.
Our team also acts in delayed diagnosis claims for non-melanoma skin cancers. Associate Elline Demetriou settled a delayed basal cell carcinoma claim where the patient’s BCC went undiagnosed before treatment was eventually started.
What NICE NG12 expects from a GP
NICE guideline NG12 sets out what should happen with a suspicious skin lesion. GPs should apply the weighted 7-point checklist to pigmented lesions. The major features (change in size, change in shape, change in colour) score 2 points each. The minor features (diameter 7mm or more, inflammation, oozing or crusting, change in sensation) score 1 point each.
A score of 3 or more should trigger an urgent referral on the two-week-wait suspected cancer pathway. A lesion that looks like a nodular melanoma should be referred regardless of the score. A pigmented or non-pigmented lesion that suggests melanoma on dermoscopy should also be referred urgently.
When we review records, we look for whether the checklist was applied, what the dermoscopy showed, and whether the lesion was photographed and reviewed at the next appointment. If those steps were skipped, that is often the starting point for a breach of duty argument.
When a missed melanoma diagnosis amounts to medical negligence
A claim does not arise just because the diagnosis came late. We have to show two things. First, that the care fell below the standard of a reasonably competent GP or dermatologist. Second, that the delay made a real difference to your treatment options or your prognosis.
NICE NG12 and NICE NG14 (melanoma: assessment and management) are the benchmarks we use. NG14 sets the pathway from the point of suspicion through staging, sentinel lymph node biopsy, surgical management, BRAF mutation testing and immunotherapy options.
Causation in melanoma claims turns on Breslow thickness, the depth of the tumour measured under the microscope. A melanoma found at less than 1mm is usually cured by wide local excision alone, with a five-year survival above 95%. The same tumour caught months later at 4mm or with sentinel lymph node involvement requires more extensive surgery, adjuvant immunotherapy, and carries a far worse prognosis. We instruct independent dermatologists and oncologists to compare what your treatment and outcome would have been at the missed appointment with where you are now.
The impact of a late melanoma diagnosis
Early melanoma is one of the most curable cancers. A thin lesion, excised promptly with a clear margin, often requires no further treatment beyond surveillance.
The picture changes as the Breslow thickness increases. Beyond 1mm, sentinel lymph node biopsy becomes standard. Stage III disease means lymph node involvement and the offer of adjuvant immunotherapy with drugs such as pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Stage IV disease means metastatic spread, and treatment shifts to systemic immunotherapy, targeted therapy for BRAF-mutant melanoma, or palliative care.
The impact reaches beyond clinical outcome. Wider excisions leave more disfiguring scars. Lymph node clearance can cause chronic lymphoedema. Systemic treatments come with their own side effects, and the prospect of recurrence shapes everything that follows. We act for families in fatal medical negligence claims where a thin curable melanoma at the missed appointment had progressed to stage IV by the time of diagnosis.
What you can claim compensation for
Compensation is calculated under two heads. General damages cover the pain, suffering and loss of amenity caused by the negligence. The Judicial College Guidelines set the brackets for cancer cases, including scarring. Special damages cover the financial losses.
In practice, that includes:
- Loss of earnings if the late diagnosis has stopped you working, or shortened your working life.
- Private treatment costs, including private immunotherapy or follow-up imaging not always offered on the NHS.
- Scar revision surgery, compression garments and lymphoedema management.
- Travel costs for hospital, dermatology and oncology appointments.
- Psychological treatment for the impact of the diagnosis and any disfigurement.
- Future losses, including pension shortfall and dependency claims under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 where the prognosis is poor.
The figure in any individual claim depends on the Breslow thickness at the missed appointment, the Breslow thickness at diagnosis, the impact on treatment and life expectancy, and the financial losses.
Making a melanoma claim with Osbornes
We work in three stages.
- Initial review. You tell us what happened. We listen, ask questions, and tell you honestly whether we think there is a claim worth investigating. There is no obligation at this stage.
- Investigation. We obtain your full GP, dermatology and histology records. We instruct an independent dermatologist to review the standard of care, and an oncologist to address what difference earlier diagnosis would have made. This work is funded under a no win no fee agreement.
- Resolution. Most melanoma claims settle out of court once the medical evidence is exchanged. If yours does not, our medical negligence lawyers will issue proceedings and take the case to trial.
You have three years from the date of the negligence, or the date you became aware that negligence may have caused harm, to bring a claim. In melanoma claims, the second date often applies because the link between the missed appointment and the eventual stage at diagnosis only becomes clear later.
Why families choose Osbornes for melanoma claims
Our medical negligence team is led by partner Jodi Newton, whose work on delayed cancer diagnosis claims is recognised by Chambers UK 2026 and Legal 500 2026. Several of our solicitors hold medical qualifications, which means we read dermatology notes, histology reports and oncology records the way an expert witness would.
“They know the law inside out and proactively work with counsel to drive cases forward. They are a go-to for complex claims.”
Chambers UK 2026
We are members of the Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) clinical negligence panel and hold the Law Society Clinical Negligence Accreditation. Both signal specialist expertise in this area of clinical negligence.
Speak to a melanoma claims solicitor today
If you believe your melanoma was missed, misdiagnosed or diagnosed too late, our cancer misdiagnosis lawyers will review your case in confidence and without obligation.
Call 020 7485 8811 or fill in the contact form below.
Melanoma claims FAQs
What is the NICE 7-point checklist for suspicious moles?
NICE NG12 sets out a weighted 7-point checklist that GPs should apply to pigmented skin lesions. The major features (change in size, change in shape, change in colour) score 2 points each. The minor features (diameter 7mm or more, inflammation, oozing or crusting, change in sensation) score 1 point each. A score of 3 or more should trigger an urgent two-week-wait referral.
Can I claim if my dermatologist said my mole was benign?
Possibly. We have acted in cases where a dermatologist reassured the patient that a lesion was benign, the patient returned with worsening changes, and the diagnosis was made too late. The question is whether a reasonably competent dermatologist should have escalated to biopsy, dermoscopy review or further opinion. We would review the records to assess this.
What is Breslow thickness and why does it matter for my claim?
Breslow thickness is the depth of the melanoma measured under the microscope. It is the single most important prognostic factor. A melanoma under 1mm is usually cured by excision alone, with five-year survival above 95%. The same tumour caught months later at 4mm or with lymph node involvement requires more extensive surgery, immunotherapy and carries a far worse prognosis. The difference between those two outcomes is the heart of most melanoma causation arguments.
My melanoma was on my foot. Why was it missed for so long?
Foot, palm and nail-bed melanomas are a subtype called acral lentiginous melanoma. They are rarer than classic mole-derived melanoma, often without obvious pigmentation, and frequently missed in primary care. That is not a defence to a missed diagnosis. NICE NG12 expects suspicious lesions to be referred regardless of location, and acral lesions warrant heightened suspicion precisely because they are easy to dismiss.
How much is a melanoma misdiagnosis claim worth?
Compensation varies with the Breslow thickness at the missed appointment, the thickness at diagnosis, the impact on treatment options and life expectancy, and your financial losses. The Judicial College Guidelines set the general damages brackets, including scarring. Special damages (loss of earnings, private treatment, scar revision, lymphoedema management) often make up the larger share. Fatal claims under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 are valued differently.
How long does a melanoma claim usually take?
Most melanoma claims settle within 18 to 30 months, depending on how quickly the records are obtained, whether the defendant admits breach early, and how the medical experts assess causation. Fatal claims and cases requiring complex life-expectancy evidence can take longer.
Can my family bring a claim if I die from melanoma?
Yes. Close family members can bring fatal medical negligence claims under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 and the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1934. Bereavement damages, loss of dependency and funeral expenses are recoverable. See our dedicated fatal medical negligence claims page.
Will I have to pay anything if my claim does not succeed?
No. We act on a no win no fee basis for all melanoma misdiagnosis claims. If your claim does not succeed, you pay nothing. If it does succeed, our fee is taken from your compensation, capped by the agreement we set out at the start.
Speak to us about a Skin Cancer Claim
Call us 020 7485 8811
For all new enquiries, please submit your details via the contact forms on our website. This will ensure your query reaches the right team and is handled promptly.
Osbornes Law offers experience in obstetric and fatal claims as well as niche cauda equina cases.
The team has particular expertise in cases stemming from delays in diagnosis as well as surgical injury and wrongful birth claims.
Osbornes Law is an established firm which handles a breadth of complex and high-value clinical negligence matters.
They are a very tight team. They're very friendly, helpful and obtain excellent results for clients.
A quality firm of solicitors with excellence at all levels of the team.
They know the law inside out and proactively work with counsel to drive cases forward. They are a go-to for complex claims.
Osbornes handles a wide range of high-value and complex clinical negligence cases, with particular expertise in birth injury, delayed cancer diagnosis, spinal injury, and fatal claims.
I am always happy to get instructions from Osbornes. They have excellent quality work, the team knows exactly what they are doing and are a real pleasure to work with. Excellent legal knowledge.
The team has excellent leadership and provide an above and beyond service for their clients.
A close knit team with excellent knowledge and technical acumen across the board.
You get a real sense that they care about clients and each other, working together to get the best results.
The team works very well together as they are genuinely kind and friendly people.
Osbornes are always professional and diligent in respect of their clients.
Osbornes has an excellent depth of experience across the team.
Across the board, they are all a pleasure to work with. They always keep a pragmatic head and all have an eye on the best outcome for the client.
Small but very effective and experienced team so every client benefits from the personal touch but also highly skilled litigation know-how. Capability of the team means they can handle all aspects of very complex cases as well as straightforward matters.
Osbornes has a skilled team of solicitors advising clients on a wide range of clinical negligence matters.
Hard working, approachable, good knowledge of clinical negligence and clients’ specific conditions
A joy to work with and always 100% client focused at all times.
The clinical negligence team at Osbornes is much lauded for its ability to ‘represent the diverse range of London-based clients
They are an excellent firm who achieve fantastic outcomes for their clients. They are also very prominent in injuries to those travelling to or from Europe. Multiple languages are spoken by the team.
This firm is responsive and efficient. Their rapidity in dealing with complications or hiccups is excellent.
Really great clinical negligence practice, staffed by experienced practitioners who know how NHS Trusts work. They also build great rapport with clients.’
Stephanie has developed a particularly strong reputation for her handling of birth injury claims, as well as cases concerning surgical negligence and delays in surgery.
"An excellent firm which achieves fantastic outcomes for clients."
Osbornes provides a very intimate and personal client service which is increasingly rare in this sector.
The lawyers in the team are highly experienced and will drive cases very hard on behalf of their clients.
"Stephanie Prior... manages a varied caseload, including obstetric claims, child and adult brain injury cases and fatal and non-fatal spinal cord injury cases."
"Stephanie is experienced, knowledgeable of all aspects of clinical negligence work, and strategic in running cases."
"The team were extremely professional in putting my needs first. There was a joined-up approach to catering for the client, and all lawyers involved were briefed and constructive."
Stephanie Prior is always very professional and kind. Highly recommended.
Quite simply excellent, with a highly competent and well-rounded team. They understand complex medical litigation and have been our lifesavers, and we will always owe them our immense gratitude.
Client Stories & InsightsVIEW ALL
- 1.10.2025
Jess’s Rule Rolled Out in England to...
Jess’s Rule establishes a “three strikes and rethink” approach for GP practices to prevent avoidable missed diagnoses deaths. The...
Read more - 13.9.2023
Delayed Basal Cell Carcinoma diagnosis client story
Settlement for delayed diagnosis of Basal Cell Carcinoma We are pleased to have successfully secured a settlement for our client...
Read more - 13.1.2023
Delayed diagnosis of appendiceal cancer
The medical negligence team at Osbornes Law has recently settled a case involving a patient who passed away following a...
Read more - 9.11.2022
Breast cancer screening mammograms and negligence
Breast cancer screening has improved significantly in the UK due to research bettering the understanding of this terrible disease, which...
Read more - 2.9.2020
Cervical cancer misdiagnosis
Cervical cancer misdiagnosis client story Jodi Newton, clinical negligence solicitor Osbornes Law, recently settled a claim for the family of...
Read more - 22.4.2015
Bowel Cancer need not be a killer
Early diagnosis of bowel cancer is key. Cancer is a word that attracts stigma. Many people believe that if you...
Read more
Our Medical Negligence Team View the whole team
Rob Aylott
Partner
Medical NegligenceHugh Johnson
Partner
Medical NegligenceJodi Newton
Partner
Medical NegligenceBen Posford
Partner
Personal Injury SolicitorsLaura Swaine
Partner
Medical NegligenceVictoria Ayton
Paralegal
Medical NegligenceElline Demetriou
Associate
Medical NegligenceHannah Emerson
Solicitor
Medical NegligenceStephanie Evanson
Trainee Solicitor
Medical NegligenceBelen Junqueira
Paralegal
Medical NegligenceNicholas Leahy
Senior Associate
Medical NegligenceAndreea Martin
Paralegal
Medical NegligenceImogen Molloy
Paralegal
Medical NegligenceShivam Raja
Solicitor
Medical NegligenceJosie Robinson
Senior Associate
Medical NegligenceView the
whole team














