NICE revises guidelines on Induced labour

Contact
Table of Contents
Most babies are born naturally at around 40 weeks gestation. However, some pregnancies continue for longer. According to data from the NHS Hospital Episode Statistics/Maternity Services Data set 2019-2020, there are risks associated with a pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks and these risks can increase with each day that passes. Specifically, there are greater chances of a caesarean section being required, as well as the baby needing admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. There is also a greater risk of stillbirth and neonatal death.
Inducing labour
Currently, induced labour, a process that stimulates labour by the administration of drugs, occurs in around 20% of pregnancies in the UK.[2] Induction is usually planned following a discussion between the parents and healthcare professionals, but the ultimate choice of whether or not to be induced lies with the mother.
In addition to being overdue, a pregnancy may be induced if:
- The mother has a health condition such as diabetes or high blood pressure,
- The baby is failing to thrive
- The waters break early, which increases the risk of infection
NICE draft guidance May 2021
For these above reasons, in May 2021 NICE recommended in draft guidance that induction of labour should be offered at a gestation of 41 weeks, overriding previous advice which recommended waiting for 42 weeks. The intention of the change was the hope that earlier induction would result in fewer still deaths and neonatal complications.
NICE, revised guidance November 2021
However, due to the impact of lobbying from various organisations such as Birth rights and the National Childbirth Trust, on 4th November 2021, NICE changed its recommendations on labour induction.
NICE is now advising that women who have reached 41 weeks pregnancy should be told that proceeding with the pregnancy for any longer carries risks and that doctors should, ‘discuss with women that induction from 41 weeks may reduce these risks, but they should also consider the impact of induction on their birth experience’. This means that women will no longer automatically be offered induction at 41 weeks gestation. Instead, the topic will be introduced in the form of a discussion only.
NICE states that simply discussing induction at an earlier stage is likely to, ‘increase the number of women who undergo induction’ but also emphasises that women will be given, ‘every opportunity to go into spontaneous labour’ at term. And, if the mother declines induction, she will be offered increased monitoring of her baby’s health but informed that there is no evidence that this monitoring can prevent poor outcomes.
The revised guidance may be seen as a positive step forward for pregnant mothers who are due to deliver by providing them with reassurance that the risk of a poor outcome is likely to be reduced.
It is of course also up to NHS Trusts to ensure guidelines are being followed by practitioners and based on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection report of the Princess Alexandra Hospital, some NHS Trusts are failing to do this.
The report, released on the 17th November 2021, concluded that this NHS Trust needs to improve in 4 out of 5 quality ratings used by the CQC. The report found significant failings in the hospital’s maternity care and highlighted four areas of improvement including ‘the service must ensure a robust, embedded and audited maternity triage system with appropriate guidance and training to help keep women and babies safe.’
This latest CQC report follows an inspection of another London NHS Trust which was also failing in its maternity care.
Charities support U-turn
Charities welcomed the revision of NICE’s guidelines, claiming that there was no evidence to support that induction would reduce still births. Ann Gibbs, Chief Executive of the charity Birthrights said, ‘conversations around induction must be balanced, evidence-based and respect each individual’s right to make their own choice about what is best for them and their baby.’ The UK’s largest parent charity, the National Childbirth Trust stated, ‘Induction of labour […] has been used much more frequently in recent years and as yet there is inadequate information about longer-term impact on babies and parents’.
Further concerns
Concerns have been raised considering this NICE volte-face. Writing to the Guardian, Catherine Roy, Susanna Haddon and Dr Ruth-Ann Harpur noted that inducing labour at 39 weeks reduces the risk of caesarean section and that the risk of stillbirth increases after 41 weeks gestation. They also noted that neither Birthrights nor the National Childbirth Trust are clinical organisations or service user groups. For this reason, they believe that the lobbyists ‘should not be viewed as the voice of parents, nor deemed qualified to comment on clinical matters’ and that by ‘bowing to the agenda of maternity activists NICE has failed parents’.
At Osbornes Law, we act for many women who have suffered stillbirth; maternal injury or families who have suffered maternal death. Some of these injuries have been sustained after 40 weeks into the pregnancies, and it may be argued that earlier induction may have prevented these injuries from happening. Maternal injuries; stillbirths and maternal deaths have an enormous impact on families – the injuries are often life-changing and cause significant psychological difficulties to the wider family unit as well as the primary injured parties.
To speak with Stephanie Prior in confidence please call us or fill in the online form below and Stephanie will contact you.
Share this article
“Osbornes Law is an established firm which handles a breadth of complex and high-value clinical negligence matters.”
“Osbornes handles a wide range of high-value and complex clinical negligence cases, with particular expertise in birth injury, delayed cancer diagnosis, spinal injury, and fatal claims.”
Speak with Stephanie today
Call us 0207 485 8811
For all new enquiries, please submit your details via the contact forms on our website. This will ensure your query reaches the right team and is handled promptly.
Stephanie Prior is very experienced, with an encyclopaedic medical knowledge. Fights tooth and nail for her clients.
"Lisa Pepper is good at making herself available to clients and has a real focus on finding pragmatic solutions."
Melissa Arnold is very hard-working and more than capable. She gets on brilliantly with clients and is always extremely well prepared.
William Ford "is an astute litigator, and his breadth of knowledge allows him to take a holistic approach to clients’ situations."
“William acts on possession, disrepair and homelessness cases, and has particular expertise in the protection of tenancy deposits under the Housing Act 2004.”
More from JodiVIEW ALL
- 20.4.2026
Sussex Maternity Services Independent Review Announced
Independent review announced for maternity services at University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust On 15 April 2026, Wes Streeting MP announced that the...
Read more - 13.4.2026
Racism in Maternity Care Still Persists
Racism in Maternity Care: Persistent Inequalities and the Urgent Need for Reform Racism in maternity care has once again been...
Read more - 3.3.2026
New Report Exposes Fundamental Failures in NHS Maternity...
Baroness Amos’ interim report lays bare a maternity system “not working for women, babies and families.” Last week the government-commissioned...
Read more - 19.2.2026
Supreme Court Allows Children to Claim Lost Years...
Landmark Supreme Court ruling: children can now claim lost years compensation for medical negligence On 18 February 2026 judgment was handed down...
Read more - 3.12.2025
Liability Secured for Child with Cerebral Palsy
Full admissions of liability secured on behalf of child with quadriplegic cerebral palsy Jodi Newton, Partner in our Medical Negligence...
Read more - 30.10.2025
Addenbrooke’s Hospital Complaints
Review finds harm to children by surgeon at Addenbrooke’s Hospital An independent review by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation...
Read more - 27.8.2025
HSSIB Review Exposes NHS Maternity Failures
Patient safety body HSSIB publishes exploratory review of maternity and neonatal services As Head of Paediatric and Birth Negligence cases...
Read more - 10.7.2025
£700K Settlement for Crohn’s Disease Negligence
Negligent delay in diagnosing Crohn’s disease leads to £700K settlement Jodi Newton, Partner, was instructed in a case against...
Read more - 12.5.2025
Complaints Against Suspended Surgeon Ms Kuldeep Stohr
Ms Kuldeep Stohr, orthopaedic surgeon at Addenbrooke’s Hospital suspended In February 2025, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) confirmed...
Read more - 6.5.2025
Six-Figure Settlement for Negligent C-Section Delivery
Osbornes secures a six-figure settlement following a negligent caesarean section delivery Jodi Newton, Partner and head of our Obstetric and...
Read more - 14.10.2024
Multi-Million Settlement in Cerebral Palsy Negligence Case
Judge awards multi-million settlement in cerebral palsy medical negligence claim Jodi Newton, Partner and specialist medical negligence lawyer at Osbornes...
Read more - 12.9.2024
Great Ormond Street Hospital Negligence & How to Claim
Review of negligence at Great Ormond Street Hospital At Osbornes Law, we’ve supported families through some of the most...
Read more - 29.8.2024
AB v Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust
Background Our client, AB, had been using the Nexplanon contraceptive device for 6 years. She had a Nexplanon device inserted into...
Read more - 30.7.2024
What Is the Role Of a Physician Associate?
What does the Position of Physician Associate Mean for the NHS? There are many different jobs within the NHS, each...
Read more - 9.5.2024
Claim Against Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust...
Client obtains settlement after being victim of a surgical negligence Jodi Newton, Partner in our Clinical Negligence department, recently settled...
Read more - 11.1.2024
New UK Supreme Court Ruling regarding Secondary Victims...
The Supreme Court has today, on the 11th January 2024, upheld the Court of Appeal’s order to dismiss the claims...
Read more - 11.1.2024
Secondary Victim Claims
Secondary victims in clinical negligence cases What is a secondary victim in clinical negligence cases? Most compensation claims are concerned...
Read more - 26.9.2023
Maternity and Neonatal Scandals: Lessons Learned
Will investigations into NHS maternity services lead to real change? Over the past 15 to 20 years, NHS maternity services have come...
Read more - 21.9.2023
Large Compensation for Delayed Laryngeal Cancer Diagnosis
Actress receives financial award after life-changing missed cancer diagnosis. Jodi Newton acted for a client who was belatedly diagnosed with...
Read more - 21.9.2023
Delayed cervical cancer diagnosis client story
Introduction Jodi Newton acted for a woman who died following a delayed cervical cancer diagnosis. The deceased could have been...
Read more - 19.9.2023
Appendicitis Compensation Claim
Appendicitis misdiagnosis case settles for 5-figure sum Osbornes Law were instructed in a medical negligence claim against Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS...
Read more - 19.9.2023
Spinal Fracture Case Settles for 6-figure Sum
Spinal Fractures following cessation of Denosumab injection Case Overview Osbornes Law were instructed in a spinal injury claim against Mid...
Read more - 31.8.2023
Can you sue the NHS for waiting times?
The NHS is facing an unprecedented challenge with 7.47 million people waiting for routine treatments. This crisis impacts everyone, from those...
Read more - 31.8.2023
Hyponatraemia – Symptoms, Causes & Negligence
What is hyponatraemia? Hyponatraemia is a condition where sodium levels fall below a certain level, which can be dangerous. All...
Read more


























