NICE revises guidelines on Induced labour

maternity sign

Contact

Jodi Newton

Table of Contents

Most babies are born naturally at around 40 weeks gestation. However, some pregnancies continue for longer. According to data from the NHS Hospital Episode Statistics/Maternity Services Data set 2019-2020, there are risks associated with a pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks and these risks can increase with each day that passes. Specifically, there are greater chances of a caesarean section being required, as well as the baby needing admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. There is also a greater risk of stillbirth and neonatal death.

Inducing labour

Currently, induced labour, a process that stimulates labour by the administration of drugs, occurs in around 20% of pregnancies in the UK.[2] Induction is usually planned following a discussion between the parents and healthcare professionals, but the ultimate choice of whether or not to be induced lies with the mother.
In addition to being overdue, a pregnancy may be induced if:

  • The mother has a health condition such as diabetes or high blood pressure,
  • The baby is failing to thrive
  • The waters break early, which increases the risk of infection

NICE draft guidance May 2021

For these above reasons, in May 2021 NICE recommended in draft guidance that induction of labour should be offered at a gestation of 41 weeks, overriding previous advice which recommended waiting for 42 weeks. The intention of the change was the hope that earlier induction would result in fewer still deaths and neonatal complications.

NICE, revised guidance November 2021

However, due to the impact of lobbying from various organisations such as Birth rights and the National Childbirth Trust, on 4th November 2021, NICE changed its recommendations on labour induction.

NICE is now advising that women who have reached 41 weeks pregnancy should be told that proceeding with the pregnancy for any longer carries risks and that doctors should, ‘discuss with women that induction from 41 weeks may reduce these risks, but they should also consider the impact of induction on their birth experience’. This means that women will no longer automatically be offered induction at 41 weeks gestation. Instead, the topic will be introduced in the form of a discussion only.

NICE states that simply discussing induction at an earlier stage is likely to, ‘increase the number of women who undergo induction’ but also emphasises that women will be given, ‘every opportunity to go into spontaneous labour’ at term. And, if the mother declines induction, she will be offered increased monitoring of her baby’s health but informed that there is no evidence that this monitoring can prevent poor outcomes.
The revised guidance may be seen as a positive step forward for pregnant mothers who are due to deliver by providing them with reassurance that the risk of a poor outcome is likely to be reduced.

It is of course also up to NHS Trusts to ensure guidelines are being followed by practitioners and based on the Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspection report of the Princess Alexandra Hospital, some NHS Trusts are failing to do this.

The report, released on the 17th November 2021, concluded that this NHS Trust needs to improve in 4 out of 5 quality ratings used by the CQC. The report found significant failings in the hospital’s maternity care and highlighted four areas of improvement including ‘the service must ensure a robust, embedded and audited maternity triage system with appropriate guidance and training to help keep women and babies safe.’

This latest CQC report follows an inspection of another London NHS Trust which was also failing in its maternity care.

Charities support U-turn

Charities welcomed the revision of NICE’s guidelines, claiming that there was no evidence to support that induction would reduce still births. Ann Gibbs, Chief Executive of the charity Birthrights said, ‘conversations around induction must be balanced, evidence-based and respect each individual’s right to make their own choice about what is best for them and their baby.’ The UK’s largest parent charity, the National Childbirth Trust stated, ‘Induction of labour […] has been used much more frequently in recent years and as yet there is inadequate information about longer-term impact on babies and parents’.

Further concerns

Concerns have been raised considering this NICE volte-face. Writing to the Guardian, Catherine Roy, Susanna Haddon and Dr Ruth-Ann Harpur noted that inducing labour at 39 weeks reduces the risk of caesarean section and that the risk of stillbirth increases after 41 weeks gestation. They also noted that neither Birthrights nor the National Childbirth Trust are clinical organisations or service user groups. For this reason, they believe that the lobbyists ‘should not be viewed as the voice of parents, nor deemed qualified to comment on clinical matters’ and that by ‘bowing to the agenda of maternity activists NICE has failed parents’.

At Osbornes Law, we act for many women who have suffered stillbirth; maternal injury or families who have suffered maternal death. Some of these injuries have been sustained after 40 weeks into the pregnancies, and it may be argued that earlier induction may have prevented these injuries from happening. Maternal injuries; stillbirths and maternal deaths have an enormous impact on families – the injuries are often life-changing and cause significant psychological difficulties to the wider family unit as well as the primary injured parties.

To speak with Stephanie Prior in confidence please call us or fill in the online form below and Stephanie will contact you.

Share this article

  • “Osbornes Law is an established firm which handles a breadth of complex and high-value clinical negligence matters.”

  • “The team handles a host of complex maternal claims, including cognitive injuries as a result of delayed birth treatments, cerebral palsy, and vaginal mesh litigation.”

Get Expert Legal Advice Today Our experienced team offers clear, practical advice tailored to your needs Get Expert Guidance

Speak with Stephanie today

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you






    • Stephanie Prior leads the team with real experience and commitment to her clients. Able to spot a good case early on and see it through to conclusion.

      Legal 500 2024

    • Stephanie Prior leads a strong and competent team.

      Legal 500 2024

    • With 10 years of experience as a registered general nurse, stephanie is well placed to support clients through complex and sensitive claims.

      Legal 500 2024

    • Stephanie Prior ‘leads the team with real experience and commitment to her clients’

      Legal 500 2024

    • "Stephanie Prior is very empathetic and practical, she gets to the heart of a case quickly."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Stephanie Prior is highly respected in the marketplace, with a great wealth of experience, superb judgment and medical knowledge that is second to none."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Stephanie has always shown great judgment and common sense whilst building valuable relationships with her opponents."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Stephanie Prior is a standout solicitor."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Stephanie Prior is an experienced lawyer with immense knowledge of her specialism, which allows her to run her cases with strategic precision."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "Stephanie knows her way effortlessly around any clinical negligence issue and has a great strategic mind."

      Legal 500 2023

    • "I know [we have] expressed our appreciation, but I also wanted to thank you for all your hard work, time and patience in pursuing mum’s claim through to a successful outcome - your kind and professional approach was genuinely appreciated."

      Client review

    • “May I take this opportunity to thank you for your patience and true compassion in yet another very tough year of representation on the behalf of my wife. I certainly must say you did it all with amazing stamina and positivity which regenerated my self-esteem…. You honestly eased the pain and I can see a healing process ahead.”

      Client

    • Stephanie has developed a particularly strong reputation for her handling of birth injury claims, as well as cases concerning surgical negligence and delays in surgery.

      Chambers UK

    • "Stephanie Prior takes on complex cases and gets excellent results. She has a background in medicine which serves her clients well and is a realistic but tough litigator."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie Prior is hugely dedicated, adored by her clients, tenacious, efficient and extremely knowledgeable."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie Prior is very good with troubled clients and is easily able to make them feel at ease."

      Legal 500 2021

    • "Stephanie shows sensitivity and deals with things in an understanding way."

      Chambers UK 2021

    • The lawyers in the team are highly experienced and will drive cases very hard on behalf of their clients.

      Legal 500 2020 - Clinical Negligence

    • "Stephanie Prior has a realistic attitude to the complexities of the cases. She wins the trust of her clients and goes the extra mile to ensure they get the best outcomes."

      Legal 500 2020 - Stephanie Prior

    • Stephanie’s background in medicine gives her an ability to read between the lines where medical records and expert evidence are concerned and is a great asset.

      Legal 500 20202 - Stephanie Prior

    • "Her knowledge base is second to none and her understanding of the litigation process stands out, as does her ability to work collaboratively."

      Chambers UK

    • "Stephanie Prior... manages a varied caseload, including obstetric claims, child and adult brain injury cases and fatal and non-fatal spinal cord injury cases."

      Chambers UK

    • "Stephanie is experienced, knowledgeable of all aspects of clinical negligence work, and strategic in running cases."

      Chambers UK

    • "Key team members include the approachable, compassionate and efficient Stephanie Prior."

      The Legal 500

    • Stephanie Prior is always very professional and kind. Highly recommended.

      Medical Negligence Client

    • Stephanie Prior is ‘very warm’ and ‘caring’, and an ‘exceptional professional’.

      Legal 500

    • Stephanie Prior continues to receive widespread praise from clients, who state that she explains the legal aspects of the case very clearly, and she is also a caring person who handles cases on a personal level.

      Chambers UK

    More from JodiVIEW ALL

    1. pediatric hospital
      13.3.2025

      Addenbrooke’s Hospital Complaints

      Review finds harm to children by surgeon at Addenbrooke’s Hospital An independent review by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation...

      Read more
    2. Hospital sign MATERNITY
      14.10.2024

      Multi-Million Settlement in Cerebral Palsy Negligence Case

      Judge awards multi-million settlement in cerebral palsy medical negligence claim Jodi Newton, Partner and specialist medical negligence lawyer at Osbornes...

      Read more
    3. surgeon
      12.9.2024

      Great Ormond Street Hospital Negligence & How to Claim

      Review of negligence at Great Ormond Street Hospital At Osbornes Law, we’ve supported families through some of the most...

      Read more
    4. flowers in a field
      29.8.2024

      AB v Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust

      Background Our client, AB, had been using the Nexplanon contraceptive device for 6 years. She had a Nexplanon device inserted into...

      Read more
    5. Physician Associate
      30.7.2024

      What Is the Role Of a Physician Associate?

      What does the Position of Physician Associate Mean for the NHS? There are many different jobs within the NHS, each...

      Read more
    6. surgery
      9.5.2024

      Claim Against Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust...

      Client obtains settlement after being victim of a surgical negligence Jodi Newton, Partner in our Clinical Negligence department, recently settled...

      Read more
    7. supreme court ruling
      11.1.2024

      New UK Supreme Court Ruling regarding Secondary Victims...

      The Supreme Court has today, on the 11th January 2024, upheld the Court of Appeal’s order to dismiss the claims...

      Read more
    8. Supreme Court Ruling pic
      11.1.2024

      Secondary Victim Claims

      Secondary victims in clinical negligence cases What is a secondary victim in clinical negligence cases? Most compensation claims are concerned...

      Read more
    9. Ambulance UK
      12.12.2023

      NHS Compensation Payouts Guide

      What Are NHS Compensation Payouts? In the UK, the National Health Service delivers the vast majority of healthcare services. When...

      Read more
    10. Cancer treatment in a modern medical private clinic
      21.9.2023

      Large Compensation for Delayed Laryngeal Cancer Diagnosis

      Actress receives financial award after life-changing missed cancer diagnosis. Jodi Newton acted for a client who was belatedly diagnosed with...

      Read more
    11. Fatal Medical Negligence Claim
      21.9.2023

      Delayed cervical cancer diagnosis client story

      Introduction Jodi Newton acted for a woman who died following a delayed cervical cancer diagnosis. The deceased could have been...

      Read more
    12. hospital
      19.9.2023

      Appendicitis Compensation Claim

      Failure to diagnose appendicitis case settles for 5-figure sum Stephanie Prior was instructed in a claim against Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS...

      Read more
    13. model of a spine
      19.9.2023

      Spinal Fracture Case Settles for 6-figure Sum

      Spinal Fractures following cessation of Denosumab injection Case Overview Stephanie Prior was instructed in a spinal injury claim against Mid...

      Read more
    14. waiting
      31.8.2023

      Can you sue the NHS for waiting times?

      The NHS is facing an unprecedented challenge with 7.47 million people waiting for routine treatments. This crisis impacts everyone, from those...

      Read more
    15. baby
      31.8.2023

      Hyponatraemia – Symptoms, Causes & Negligence

      What is hyponatraemia? Hyponatraemia is a condition where sodium levels fall below a certain level, which can be dangerous. All...

      Read more
    16. Ambulance vehicles at the Royal London Hospital
      10.8.2023

      Ambulance Delays Affecting Rapid Patient Treatment

      Failure to Meet Ambulance Response Targets In 2017, the Secretary of State for Health accepted the new ambulance performance standards recommended...

      Read more
    17. Fatal Medical Negligence Claim
      1.8.2023

      Bowel Ischaemia Fatality – Client Story

      Jodi Newton, a Partner in the Clinical Negligence Department at Osbornes Law, has recently settled a long running fatal medical...

      Read more
    18. private hospital
      26.7.2023

      Private Healthcare Negligence

      Can you claim medical negligence against a private hospital? Yes – it can be a little more complicated than bringing a...

      Read more
    19. new born baby
      9.6.2023

      Early Notification Scheme – is it helping or failing...

      What is the Early Notification Scheme? The NHS Early Notification Scheme (“ENS”) has reached its sixth anniversary. Established in April 2017,...

      Read more
    20. pregnant lady
      23.3.2023

      Private Pregnancy Scans and Substandard Care

      In the news, it has been reported that private clinics that offer pregnancy scans to women are not meeting the...

      Read more
    21. water
      9.2.2023

      Perineal tear claim settles for 6-figure sum

      Successful claim for mother with third-degree perineal tear Osbornes Law recently settled a birth injury claim for a woman who...

      Read more
    22. hands of surgeon
      14.12.2022

      Successful settlement for negligent care during kidney transplant...

      Claimant v Royal Free London NHS Trust Osbornes have reached a settlement agreement on behalf of a Claimant who brought...

      Read more
    23. The doctor looks at the x-ray
      9.11.2022

      Breast cancer screening mammograms and negligence

      Breast cancer screening has improved significantly in the UK due to research bettering the understanding of this terrible disease, which...

      Read more
    24. Hospital sign MATERNITY
      21.9.2022

      Are maternity services safe? – Part 2

      In April last year I wrote a piece about government setting up a taskforce to look into why there are...

      Read more

    VIEW ALL