Personal Injury Discount Rate

15 Jul 2018

Couched as The Civil Liability Bill, the government aims to introduce new legislation to address the so-called US style ‘compensation culture’ they believe has emerged over recent years. As reported by the Association of British Insurers online, these changes are necessary as evidenced by this statistic: since 2005, road accidents have fallen by nearly 30% but personal injury motor claims are up 40%.

The Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords on 27th June 2018 and now goes to the House of Commons for consideration.

What is the Bill about?

According to the Law Society Gazette, the new Bill will ban offers to settle compensation claims without medical evidence as support. It will also introduce a fixed tariff on the maximum amount of compensation payable for whiplash injuries. The ultimate aim is to, ‘crack down on fraudulent whiplash claims’ with a consequent reduction of motor insurance premiums for drivers of around £35.

The Government states that the Civil Liability Bill will, ‘tackle the rampant compensation culture and reduce the number and cost of whiplash claims [… to ensure that there is…] a fair, transparent and proportionate system of compensation in place, for damages paid to genuinely injured personal injury claimants […in order to…] put money back in the pockets of motorists through reduced insurance costs’.
However, there is another aspect to the Bill, which aims to make changes to the way the personal injury discount rate is set.

What is the personal injury discount rate?

The Discount Rate is used when calculating future losses in large personal injury claims.  A future loss is calculated by multiplying a multiplicand (the loss per year) by a multiplier (reflecting the number of years into the future that the loss will be incurred).

The theory behind applying a Discount Rate to the multiplier is that by receiving a lump sum for future losses, the claimant will be able to achieve an annual rate of return upon that sum by investing it.  Were a Discount Rate not applied this would potentially lead to overcompensation.

Wells v Wells

The Discount Rate is set by the Lord Chancellor, following the House of Lords case of Wells v Wells [1999] 1 A.C. 345, in which it was held that the Discount Rate should be based on the assumption that as a risk-averse investor a personal injury claimant would invest their damages in Index-Linked Government Stock (ILGS).  As a result the Discount Rate would reflect the annual rate of return achievable from investing in ILGS, and reduce the multiplier in a future loss calculation accordingly.

The problem with this situation is that before the recent change, the Lord Chancellor last set the Discount Rate in 2001 to reflect the annual rate of return then available on ILGS at 2.5%.  As time has passed the real rate of return available on ILGS has decreased, particularly following the world financial crisis in 2008, as risk free, secure investments have become more and more difficult to find, and the yield available on them has shrunk.

As a result personal injury claimants have been under-compensated for their future loss claims, as multipliers have been reduced by a Discount Rate set in 2001 reflecting a rate of return on ILGS which in reality has been completely unachievable.  Therefore, following a Judicial Review by APIL, in February 2017 the Lord Chancellor amended the Discount Rate to -0.75% from 20th March 2017 in order to reflect the current reality of investing in ILGS.

A negative Discount Rate now has the effect of increasing the multiplier used to calculate future loss rather than decreasing it.  This has had the effect of increasing the value of personal injury claims with a future loss element overnight, often by as much as 100% or more.

In reality, the negative Discount Rate only reflects the gap between the current rate of return available on ILGS and the increasing rate of inflation making, for example, the cost of care, more and more expensive for a personal injury claimant reliant upon care for the rest of their lifetime.

The decreased discount rate

However, the insurance industry is highly critical of the change, primarily because the adjustment resulted in an increase in insurers’ potential liabilities in the event of a personal injury compensation payout. Indeed, the Director General of the Association of British Insurers was quoted in the Telegraph, ‘the minus 0.75% rate would be a bigger hit to insurers’ finances than all of the flooding in the North of England put together’.

In addition to these complaints from the insurance industry, in May 2018 Lord Keen told the House of Lords that because damages awards were currently averaging around 120% of the true value of injuries, review was urgently needed. Those who represent claimants point out that this figure is entirely fabricated and shows a misunderstanding of what is necessary to ensure fair and full compensation to those who have suffered life-long injuries through no fault of their own.

So what happens now?

The Civil Liability Bill means that the Lord Chancellor may consider setting different discount rates for different cases, taking into account tax, inflation and investment advice costs. It recommends that the first review of the rate will be announced within 90 days of the commencement of the Civil Liability Act and future reviews will be carried out every 3 years.  The Bill seeks to establish a new principle that claimants must be expected to invest in “low risk” investments, rather than the lowest risk investments

In order to make any decision on the discount rate, the Lord Chancellor will be advised by an expert and independent panel. The aim will be to devise a rate that is fair and protects the interest of claimants. It is anticipated that the modernisation of the discount rate calculation will reflect how claimants really invest their money. In addition, the government hopes that the 3 year review interval will give clarity to claimants and to those who underwrite the costs.

Increased discount rate in the pipeline

In light of concerns from the insurance industry and Lord Keen, the government intends to review the discount rate as soon as possible. It plans to increase the rate and therefore reduce compensation awards. The insurance industry at least is relieved with this plan: as reported in Insurance Business Magazine online, ‘the proposed new framework for the discount rate is to be welcomed […as it will…] accurately reflect the way injured people invest their compensation awards’. Those who represent claimants however regard this as an attack on the principle of full compensation, which is to put the claimant back in the position they were in before an accident in as far as possible. Given that the government is also the largest compensator in the country due to NHS blunders, their proposal also sees a clear conflict of interest in setting the basis for compensation awards.

To speak with a lawyer in our Personal Injury team, please contact us on 020 7485 8811 or fill in an online form.

Share this article

Speak to us

For a free initial conversation call 0207 485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you






    • “Andrew handled a very complex, 3 year legal battle for me, with a tremendous amount of patience and professionalism. He is very approachable, always kept me up to date, by phone and e-mail, and responded very quickly to my queries with excellent advice, sound strategic thinking and strong letters to put the other side under pressure. With top contacts for barristers, joint experts and mediation, Andrew secured me the best financial settlement for my claim. He is a credit to Osbornes Solicitors.”

      Client review

    • “Excellent assistance with a damages claim related to a traffic accident including fairly lengthy negotiations with an insurance company and arrangements for medical rehabilitation.”

      Client review

    • “Andrew Middlehurst did the bulk of the work in a polite, professional and communicative manner, especially as things stalled several times. If I were to be involved in another similar situation, I wouldn’t hesitate to use them again. It was the London Cycle Campaign that pointed me in their direction and it was a good call.”

      Cyclist injured in a road traffic accident.

    • “Excellent assistance with a personal injuries claim after I was hit by a car driver while I was cycling. Andrew Middlehurst was very professional and communicative, answered queries quickly and kept me informed regularly on the case’s progress. His advice was easy to understand and a good result was achieved. I would recommend Osbornes highly and in particular Andrew Middlehurst.”

      Cyclist injured in a road traffic accident

    • “I’d like to thank you for all your help in bringing this case to a successful conclusion. Your communication via mail, email, and phone was timely and clear throughout. I am extremely satisfied with the advice I was given and the outcome that was achieved. I would not hesitate to recommend you and your firm to others.”

      Robert Wicke, Cyclist injured in a road traffic accident

    News & InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. bicycle wheel
      30.5.2022

      Injured London cyclist receives settlement and medical treatment

      Cycling accident lawyer, Laura Swaine, recently settled a claim for an injured cyclist who sustained serious injuries to her wrist...

      Read more
    2. highway code bike lights
      5.5.2022

      Top 10 Major Highway Code Changes for Cyclists

      New Highway Code rules for cyclists At the end of January 2022, the Highway Code was updated to make British roads...

      Read more
    3. E Bicycle
      4.5.2022

      Settlement reached for cyclist client after insurers deny...

      Personal Injury specialist, Laura Swaine, recently settled a cycling injury claim following the driver fleeing the accident site and refusing...

      Read more
    4. Ambulance
      28.2.2022

      Client left with brain injuries after car accident...

      Our Spanish client was the front seat passenger in a car driven by her husband which was involved in a...

      Read more
    5. accidente de bicicleta
      25.1.2022

      Successfully settled claim for cyclist struck by London...

      Andrew Middlehurst, a specialist cycling injury lawyer, has settled a claim for a cyclist who was struck by a black...

      Read more
    6. 20.1.2022

      What to do immediately after a cycling accident?

      If you have been involved in a cycling accident, you may experience shock and disorientation at the scene. Depending on...

      Read more
    7. 9.1.2022

      Settlement secured for head injury caused by hammer...

      Osbornes Law has secured a £100,000 settlement for her client who suffered serious head injuries after being attacked in prison by...

      Read more
    8. 24.11.2021

      Ben Posford named catastrophic injury lawyer of the...

      Osbornes Law are delighted to announce that Ben Posford has been named as ‘Catastrophic Injury Lawyer of the Year’ at...

      Read more
    9. school children writing
      17.11.2021

      £270,000 settlement for school accident

      Osbornes Law secures a £270,000 settlement for a Polish woman who slipped as a schoolgirl on a wet floor at school....

      Read more
    10. shopping bags
      17.11.2021

      £100,000 settlement for tripping at work

      Osbornes Law secures £100,000 settlement for Hungarian woman who tripped over a shopping bag at work Siobhan McIvor, a Partner in...

      Read more
    11. factory worker
      17.11.2021

      £165,000 settlement for factory accident

      Siobhan McIvor, a Partner in the Personal Injury Department of Osbornes Law, has secured a £165,000 settlement, with the help of...

      Read more
    12. house builders
      16.11.2021

      Significant lump sum for below the knee amputation

      Mr N, a Romanian man in his 30s, came to the UK to work with his father-in-law in early 2018. He...

      Read more
    13. 5.11.2021

      Seven figure leg amputation settlement

      Mr S was walking across the yard at work when he was run over by a forklift truck from behind....

      Read more
    14. Ambulance vehicles at the Royal London Hospital
      26.10.2021

      Examples of Serious Head & Brain Injury Settlements

      C–v-N Child pedestrian crossing road knocked over by car when running into road sustaining a traumatic brain injury and...

      Read more
    15. man riding motorcycle
      6.10.2021

      Multi-Million Settlement After Motorbike Accident

      Our lawyers achieved a £5m settlement for a 54-year-old man following a motorbike accident. As a result of the accident,...

      Read more
    16. 23.9.2021

      Croydon Tram Crash Inquest Recommendations Welcomed

      The families of victims killed in the Croydon tram crash today welcomed a coroner’s recommendations to prevent another tragedy....

      Read more
    17. 16.9.2021

      The law around E-bikes and E-scooters explained

      Why are electric bikes legal but not scooters? E-bikes and e-scooters are the new rides on the block. To many,...

      Read more
    18. cycling in london
      14.9.2021

      Claim Settled for £70,000

      Andrew Middlehurst, specialist bicycle accident lawyer at Osbornes Law, has settled a claim for an injured cyclist in the region...

      Read more
    19. 31.8.2021

      Client pursuing head injury claim after life changing...

      A young woman has told of the moment her head was completely scalped and lost her ear when her hair...

      Read more
    20. 26.8.2021

      Osbornes Sponsor Leading Medico-Legal Conference

      Osbornes Law is delighted to be the principal sponsor of the Cambridge Annual Medico-Legal Conference. This year conference, which is...

      Read more
    21. red moped
      9.8.2021

      Motorcycle Accident Case Settles for £400,000

      Mr C, an Italian man working in a 5 star London hotel was riding a moped home from work at night...

      Read more
    22. red motorcycle
      9.8.2021

      Motorcycle accident case settles for £90,000

      Mr H was a hard-working security operative. He and his wife both worked full time and they were planning to...

      Read more
    23. 2.8.2021

      London Tube Sign Causes Head Injury

      Serious brain injury claim after falling London tube sign knocks pedestrian unconscious. An airline pilot ‘miraculously’ survived after a 20kg...

      Read more
    24. 22.7.2021

      Croydon Tram Crash Inquest Concludes

      Families of Croydon tram crash victims disappointed by Inquest conclusion The families of victims killed in the Croydon tram crash...

      Read more

    VIEW ALL