Do you have to wear a bike helmet?28 Feb 2023 | Sam Collard
Should bike helmets be mandatory in the UK?
Recently, Dan Walker was involved in a nasty collision with a motorist while riding his bike. The incident left the former BBC breakfast presenter with a bruised and bloodied face but luckily, he escaped without suffering any head injuries. Praising his helmet for saving his life, Walker has suggested a new slogan for cycling campaigners – “Don’t be a helmet, wear a helmet.”
While there’s no doubt that cyclists are vulnerable when sharing the road with fast-moving cars and multi-tonne HGVs, the debate around helmets is far from clear-cut. Some believe they are an integral component of road safety and cyclists shouldn’t leave home without one. Others, including former racing cyclist Chris Boardman, said the focus on helmets is a distraction from better things we could be doing to make the roads safer for cyclists.
The safety data is complicated
There are good reasons for and against wearing helmets on the roads.
ROSPA, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, cites a number of studies to show that cycle helmets can significantly reduce the risk of direct-impact injury to the head, brain and upper face, by as much as 88% in some cases. We won’t go through all the studies here but there’s plenty of data to support the safety – and often life-saving – aspect of cycling helmets. For example, the Dutch Road Safety Research Foundation estimated that there would be 85 fewer fatalities per year if all Dutch cyclists wore helmets. For context, the number of cyclist deaths in the Netherlands hovers around 200 each year, so that’s a 42% decrease in deaths.
However, while the protective ability of helmets is improving all the time, we’re not at a point where helmets are effective in every scenario. Multiple studies show that cycle helmets offer decreasing protection the faster the cars get and are of little use in collisions with cars travelling at more than 31 mph.
Another interesting study from the Netherlands found that 13.3% of Dutch cyclists who were hospitalised after an accident were wearing helmets, despite fewer than 1% of Dutch cyclists wearing helmets overall. So the jury’s out on whether helmet use leads to safer cycling.
Legislation may discourage people from cycling
What happens when you force cyclists to wear helmets? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand suggests that helmet-wearing is a barrier to cyclists and could hurt cycling numbers overall. In both countries, the number of people cycling dropped by up to 23% when mandatory helmet laws were introduced. The same cannot be said for countries that don’t require helmets – the Netherlands is famous for its high rate of bike use despite the absence of a helmet law.
A drop in cycling activity is associated with fewer people engaging in physical activity which can have negative health impacts. But perhaps more significantly, it undermines the “safety in numbers” effect – the idea that the more people there are on bikes, the safer it is to be on a bike. That’s because motorists are more aware of cyclists and take greater care.
This has prompted some to question whether we should be focusing less on the helmet debate and more on improving road safety, for example, by widening cycle lanes and creating more cycling paths to separate cyclists from fast-moving traffic.
Cycle helmet law in the UK
Wearing a helmet whilst cycling is not a legal requirement in the UK. Both Transport for London and the Highway Code do recommend helmets for cyclists, but it’s not mandatory. As things stand, adults have the freedom to make their own choice about whether or not they want to wear them.
However, there may be consequences for not wearing a helmet.
If you are injured when cycling and it is someone else’s fault, you would be able to claim compensation. For serious injuries, such as a lifelong brain injury where you are unable to work, the amount of compensation can be significant. But it’s important to know that the court could reduce your compensation if you were not wearing a helmet and the court believes this contributed to your injuries. This is known as contributory negligence.
Contributory negligence is a common defence strategy in cycling compensation claims. If it’s argued, the court will consider whether you failed to take reasonable care for your own safety and, if so, what would have happened had you been wearing a helmet. The court has the power to reduce your award to reflect your portion of responsibility. For example, if the court thinks that not wearing a helmet made you 50% responsible for your injuries, then it will reduce your award by 50%.
Each case is decided on its own facts. The courts will consider the type of road, traffic speed, nature of the impact and so on, to determine if wearing a helmet would have made a difference. But the bottom line is, you may not recover enough money to meet your future care needs if you are found to be contributorily negligent, which can be devastating.
To wear or not to wear a helmet
We acted for a claimant who suffered a serious head injury in a bicycle accident. The defendant’s lawyers contended for a 25% reduction in damage because he was not wearing a helmet, but to succeed with that claim they had to show firstly that he owed a legal duty to wear a helmet and secondly that a helmet would have prevented the injury. There is currently no good legal precedent that a cyclist is mandated to wear a helmet (although it is encouraged as a good and safe practice), and secondly, the impact was to the front of the head – an area where a helmet offers little protection – and so the defendant was not able to show that a cycling helmet would have made a difference.
It’s impossible to come to a definitive conclusion on whether cyclists should wear helmets or not. The evidence is inconclusive and there are valid arguments both for and against wearing them. But if you are involved in a collision and do not wear a helmet, and wearing one would have lessened your injury, you could be faced with the consequences of reduced compensation. Ultimately, it’s up to every individual cyclist to know the risks and decide for themselves.
How Osbornes Law can help?
Our expert cycling accident lawyers can help if you have been involved in a collision. Our dedicated team will work to ensure you receive the appropriate medical care and financial compensation, taking into account and time of work and additional travel expenses you may have incurred. We specialise in helping people who have suffered life-changing injuries after a crash, including brain and spinal injuries. We are the exclusive legal partners of the London Cycling Campaign and have been advising their members for nearly 10 years.
To find out if we can help please fill in the form below and a team member will be in touch.
Speak to us about a cycling accident claim.
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Cycling News & InsightsVIEW ALL
Do you have to wear a bike helmet?
Should bike helmets be mandatory in the UK? Recently, Dan Walker was involved in a nasty collision with a motorist...Read more
Top 10 Major Highway Code Changes for Cyclists
New Highway Code rules for cyclists At the end of January 2022, the Highway Code was updated to make British roads...Read more
Cycling accident advice
Now more than ever before, people are embracing the pleasures and benefits of cycling in and around London. Unsurprisingly, the...Read more
The law around E-bikes and E-scooters explained
Why are electric bikes legal but not scooters? E-bikes and e-scooters are the new rides on the block. To many,...Read more
Bike Boxes – what are the rules?
Cycle boxes at traffic lights I read a post recently on a London cycling forum in relation to some confusion...Read more
Highway Code changes just the start in protecting...
The 2020 changes to the Highway Code do not go far enough to change driver behaviour and protect cyclists and pedestrians,...Read more
Helmet Cameras: Personal Safety and the Law
Helmet cameras have become one of the must-have items for cyclists, especially those commuting to and from work. They offer...Read more
Bike Cam Prosecutions
Have you ever been cut up by a van turning left? Or been riding along only to find the tarmac...Read more
Boom time for bikes – London Mayor’s new...
Yesterday Sadiq Khan unveiled his ‘London Streetspace’ programme designed to transform London’s streets to accommodate a possible ten-fold increase...Read more
Cycling accidents involving potholes
If a cyclist is injured as a result of a pothole or defect on the road they were travelling on...Read more
Do I need insurance for cycling?
There is no legal requirement for cyclists to hold insurance cover in order to cycle in the UK. That includes...Read more
Intimidatory driving to become breach of traffic law?
A new driving offence of ‘intimidatory driving’ is being considered by the government to crack down on close passes by...Read more
Can a ‘bike backie’ get you in trouble?
London’s controversial mayor Boris Johnson has been caught by The Sun newspaper giving his lawyer wife Marina Wheeler a...Read more
Ealing cyclists up in arms over latest death
After 51-year-old Met Police officer, Claudia Manera was killed in a bike accident at the junction of The Broadway and...Read more
The risks and rewards of cycling in London
Stuart Kightley of Osbornes solicitors asks the question: is cycling in London good for your health? I acted for a...Read more
Cyclists, Roundabouts and the Highway Code
The Highway Code is more than just a guide to how to pass your driving test. It is intended to...Read more