9.6.2022
Trusts of Land
What are trusts of land? Property ownership is not always a straightforward legal issue, particularly where the parties are cohabitees...
Read moreRory Matheson
Rory is a solicitor in the firm’s Property Litigation, and Housing & Social Care departments.
Rory is a passionate housing and social welfare solicitor who is dedicated to getting the best outcome for his clients. He works with a lot of vulnerable clients with urgent cases, and prides himself on explaining key issues without resorting to “legalese”.
He specialises in housing and public law cases, dealing with matters ranging from homelessness to housing disrepair. He has represented clients in Welfare Benefits matters at the First Tier Tribunal, as well as appeals to the Upper Tribunal. He also acts in community care matters, including children’s rights cases and obtaining reasonable adjustments for people with disabilities.
Rory has a particular interest in public law cases, and acted in the first successful appeal against a refusal to award Discretionary Housing Payment in R (on the application of Halvai) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham [2017] EWHC 802. He is a member of the executive of the Junior Housing Lawyers Practitioners Association (HLPA). He joined Osbornes as a paralegal in 2015 and qualified as a solicitor in 2020.
“We deal with many incredibly vulnerable clients who are often torture survivors. Over the years we have dealt with many solicitors and we feel that Rory is by far the best for a number of reasons. He is efficient, he seems to work in a parallel universe which has more hours than we do. He communicates every new event that happens to our clients and to us and asks for our support when needed. He really works in partnership with us. He gets our clients immediately and chases up every due date, is continually proactive and very importantly has won pretty much all our cases.”
Rory’s notable cases
- O, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2016] EWHC 937 – A Judicial Review where the High Court set out detailed guidance on when a public body can draw an adverse inference from prior dishonesty.
- R (on the application of Halvai) v London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham[2017] EWHC 802 – The first successful appeal in the High Court against a local authority’s decision to refuse to grant Discretionary Housing Payments to an extremely vulnerable tenant.
- Raufi v LB Islington.The County Court at Central London, 22.5.2018 – A successful County Court appeal against a decision that a homeless applicant did not have a priority need for housing on the basis that he was significantly more vulnerable as a result of various medical conditions. Unusually, the County Court varied the local authority’s decision to one that the applicant was in priority need for housing.
- R (on the application of AS, by his litigation friend Mr Francesco Jeff of the Refugee Council) -v- Kent County Council[2017] UKUT 446 – Rory was part of the team working on this matter, where the Upper Tribunal determined the unreliability of dental expert evidence when assessing the ages of unaccompanied asylum seeking putative children.
Property Litiation InsightsVIEW ALL
8.6.2022Right to Light Law
Right to Light Law in the UK Property owners have a legal right to light as set out in the...
Read more
8.6.2022Landlords and the Dangers of Rent-to-Rent
Rent-to-Rent refers to the practice of landlords letting a whole property to a tenant (usually a limited company), which is...
Read more- 30.5.2022
The uncertainties of beginning a building project now
The construction industry is seeing a perfect storm at the moment with labour shortages following Brexit and material costs which...
Read more - 9.11.2021
Can I still claim adverse possession?
The principle of “adverse possession” commonly known as “squatters rights” is a principle which allows a person who does not...
Read more 
5.10.2021Buying a property where a Party Wall Award...
Buying a house with a party wall agreement Buying a property can already be a stressful process but finding out...
Read more- 26.6.2021
The Risks Of Buying Properties Off Plan!
The Daily Mail reported recently that 300 families a week are having to move into shoddy newly built homes. Not all...
Read more 
7.5.2021Costly clauses missed by lawyers in leasehold contracts
A mum has been left facing a bill of millions of pounds a year for the ground rent of her...
Read more- 7.8.2020
House buyers and sellers should be wary of ‘...
Property raffles are a legal minefield and many are too good to be true, according to a leading lawyer. There...
Read more - 7.8.2020
Property Litigation lawyer, Shilpa Mathuradas quoted in Inside...
House buyers and sellers should be wary of ‘too good to be true’ property raffles Shilpa Mathuradas, Head of Property...
Read more - 20.5.2020
Frustration and Force Majeure – Does COVID-19 operate to...
In these unprecedented times, many business owners may be wondering if there is any way that they can cancel or...
Read more 
18.2.2020Overlooking Nuisance Claims – Buy some net curtains!
Last week saw the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the decision not to allow the Neo Bankside residents’ an injunction to...
Read more
6.2.2020‘Glass in Hand’ Lecture – Should we be nervous...
Hampstead residents will be able to find out about their legal rights when trees damage or overhang their property, next...
Read more- 11.10.2019
Government eviction reforms “risk increasing delays”
Government plans to end so-called ‘no fault’ evictions – and at the same time expand what amounts to a good reason...
Read more - 13.8.2019
Squatting-will the new law provide homeowners with increased...
On Saturday 1 September 2012 a new law came into force which makes squatting in a residential building an offence punishable by...
Read more - 13.8.2019
Court Grants Damages For Japanese Knotweed Infestation
The recent case of Williams v Network Rail Infrastructure [2017] has set an important precedent when dealing with Japanese knotweed. Property...
Read more - 13.8.2019
EMA Decision: Brexit Does Not Frustrate Commercial Property...
The largely anticipated decision in the case of Canary Wharf v The European Medicines Agency has now been given. Judge...
Read more - 12.8.2019
Basement developments- How to fight back
Basement developments are growing ever more popular, particularly in wealthy London boroughs, leaving homeowners fearful that neighbours’ excavation projects will...
Read more - 18.7.2019
New Builds, Poor Standards!
This week’s Dispatches programme looked at allegations of shoddy standards, poor customer care and excessive profits being made by...
Read more - 9.7.2019
EMA Decision: Brexit Does Not Frustrate Property Lease
The EMA’s appeal against the decision of the Order of Mr Justice Smith that Brexit would not frustrate the...
Read more - 8.7.2019
LEASEHOLD REFORM – GOVERNMENT RESPONDS
Last year the government invited views on how they should tackle exploitative practise in the leaseholder sector. They have now...
Read more - 10.4.2019
Tenant Fees Act 2019 – Landlords & Letting Agents be Warned
On 12 February 2019, the Tenant Fees Bill received Royal Assent and comes into effect on the 1 June 2019 The Act prevents landlord...
Read more - 25.3.2019
Court case has serious consequences for landlords recovery...
On the 21st December 2012 the High Court handed down its judgment in the case of Phillips & Godard -v- Francis &...
Read more 
23.9.2018The Frustrating Implications of Brexit!
Landlords up and down the country are awaiting the outcome of the case between European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) and Canary...
Read more
