Post-Adoption Contact With Birth Parent: Not If Adopters Oppose

Contact
Table of Contents
Post-Adoption Contact With Birth Parent
It is not uncommon for a birth parent to seek direct contact with an adopted child – but in what circumstances might the court allow this to happen? Until recently, contact between birth parents and adopted children was not recommended, but the tide could be turning in favour of more openness – if safe to do so.
The specialist adoption solicitors at Osbornes Law are experienced in supporting birth parents and adoptive parents, including issues relating to direct and indirect contact post-adoption.
A recent ruling, in which the judge severely criticised the local authority for its inaction, is helpful in illustrating the current challenges for a birth parent seeking direct contact.
Impact of adoption
Judges make adoption orders only if there is no other realistic option that will protect the welfare of the child. In other words, adoption is a last resort with significant consequences for all the parties: the birth parents lose all parental responsibility for the child – and the adoptive parent/s acquire parental responsibility.
The order is unique for its finality and only in rare cases will an adoption order be revoked.
However, a birth parent may be able to apply for permission to seek direct contact post-adoption under the Adoption Act 2002 s51A. The Act sets out the relevant factors to be taken into account, including any risk of harm of any disruption to the child’s life and any representations made by the child or adoptive parents to the court.
What happened in this case?
The birth mother (BM) wanted direct contact once or twice a year with a 4-year-old girl, who had been adopted in early 2024 without her consent.
At a hearing in the month following the making of the adoption order, the court was handed a report from CAMHS which opposed direct contact. Given that BM and the adoptive mother (AM) had agreed to meet, the post-adoption contact application was adjourned to allow CAMHS to do further work with the little girl.
By the time of the final hearing, AM was not opposed to direct contact in principle but felt that now was not the time for it to start.
The judge noted the long-standing principle that a court should not order post-adoption contact with the birth family against the adopters’ wishes, except in “exceptional circumstances”. By the time s51(A) was inserted in 2014, there had been a move towards more openness in post-adoption contact – but not in cases where the adopters opposed contact.
The judge also noted a report published last November from the Public Law Working Group’s adoption sub-committee. The committee recommended that “there needs to be a greater focus on the issue of contact with the birth family as long as it is safe.” The committee went further, calling for a “sea change” in approach to the issue.
No direct contact
It was the judge’s view in this case that to grant BM’s application would cause an almost guaranteed risk of harm to the child. She would, for example, be destabilised and emotionally derailed and the relationship between her and AM could be jeopardised.
There was also the need for the child to enjoy stability in her placement and to continue her work with CAMHS. A crucial factor was AM’s opposition to immediate direct contact. The judge considered that future direct contact may be possible but, for now, indirect contact and life story work would be sufficient.
Local authorities vital in adoption cases
While the work of a local authority in adoption cases is vital, the judge heavily criticised the London Borough of Southwark which he said had let down the child as well as AM and BM.
There had been an “unacceptable” absence of any proper progress on the life story work which had (among other problems) delayed any opportunity for the time to arrive when direct contact between BM and the child could be seriously considered.
Such was the judge’s concern that he felt the local authority had simply “walked away from the issue of contact”. He directed the local authority to finalise its life story work by the end of January 2025.
How we can help
While there could eventually be a greater willingness to allow direct contact post-adoption, this case illustrates the difficulties in securing it in practice – particularly if the adoptive parents oppose contact. The child’s welfare needs, both in the short and long term, will be court’s paramount consideration.
To speak to an adoption lawyer, Naomi Angell, or a member of her team please:
- Call us on 020 7485 8811, or
- Fill in the online form below.
Share this article
“Naomi Angell is the fount of all knowledge on adoption and surrogacy cases. She is a lawyer to whom judges defer.”
“Naomi is very knowledgeable on adoption and surrogacy. She is solution-focused and open to ideas.”
Speak to us about Post-Adoption Contact
Call us 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
The firm’s alternative parenting team is headed up by Naomi Angell, handling domestic and international adoption, surrogacy, and fertility issues.
Naomi Angell has considerable strength in adoption, surrogacy and fertility issues
Naomi Angell is a renowned practitioner in the market with a wealth of experience in family cases involving immigration issues. She has a depth of knowledge in surrogacy issues and is respected for her experience handling adoption matters.
"She is responsive and very knowledgeable – she knows everything on the family law side of adoption and is also very generous with her time."
"Naomi is second to none in her knowledge of adoption and her work in surrogacy is also a strength."
"She has an encyclopaedic knowledge and an in-depth understanding of this work. She's extremely empathetic and can put herself in the client's shoes. She's also very strategic and is good at pre-empting litigation."
"Their family department is very strong, from adoption to child abduction and matrimonial finance, this is a very strong team."
"Naomi Angell is a stand out individual who is well regarded as to the go-to lawyer in her field. What Naomi doesn’t know about adoption is not worth knowing."
"She is the queen of inter-country adoption. She is experienced in the field over a long period of time. She has wonderful client skills and is committed to getting proper outcomes."
"She is an adoption superstar. She has an encyclopaedic knowledge of immigration law, and knows what's on the horizon due to her involvement in policy."
Naomi Angell – the doyenne of adoption and surrogacy family law, dedicated to her clients and hardworking.
The team has considerable strength in adoption, surrogacy and fertility matters through Naomi Angell.
"Highly recommended
Bridget and Amy-Jo were very supportive during what were very stressful proceedings. They were collaborative and I felt listened to and part of a team rather than just a client. We ended up being successful at the hearing.""She's extremely knowledgeable and highly professional."
"She is the guru when it comes to international adoption and she's an expert in her field."
Naomi Angell has a vast wealth of knowledge and experience.
"Naomi Angell is a highly esteemed practitioner who is highlighted as "a leader in the field" and "extremely knowledgeable" by interviewees. She is particularly recognised for her experience in complex adoption disputes."
Bridget Thompson is a public law specialist noted for her extensive practice in matters involving alternative families and adoption. An interviewee observes: "She's a fighter, she's clever, and she understands all aspects of a case."
"Naomi Angell is a leading name in international adoption."
"Recognised for its expertise in both domestic and international adoption, as well as assisted conception."
"Naomi Angell is a leading figure in domestic and inter-country adoptions, and also has expert knowledge of related fertility and surrogacy issues."
"Naomi Angell is phenomenal. She's done it for so long and knows so much that she's a fount of knowledge. If Naomi doesn't know something, it isn't worth knowing."
Naomi Angell is the doyenne of inter-country adoption and the font of all knowledge in this area.
Highly respected for her [Naomi Angell] focused on cross-border children work, including surrogacy matters.
Naomi Angell advises on international adoptions and complex surrogacy matters. She is commended for her broad, in-depth experience."
Naomi Angell is an expert in adoption issues.
Naomi Angell leads the market in cross-border children law matters. Sources confirm that she is "at the cutting edge of changing law and policy" when it comes to international adoption
Naomi Angell is described as hugely experienced, calm and a good listener.
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
- 23.1.2025
A High Bar For Challenging Adoption Orders
Challenging adoption orders Adoption orders bring considerable implications for all the parties and judges do not make such orders lightly....
Read more - 17.11.2023
Public Law Working Group Interim Report on Adoption...
Time for change? A recent interim report has been published by the Public Law Working Group Adoption Sub-Group (‘the Group’)...
Read more - 31.8.2022
What if my partner predeceases me before we...
A review of a recent case concerning consent during fertility treatment. When going through fertility treatment as a couple, it...
Read more - 31.8.2022
Declaration of parentage after mistake at register office
Recently in the news has been the outcome of the case of Osborne & Anor v Cambridgeshire County Council [2022] EWHC 1982 (...
Read more - 2.8.2022
New strategy to make fertility treatment more accessible
In July 2022, the Department of Health for England released its strategy aimed at improving Women’s Health. While women represent 51%...
Read more - 5.7.2022
Proposed Changes to Gamete Donor Anonymity Laws in...
The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has proposed changes to the law surrounding gamete donor anonymity in the UK....
Read more - 20.10.2021
Birth parent fails to overturn adoption order
Most adoption applications go through smoothly and it is only in the minority of cases that birth parents seek to...
Read more - 25.3.2019
Russian Adoptions
Adopting a baby from Russia can give a chance of a family to a child who would otherwise spend their...
Read more