New landmark set in the Time Provision for Inheritance Act claims29 Jan 2020 | Jan Atkinson
In the judgment of the case of Thakare v Bhusate  EWHC 52 (Ch) handed down recently, the High Court upheld a widow’s right to bring a claim against her husband’s estate more than 26 years after the grant of probate was issued. It is a new landmark in the length of time Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claims can be brought after death.
Mrs Bhustate was granted permission by Chief Master Marsh to bring a claim out of time (nearly 25 years after the date of the grant of probate), partly on the basis of her acrimonious relationship with her stepchildren which had obstructed the house sale.
Mr and Mrs Bhustate married in India in 1979. Mr Bhustate (61) was twice previously married with five children and Mrs Bhustate (28) spoke little English. The couple lived in London and had one child before the husband died intestate in 1990. Their matrimonial home failed to sell with Mrs Bhustate continuing to live there with her son.
The stepchildren appealed against the court’s decision to permit the ‘out of time’ claim to be brought, arguing reasonable financial provision had already been made for their stepmother at the time their father died. They claimed it was her own ‘fault’ that she lost the entitlement to bring a claim.
Dismissing the appeal, Mr Edwin Johnston QC concluded it was not appropriate to interfere with the Chief Master’s decision. He also stated that the ‘administration of the estate was left in limbo’ as a result of a lack of co-operation from the stepchildren.
It is encouraging that the High Court has upheld the widow’s rights in this case and thereby ensured that justice was not thwarted by conduct.
Jan Atkinson Partner
Contact us today
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
Contentious Probate Case Studies
Contentious probate involving business assets Osbornes Law acts for the defendants to a claim issued to pronounce in favour of...Read more
Inheritance Claims CFA Success Fee Judgment
The Court of Appeal upholds the recoverability of CFA success fees in 1975 Act claims in the case of Hirachand v...Read more
Contentious Probate Dispute Surrounding Interpretation
The ‘nil rate band’ offers an incentive to testators to make their will in a tax-efficient manner, maximising the amount...Read more
Handwriting Expert Witness Concludes Will Forgery
It’s not unheard of for an individual to forge someone’s will with the aim of securing an inheritance....Read more
Funding of Probate disputes
Probate disputes can be very expensive and clients often find it difficult to find the money to cover their legal...Read more
Dealing with a Contentious Probate Claim
Many people do not know what a contentious probate claim is until they have become embroiled in one. The root...Read more
New landmark set in the Time Provision for...
In the judgment of the case of Thakare v Bhusate  EWHC 52 (Ch) handed down recently, the High Court upheld a...Read more