Is Overlooking a Nuisance? Supreme Court to Decide 24 Dec 2020 | Shilpa Mathuradas
Is overlooking a nuisance? The Neo Bankside residents granted permission to go to the Supreme Court
In February 2020 the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the decision not to allow the Neo Bankside residents an injunction to close part of the Tate Modern’s viewing gallery. The residents have now been granted permission for a final appeal to the Supreme Court.
You will recall that five residents launched a nuisance action claiming that they were under constant surveillance from visitors to the gallery who were looking into their homes and posting photographs on social media. This they claimed was a breach of their human rights and interfered with their enjoyment of their flats. They state that there is little to view from the platform apart from Neo Bankside.
Previously the High Court had said that overlooking could in theory constitute a nuisance but dismissed the residents claim. The appeal was dismissed on the basis that overlooking does not fall within the tort of nuisance. They commented that subject to planning permission being given an owner can actually create windows that overlook a neighbour’s property. The Court of Appeal commented that there are other laws that protect privacy and are better able to weigh up the interests of parties than the Courts.
No date has been set for the matter to be heard by the Supreme Court but it is likely to be in 2021 and it will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court agree with the Court of Appeal given the far-reaching ramifications.
For more information on Overlooking Nuisance Claims, read Shilpa Mathurada’s recent blog here.
Contact us today
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
More from ShilpaVIEW ALL
26.6.2021The Risks Of Buying Properties Off...
The Daily Mail reported recently that 300 families a week are having to move into shoddy newly built homes. Not all...Read more
9.12.2020Business eviction ban extended
The Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick announced today (9th December 2020) that business owners affected by the pandemic will have protection from...Read more
7.8.2020Property Litigation lawyer, Shilpa Mathuradas quoted...
House buyers and sellers should be wary of ‘too good to be true’ property raffles Shilpa Mathuradas, Head of Property...Read more
7.8.2020House buyers and sellers should be...
Property raffles are a legal minefield and many are too good to be true, according to a leading lawyer. There...Read more
20.5.2020Frustration and Force Majeure – Does COVID-19...
In these unprecedented times, many business owners may be wondering if there is any way that they can cancel or...Read more