Reasonableness of Service Charges
Shilpa MathuradasTable of Contents
Reasonableness of Service charges under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
It is well known that the relevant costs that a landlord incurs in the provision of services, repairs improvements, maintenance or insurance under the terms of the lease must be considered when determining the amount of service charges payable by the leaseholder for a period including those under shared ownership schemes.
Under section 19(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 service charges must be
(1) reasonably incurred; and
(2) where they are incurred on the provision of services or carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard.
Objective standard of reasonableness
It is also well known that the “reasonableness” must be determined on an objective standard of reasonableness and not the lower standard of rationality.
The case of Assethold Ltd v Adam and others [2022]
This test was considered in the case of Assethold Ltd v Adam and others [2022] in which leaseholders were issued with a service charge demand which included a sum of £28,000 for the cost of waking watch for the building. From October 2019 to August 2020 surveyors were commissioned by the managing agents to inspect the building for the purpose of health, safety and fire risk assessment. The external walls of The building were not found to present a significant fire risk.
However, in January 2021 a further external walls risk assessment was commissioned by the surveyors who had carried out the inspection in 2020. The surveyors concluded that combustible materials were present in external walls and this presented an “intolerable” risk with consequences of a fire. The remedial action recommended that an extended alarm system or a waking watch be implemented. The freeholder opted for the latter option.
Tribunal considers reasonableness
The leaseholder applied to the Tribunal where the reasonableness of the decision making process was considered. It was stated that where two course of action were available the landlord did not have to opt for the cheapest. The leaseholders produced expert evidence that the freeholder’s action were not reasonable. Relying on this evidence The First Tier Tribunal concluded that the finding in the 2021 report was wrong given the vast difference between the 2021 report and the earlier reports and the freeholder should have commissioned a further report and acted unreasonably in not doing so. As a result they found the costs of the waking watch were unreasonable given that it was based on a report that was wrong.
Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
The freeholder appealed on the basis that the question of what the freeholder should do is subject to a rationality test. An objective test of reasonableness applied to the price only. The Upper Tribunal disagreed and determined that the landlord’s choice of “what to do” required an objective assessment of whether the landlord had followed a reasonable decision- making process adopted a reasonable course of action. In the alternative they argued that if the objective standard of reasonableness was the correct test, the First Tier Tribunal had misapplied the same. The Upper Tribunal agreed.
It determined that the freeholder has acted properly in relying on 2021 report as it was from a reputable firm who specialised in fire safety. They also acted reasonably in putting in place a waking watch. The Upper Tribunal stated that the First Tier Tribunal has placed reliance on leaseholder’s expert and had therefore considered the issue with the benefit of hindsight. The First Trier Tribunal should have considered the issues on the information available at the time the costs were incurred and not a later date.
Contact Our Expert Team for Advice on Service Charges
If you’re a landlord or leaseholder dealing with issues related to service charges our property dispute specialists can provide expert guidance on service charges and lease terms.
To speak with one of our solicitors, contact us by:
- Filling in our online enquiry form; or
- Calling us on 020 7485 8811
Share this article
Contact
Contact us about Service Charges
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
“Shilpa is knowledgeable and helpful. She is not afraid to challenge the boundaries for her clients, with excellent results.”
“Shilpa combines the fierce representation of her clients’ best interests with the reasonable and constructive attitude that the Court always looks for in modern litigation. She has invaluable tactical awareness and skilfully handles complex and unusual cases and difficult opponents. As a barrister it is a pleasure to be instructed by her because you so often find that she has already taken the steps that you would have recommended had you been the client’s first point of contact. Her preparation of cases for trial is extremely thorough and helps ensure a positive result before you have set foot in Court.”
“Thank you so much for your help. You were efficient, clear and advised me well in addition to being very pleasant to work with.”
“I would like to sincerely thank you for all the hard work in assisting me to resolve my rather unusual and complicated case. Last 2 years were very stressful and intensive and often only your professional approach and personal realistic but positive attitude helped me not to give up. The uncertainty weight of more than 10 years is off my shoulders thanks to you and your colleagues. Thanks once again for your legal advice, time, and efforts”.
“Mostly I am grateful that Shilpa was understanding about the delays caused by my illnesses, and that she stuck with me and got a good deal for my tenancy. I did feel she fought to protect me and my rights. I appreciate that she kept me informed about progress, sending copies of emails with the other side and consulting me when necessary. I appreciated her eye for detail on legal matters and how she stood firm against a somewhat tricky opposing solicitor.”
“Shilpa was very thorough in the advice she provided and I was immediately put at ease with her involvement. She works hard to achieve the agreed objective and I very much appreciate her help in my matter.”
“Shilpa was very diligent in her attention to detail and her pursuit of all necessary documentation; she showed great determination in the face of many requests by the other party’s solicitor to let certain things slide. She was thorough and professional which gave us a great sense of security.”
Shilpa really helped us take charge of the situation and helped resolve this property dispute. I would not hesitate to recommend her or the team to anyone in a similar situation.
On first meeting Shilpa I was sure that she understood immediately my requirements, and was sympathetic both to my financial restraints and my emotional state. She achieved everything I asked of her and proved to be invaluable, professional and efficient
At every step Shilpa alleviated any concerns and stresses we had. Always fast to respond, always professional and super knowledgeable.
Shilpa has helped us through some key property litigation matters (residential and commercial) since 2014 and has delivered on every occasion. One particular issue had kept us in a state of stress and tension for almost a decade and after getting in touch with Shilpa she was able to help us bring the matter to a peaceful and successful conclusion.
I received a call from Shilpa Mathuradas a couple of hours after filling the enquiry form for a callback. She actively listened to my party wall concerns responding with gentle professionalism, answering my concerns, letting me know what is and is not possible and when best to bring in a solicitor. All this within 10 minutes. Excellent.
If I had another reason to have to seek legal advice again, I wouldn’t hesitate to use Shilpa, and would recommend her to anybody who needed legal advice.
Shilpa was professional, realistic, and unflappable. Shilpa managed to persuade a reluctant witness to come forward to support my case. She obviously knows her subject very well.
I always had full confidence in Shilpa keeping my best interests at heart. I often didn’t understand the legal language, and she would follow this up with a phone call and patiently explain.
Property Litigation InsightsVIEW ALL
- 3.12.2024
Beneficial Interest in Property
What does beneficial interest in property mean? A beneficial interest in property gives someone the right to share the benefits...
Read more - 18.11.2024
Rent Repayment Orders
Guidance for Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) for Landlords in the UK Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) are legal orders requiring a...
Read more - 13.11.2024
Evicting a Tenant
How to evict a tenant: Guidance for landlords Evicting tenants is rarely straight forward . It is a challenging and complex...
Read more - 16.10.2024
Managing Litigants: Court Powers and Defendant Options
How can the court control a litigant? Most people wish to live out their lives without the need to face...
Read more - 15.10.2024
How do you determine a boundary?
Whether the boundary dispute relates to a rear garden boundary or whether it relates to a driveway, the issue of...
Read more - 14.10.2024
Can You Challenge a Restrictive Covenant?
Challenging a restrictive covenant! Is it obsolete? It is well known that section 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 allows...
Read more - 7.10.2024
Disabled Woman Wins £34,000 Benefits Case
The Background to the Case In 2019 Ramona Cerbu was crossing the road when she was hit by a car and...
Read more - 2.9.2024
Transferring a Council House Tenancy to a Family...
Tenancy Succession Rules The loss of a loved one is always a difficult time. It is important that time is...
Read more - 30.7.2024
Single Mother Wins in High Court Homelessness Challenge
Claim for judicial review against Redbridge Council This case involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against...
Read more - 15.7.2024
How To Deal With Rent Arrears
What can I do if I am struggling to pay off rent arrears? There are many reasons why one might...
Read more - 16.4.2024
When can you challenge public body decisions about...
An introduction to public law Public law governs the relationship between public bodies, such as central government or local government,...
Read more - 16.4.2024
Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children
Age is just a number? Shining a light on Local Authorities’ Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children A recent report...
Read more - 5.4.2024
DWP Exposed for £32,000 Underpayment of Disability Benefits
Osbornes Law has assisted a vulnerable client to recover underpaid disability benefits totalling over £32,000. Our client, a disabled young man,...
Read more - 22.3.2024
The Renters Reform Bill
A Review of the Renters Reform Bill The 2019 Conservative Manifesto made a commitment to end “no fault evictions”. This has...
Read more - 22.3.2024
Client successful in TOLATA proceedings
The case related to proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (“TOLATA”) in respect of joint...
Read more - 23.1.2024
Case Reiterates Local Authorities should follow Allocation Scheme
R (on the application of Kukhtyak) -v- London Borough of Hounslow [2023] EWHC 2914 (Admin) This sad case concerned an elderly couple...
Read more - 23.1.2024
Freehold Service Charge Disputes
Service Charges & the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill was introduced to Parliament on 27...
Read more - 23.1.2024
Know your Rights (of Way)
If you have a question or concern over a right of way on your property, it is important to seek...
Read more - 23.1.2024
Party Wall Etc Act 1996 v Common Law
The case of Power & Kyson & Shah [2023] EWICA Civ 239 The case of Power & Kyson & Shah [2023] EWICA Civ 239...
Read more - 7.12.2023
Supreme Court sets High Threshold for Local Authorities...
Judgment was handed down on 28 November 2023 by the Supreme Court in an important case regarding the main housing duty. The...
Read more - 27.10.2023
The Building Safety Act 2022
Introduction to the Building Safety Act 2022 This much awaited Building Safety Act 2022 was introduced into Parliament on 5th May 2021 as...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Gatekept homeless teenager accommodated by local housing authority
Miss X, a 17 year old whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, left her family home in March 2022 following...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Homelessness case successfully settled for elderly disabled lady
Ms X, whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, had been living in a privately rented one-bedroom flat for...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Disrepair Claim for Single Father
Background to the Claim Osbornes Law represented a private tenant, a single father living with his young son in their...
Read more