2.4.2025
Significant Damages Secured in Disrepair Case
Significant Damages for Disrepair secured following breach of Court Order Our client approached Osbornes Law having previously brought a disrepair...
Read moreWhen can you challenge public body decisions about policies?
Table of Contents
An introduction to public law
Public law governs the relationship between public bodies, such as central government or local government, and private individuals. Public bodies, including government ministers, must comply with the law and if they fail to do so this can be challenged by way of judicial review in the High Court.
What are policies?
Policies – sometimes called guidance or procedure – exist to guide decision makers, and can help private individuals to understand how a public body will approach their case.
By way of example, the Home Office has a policy governing how it allocates accommodation to destitute asylum seekers. Local authorities have policies concerning when they will award Discretionary Housing Payment or when they will impose charges for adult social care.
Policies are not law and as such do not bind public bodies, but issues relating to policies often arise in judicial review claims. Case law says that a policy should be followed by a decision maker, unless there is a good reason to depart from it.[1] If a policy has not been properly considered or has been wrongly applied by a decision maker, then this is a basis on which to seek judicial review of a decision.
Secret policies
Public bodies should make their policies publicly available, so private individuals know where they stand. This also helps ensure that an individual has an opportunity to make meaningful representations before a decision is made about them. If policies are kept secret, the failure to publish the policy can be a cause of action in judicial review.[2]
Challenging policies
Policy documents themselves can also be challenged by way of judicial review, for example if a policy contravenes the public body’s legal duties under the Human Rights Act 1998 or the Equality Act 2010. If these cases are successful, the High Court can decide that a policy (or part of a policy) should be ‘quashed’, usually meaning it would need to be withdrawn or rewritten.
Until recently, policies could be challenged if there was an unacceptable risk that they would lead a decision maker to act unlawfully. The scope for these sorts of challenges has been reduced in the last few years, following Supreme Court cases.[3] In R (A) v SSHD [at 46] the Supreme Court clarified the three types of cases where a policy may now be found to be unlawful for misrepresenting the law:
“(i) where the policy includes a positive statement of law which is wrong and which will induce a person who follows the policy to breach their legal duty in some way…..; (ii) where the authority which promulgates the policy does so pursuant to a duty to provide accurate advice about the law but fails to do so ….:; and(iii) where the authority, even though not under a duty to issue a policy, decides to promulgate one and in doing so purports in the policy to provide a full account of the legal position but fails to achieve that…”.
This narrows the scope for challenging the lawfulness of government policies.
The court in A nevertheless emphasised the important fact that if a public body has breached their legal duty and acted unfairly, regardless of whether the unfairness was produced by the application of a policy or not, then an individual is of course entitled to seek redress.
How can we help?
Osbornes Law are experienced in advising on judicial review matters, including challenges to central and local government decision making, and issues relating to policies. If you have been treated unfairly by a public body and would like advice on whether judicial review is the appropriate remedy, you can contact us for specialist advice on 020 7485 8811.
[1] See R (Nadarajah) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1363 and R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245
[2]R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] 1 AC 245
[3]R (A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2019/0065, R (BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department UKSC 2019/0147
Share this article
“The housing team at Osbornes is the best in England.”
“The lawyers at Osbornes Law work with passion, putting in all their best.”
Contact us today
Related InsightsVIEW ALL
6.3.2025Housing Cases: When Vulnerability Affects Capacity
When does vulnerability become an issue of capacity in housing cases? Things to consider Many clients seeking housing advice from...
Read more- 30.1.2025
Osbornes Wins Judicial Review on Legal Aid Fees
Osbornes successful in judicial review of Lord Chancellor over legal aid fees for Welfare Benefits On 28 January 2025 the High Court...
Read more - 13.1.2025
Osbornes Law Secures Mental Health Support for Asylum...
Home office backs down over decision to deny mental health support to suicidal torture victim seeking asylum The Home Office...
Read more - 7.11.2024
New DWP Scheme: Refunds for Recoverable Hardship Payments
Sanctioned Universal Credit claimants may be entitled to refunds of Hardship Payments following announcement of new DWP scheme The Department...
Read more - 7.10.2024
Disabled Woman Wins £34,000 Benefits Case
The Background to the Case In 2019 Ramona Cerbu was crossing the road when she was hit by a car and...
Read more - 2.9.2024
Transferring a Council House Tenancy to a Family...
Tenancy Succession Rules The loss of a loved one is always a difficult time. It is important that time is...
Read more - 30.7.2024
Single Mother Wins in High Court Homelessness Challenge
Claim for judicial review against Redbridge Council This case involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against...
Read more 
15.7.2024How To Deal With Rent Arrears
What can I do if I am struggling to pay off rent arrears? There are many reasons why one might...
Read more
16.4.2024Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children
Age is just a number? Shining a light on Local Authorities’ Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children A recent report...
Read more- 5.4.2024
DWP Exposed for £32,000 Underpayment of Disability Benefits
Osbornes Law has assisted a vulnerable client to recover underpaid disability benefits totalling over £32,000. Our client, a disabled young man,...
Read more - 23.1.2024
Case Reiterates Local Authorities should follow Allocation Scheme
R (on the application of Kukhtyak) -v- London Borough of Hounslow [2023] EWHC 2914 (Admin) This sad case concerned an elderly couple...
Read more - 7.12.2023
Supreme Court sets High Threshold for Local Authorities...
Judgment was handed down on 28 November 2023 by the Supreme Court in an important case regarding the main housing duty. The...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Gatekept homeless teenager accommodated by local housing authority
Miss X, a 17 year old whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, left her family home in March 2022 following...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Homelessness case successfully settled for elderly disabled lady
Ms X, whose details are anonymised to protect her privacy, had been living in a privately rented one-bedroom flat for...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Disrepair Claim for Single Father
Background to the Claim Osbornes Law represented a private tenant, a single father living with his young son in their...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Client successfully rehoused following refusal by local authority
Background to the case Osbornes Law represented a client who had been found intentionally homeless by his local authority. He...
Read more - 28.9.2023
Client rehoused and £16,000 arrears cleared
Osbornes Law were instructed to assist a client to suspend a warrant for possession. The client had fallen into arrears...
Read more - 26.9.2023
Victory for Homeless Victim
Mr X, whose details are anonymised to protect his privacy, fled his home country due to severe persecution from the...
Read more 
13.9.2023Successful homelessness judicial review case against Redbridge Council
This matter involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against Redbridge Council for failure to comply with...
Read more
13.7.2023Family Unlawfully Evicted Receives Damages of £22,000
Case Summary: Unlawful Eviction Claim Against Private Landlord This matter involved an unlawful eviction claim brought by our clients against...
Read more
21.4.2023Success in Court of Appeal in child disability...
The Court of Appeal has today handed judgment in the case of Harrington v Secretary of State for Work and...
Read more- 20.1.2023
High Court finds Westminster Council’s Housing Scheme...
Westminster City Council’s housing allocation scheme found to be unlawful The High Court has today handed down judgment finding...
Read more - 14.11.2022
Housing allocation case questions lawfulness of council’s...
Until February 2022, the social housing allocation scheme for the London Borough of Newham allowed people who lived outside the borough...
Read more
