Bereavement Damages Award and hopes for wider change

24 Apr 2020 | Nicholas Leahy

Personal injury and clinical negligence lawyers have for a long time complained that the level of bereavement damages, which was until recently capped by statute at £12,980, is too low.

The Government’s recent announcement that the cap is to rise to £15,120 for causes of action accruing after 1 May 2020 is, therefore, a welcome one, but still does not adequately reflect the severity of fatal accidents and the devastating effect that they have on the close relatives of the deceased.

Last year, in the case of Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, the Court of Appeal held that bereavement awards should be extended to cohabitees who had lived with the deceased for 2+ years prior to their death, and that the law as it stood at that particular time was incompatible with Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the protection from discrimination).

Whilst this change has yet to be approved by both Houses of Parliament, it is widely expected to be so later this year.

Wider changes for bereavement damages?

The case of Smith led to some optimism amongst claimant lawyers that wider changes would be made to the law on bereavement damages, perhaps to something more like the system in Scotland, where cases are assessed on an individual basis. However, in February of this year, the new Conservative government announced that it had no such plans. It said: “the existing system involving a fixed level of award and clear eligibility criteria represents a reasonable, proportionate and practical approach.” The Government went on further to state that bereavement damages were only ever meant to be a token payment available to a limited group of people.

It seems then that those who frequently represent bereaved families will need to continue campaigning for the wider changes which they believe are needed (such as widening the scope of relatives eligible to claim and assessing cases on a more individual basis).

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has indicated that it intends to keep on campaigning for change, and at Osbornes Law we wholeheartedly support this campaign.

Related Services:


Share this article


Contact us today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    More from NicholasVIEW ALL

    1. hospital bed

      Osbornes Successfully Settle Wrongful Birth Claim

      Nicholas Leahy, clinical negligence lawyer at Osbornes Law has recently negotiated the successful settlement of a wrongful birth case. Our...

      Read more
    2. 13.7.2021

      Nick Leahy Acts For Family In...

      Nick Leahy, medical negligence solicitor at Osbornes Law was instructed to pursue a claim on behalf of the estate of...

      Read more
    3. 23.6.2021

      NHS Plans To Centralise Patient Medical...

      Recent news coverage has highlighted the growing concern over plans by NHS Digital (which runs the NHS’s IT system)...

      Read more
    4. 18.5.2021

      Failure to diagnose and treat Ogilvie’...

      Our client  suffered the consequences of a delayed diagnosis of Ogilvie’s syndrome following the birth of her daughter by...

      Read more
    5. 18.5.2021

      Failed to identify nerve damage caused...

      The Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law have this week successfully negotiated the settlement of a case in which our...

      Read more
    6. 29.10.2020

      Medical Negligence Case Study: Iron infusion...

      Nick Leahy, Solicitor in Osbornes Clinical Negligence team recovered damages for his client who suffered an extravasation injury following an...

      Read more