Financial Cases on Divorce – The Resurrection of Calderbank Offers?4 Sep 2019 | Lisa Pepper
When a couple divorce, they are encouraged by the Courts to consider other dispute resolution options such as mediation: before embarking on expensive financial proceedings at Court to settle their financial separation.
Cost Statements for Financial Proceedings on Divorce
If instead, the parties end up in financial Court proceedings on divorce, at every hearing they are both required to provide each other with costs estimates (Form H) and 14 days before the Final Hearing, a more detailed costs estimate (Form H1). These Forms can be found on the Court Service website. They focus everyone’s minds on the costs incurred as the proceedings continue (frequently the costs double between each hearing).
Offers to Settle
In financial proceedings at Court, until April 2006, Calderbank offers could be made. In April 2006, Rule 2.71 was introduced into the Family Procedure Rules 1991 (as they then were) bringing in the current No Order as to Costs presumption, later maintained in the Family Procedure Rules 2010. These rules are the framework in which the lawyers, the Judges and the clients must work within the Court.
A Calderbank offer was an offer of financial settlement made “without prejudice save as to costs”. Other than at the Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing, the Judge hearing the case would not be allowed to be told what that offer was. The sting in the tail was where the Court decides the case at the final Financial Hearing (many cases settle before this). If the case fights all the way to a final hearing, and if, say, the husband had made a Calderbank offer to the wife, which she refused, and the Judge awarded her less than the husband’s offer, then she was at risk of paying the husband’s costs from 28 days after the offer was made, on top of her own. This used to put quite a lot of pressure on a party receiving a Calderbank offer to consider it seriously and to be quite confident before they continued their case through the Courts, seeking more.
The Family Procedure Rules Committee Costs Working Group has launched a consultation seeking views as to whether the 2010 Family Procedure Rules should be amended to take into account Calderbank offers as conduct when the Court is considering making an order requiring one party to pay the costs of the other party. A link to the consultation can be found here.
Current position on costs
The current rule on costs is under Family Procedure Rules 2010 r 28.3 This sets out the issues the court should have regard to if it is to make a costs order:
- Failure to comply with the rules, an order or relevant practice direction
- Any open offer to settle
- Whether it was reasonable for a party to raise, pursue or contest a particular allegation or issue
- The manner in which a party has pursued or responded to the application or a particular allegation or issue
- Any other aspect of a party’s conduct in relation to the proceedings which the Court considers relevant
- The financial effect on the parties of any costs order.
It’s not back to the old days
Taking into account Calderbank offers as conduct, is not as “black and white” in terms of costs penalties as the old rules, which provided that (my emphasis): “the court must unless it considers unjust to do so, order that other party to pay any costs incurred after the date beginning 28 days after the offer was made”.
The change would not mean that the general ‘no order’ rule set out in FPR 2010 r.28.3(5) should change or be deleted. The consultation states that “in this way, excessive weight ought not to be attached only to whether one party has ‘won’ or ‘lost’ but proper account could be taken of whether either party has acted reasonably or unreasonably in the course of their negotiations (including those undertaken “without prejudice save as to costs”) having regard to all of the matters to which the court is required to have regard under FPR 2010 r.28.3(7) when deciding whether it is ‘appropriate’ to make an order requiring one party to pay the costs of another party having regard to ‘conduct of the party in relation to the proceedings’ under FPR 2010 r.28.3(6)”.
The national member organisation consisting of family lawyers and other professionals committed to the constructive resolution of family disputes has also asked for its members to complete a survey on the matter, a link to which can be found here.
If the spirit of Calderbanks is introduced to the costs rules it will be interesting to see if this leads to the earlier settlement of financial cases on divorce in Court.
Contact us today
For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Insights from our Divorce LawyersVIEW ALL
My ex has cut me off during divorce
Unfortunately, it is far too common that when a client says it’s over, their spouse with the “purse strings”...Read more
How the Court views loans from parents during...
A frequent issue in financial divorce cases is a loan from a spouse’s parent, often to pay legal fees,...Read more
Mesher Orders Explained
What is a Mesher order? A Mesher Order allows the sale of the family home to be postponed in a...Read more
Divorcing couples reaching financial settlement through Private FDR
The Runaway Advantages of the Private FDR Our specialist lawyers are keen to ensure our divorcing clients achieve cost-effective outcomes...Read more
Negotiating financial settlements in divorce
Costly and acrimonious divorces: a lesson in what not to do If you’re determined to pursue your financial claims...Read more
Uncovering hidden assets in your divorce
Hiding Assets During a Divorce As part of your divorce, you and your ex will have to agree on how...Read more
I helped build my spouse’s career
What is the impact on our divorce settlement? It’s been almost two years since The Da Vinci Code author...Read more
6 cases that shape your divorce settlement
Part of what makes our divorce lawyers experts in their field is knowing what way a judge is likely to...Read more
Divorce in your 60s – The Financial Implications
How common is a divorce in your 60s? The latest divorce figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) show...Read more
Tax implications for divorcing couples
As the end of the Stamp Duty holiday looms on 31 March 2021, that is not the only deadline that separating and...Read more
When can you claim PPR Relief on more...
Family lawyers are familiar with ‘Mesher Orders‘ where the court orders that as part of the financial settlement on divorce,...Read more
Setting aside a financial remedy order
What has been the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on financial remedy orders? Can you do it at all? Barder...Read more
Divorcees could appeal financial settlements if they lose...
Billions of pounds have been wiped off shares as uncertainty builds amid the coronavirus crisis, but what does this mean...Read more
Financial Cases on Divorce – The Resurrection of Calderbank...
When a couple divorce, they are encouraged by the Courts to consider other dispute resolution options such as mediation: before...Read more
Help! I’m divorcing but want to protect...
The number of self-employed workers in the UK is on the rise, with almost five million of us choosing to...Read more
Managing Finances When Divorcing
Divorce Day Believe it or not, January is considered divorce season among solicitors and lawyers. There is even a phenomenon...Read more
How the Insolvency Act works in divorce
The case of Hayes v Hayes (2012) EWHC (Ch) (Chancery Division (23.03.12) (unreported presently) is one of the first cases to give...Read more
Self-Help in Financial Remedy Proceedings
One of the first things we explain to clients who are getting divorced is that, when it comes to financial...Read more