Calderbank Offers

Contact
Table of Contents
The Resurrection of Calderbank Offers
When a couple divorces, they are encouraged by the Courts to consider other dispute resolution options such as mediation: before embarking on expensive financial proceedings at Court to settle their financial separation.
Cost Statements for Financial Proceedings on Divorce
If instead, the parties end up in financial Court proceedings on divorce, at every hearing they are both required to provide each other with costs estimates (Form H) and 14 days before the Final Hearing, a more detailed costs estimate (Form H1). These Forms can be found on the Court Service website. They focus everyone’s minds on the costs incurred as the proceedings continue (frequently the costs double between each hearing).
What is a Calderbank Offer?
In financial proceedings at Court, until April 2006, Calderbank offers could be made. In April 2006, Rule 2.71 was introduced into the Family Procedure Rules 1991 (as they then were) bringing in the current No Order as to Costs presumption, later maintained in the Family Procedure Rules 2010. These rules are the framework in which the lawyers, the Judges and the clients must work within the Court.
A Calderbank offer was an offer of financial settlement made “without prejudice save as to costs”. Other than at the Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing, the Judge hearing the case would not be allowed to be told what that offer was. The sting in the tail was where the Court decides the case at the final Financial Hearing (many cases settle before this). If the case fights all the way to a final hearing, and if, say, the husband had made a Calderbank offer to the wife, which she refused, and the Judge awarded her less than the husband’s offer, then she was at risk of paying the husband’s costs from 28 days after the offer was made, on top of her own. This used to put quite a lot of pressure on a party receiving a Calderbank offer to consider it seriously and to be quite confident before they continued their case through the Courts, seeking more.
The Family Procedure Rules Committee Costs Working Group has launched a consultation seeking views as to whether the 2010 Family Procedure Rules should be amended to take into account Calderbank offers as conduct when the Court is considering making an order requiring one party to pay the costs of the other party. A link to the consultation can be found here.
Current position on costs
The current rule on costs is under Family Procedure Rules 2010 r 28.3 This sets out the issues the court should have regard to if it is to make a costs order:
- Failure to comply with the rules, an order or relevant practice direction
- Any open offer to settle
- Whether it was reasonable for a party to raise, pursue or contest a particular allegation or issue
- The manner in which a party has pursued or responded to the application or a particular allegation or issue
- Any other aspect of a party’s conduct in relation to the proceedings that the Court considers relevant
- The financial effect on the parties of any costs order.
It’s not back to the old days
Taking into account Calderbank offers as conduct, is not as “black and white” in terms of costs penalties as the old rules, which provided that (my emphasis): “the court must unless it considers unjust to do so, order that other party to pay any costs incurred after the date beginning 28 days after the offer was made”.
The change would not mean that the general ‘no order’ rule set out in FPR 2010 r.28.3(5) should change or be deleted. The consultation states that “in this way, excessive weight ought not to be attached only to whether one party has ‘won’ or ‘lost’ but proper account could be taken of whether either party has acted reasonably or unreasonably in the course of their negotiations (including those undertaken “without prejudice save as to costs”) having regard to all of the matters to which the court is required to have regard under FPR 2010 r.28.3(7) when deciding whether it is ‘appropriate’ to make an order requiring one party to pay the costs of another party having regard to ‘conduct of the party in relation to the proceedings’ under FPR 2010 r.28.3(6)”.
Resolution
The national member organisation consisting of family lawyers and other professionals committed to the constructive resolution of family disputes has also asked for its members to complete a survey on the matter, a link to which can be found here.
If the spirit of Calderbanks is introduced to the costs rules it will be interesting to see if this leads to the earlier settlement of financial cases on divorce in Court.
Share this article
“Osbornes handle a significant amount of complex, high-value divorce work.”
“The family law team at Osbornes is one of the strongest in London; across all areas of work from international cases, financial and children work, Osbornes is a market leader.”
Speak to us about Calderbank Offers
Call us 020 7485 8811
Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you
Insights from our Divorce LawyersVIEW ALL
- 3.12.2024
Beneficial Interest in Property
What does beneficial interest in property mean? A beneficial interest in property gives someone the right to share the benefits...
Read more - 4.11.2024
Anglo-French Divorce: Jurisdiction Guide
Anglo-French Divorce: which jurisdiction is right for you? It has been a year since we launched our Anglo-French department in...
Read more - 29.10.2024
Economic Disadvantage in Divorce: Can You Be Compensated?
Giving Up High Earnings: Can A Party Be Compensated For Economic Disadvantage? In financial remedies cases, the fact that one...
Read more - 24.10.2024
Can a Declaration of Trust Stand in Matrimonial...
Matrimonial Homes: Can A Declaration Of Trust Of Beneficial Ownership Stand? Resolving issues relating to ownership of the former matrimonial...
Read more - 23.10.2024
When Abusive Behaviour Affects Divorce Financial Relief
When is Abusive Behaviour Relevant To Financial Relief on Divorce? Domestic violence and other abusive behaviours are a contributing factor...
Read more - 25.9.2024
What Happens to Savings & Investments in Divorce?
Divorce often raises important questions about the division of assets, particularly savings and investments. Understanding what happens to these financial...
Read more - 23.9.2024
International footballer fails to comply with financial disclosure
UD v TQ: The importance of complying with financial disclosure Recent divorce case involving an unnamed international footballer is a...
Read more - 20.9.2024
Pension Attachment Order: A guide
Pensions are quite often valuable assets in a marriage. In some cases, they can be worth more than the family...
Read more - 27.8.2024
Pension Sharing Orders
Pension Sharing in Divorce With so many things to consider when dividing up your finances during a divorce or dissolution...
Read more - 20.8.2024
What is pension offsetting?
In this article, we will explore the concept of pension offsetting and how it can play a crucial role in...
Read more - 12.8.2024
NA v LA [2024] EWFC 113: Judge Orders Non-Court Dispute...
Financial Claims: Judges Can Order Parties To Attempt Non-Court Dispute Resolution As was expected, the court has been quick to...
Read more - 1.8.2024
Standish v Standish: Court of Appeal Decision on...
Court of Appeal reduces wife’s divorce award by £20million Dealing with financial matters on divorce can be complex. And...
Read more - 1.8.2024
Matrimonial vs Non-Matrimonial Assets
Matrimonial vs Non-Matrimonial Assets in Divorce During a divorce, people often make the mistake of assuming that everything they own...
Read more - 1.8.2024
What is a Periodical Payments Order?
Periodical Payments Orders in Divorce Throughout the process of a divorce or when unmarried couples with children split up, numerous...
Read more - 1.8.2024
What is a Lump Sum Order?
A lump sum order is a crucial element of divorce settlements that can significantly impact the financial future of both...
Read more - 25.7.2024
What is a Property Adjustment Order?
A property adjustment order is a key legal mechanism used during a divorce to fairly divide property and assets between...
Read more - 14.6.2024
What Happens If You Have a Joint Mortgage...
Understanding whether you can keep a joint mortgage after divorce is crucial, especially if both parties are still liable for...
Read more - 10.6.2024
What is Financial Disclosure in Divorce?
Introduction to divorce financial disclosure A divorce ends your marriage but it doesn’t end your financial ties to your...
Read more - 7.6.2024
What is a Clean Break Order?
In this article, we will explore the concept of a clean break order, examining its advantages and disadvantages. We will...
Read more - 6.6.2024
Court reduces Wife’s award by £20 million
The biggest “Divorce Cut” in legal history Court of Appeal judges have just made history by reducing the divorce award...
Read more - 28.5.2024
Short-term marriage divorce settlements
A Marriage is a Marriage — Even if it’s short and childless When deciding who gets what in a divorce,...
Read more - 13.5.2024
Impact of extended family wealth on divorce
Can the wealth of extended family affect your divorce outcomes? While there is no fundamental legal difference between a high-net-worth...
Read more - 21.12.2023
Financial Remedy Orders Explained
It is common for disagreements to arise over the finances during a divorce, even if you are on good terms...
Read more - 4.12.2023
My spouse is going bankrupt. Will it affect...
Divorce and Bankruptcy In 2022, more than 1 in 10 businesses reported a moderate-to-severe risk of insolvency. More than one in five (22%) of...
Read more