Do You Pay Child Maintenance if Your Ex is Cohabiting?

25 Mar 2019 | Lisa Pepper
flats in camden

Table of Contents

Does cohabiting with a new partner affect child support? – Case Law

The case X v Y (Maintenance Arrears: Cohabitation) (2012) considered the definition of cohabitation. This was a case where the husband and wife entered into a consent order in 2007 which included the provision for periodical child maintenance payments to the wife; the same was to come to an end upon the wife’s cohabitation with a new partner for a period of 6 months or more.

Context of the Case

This is a term fairly often included in consent orders but less commonly ordered in contested proceedings. In February 2011 the husband concluded that the wife had been cohabiting for more than 6 months with her new partner and therefore stopped paying her maintenance. The wife subsequently applied for an order for back payment of the arrears.

Was wife cohabiting with her new partner?

The consideration for the Judge was whether or not the wife was cohabiting with her new partner. The wife’s new partner had purchased a property in his sole name and the wife was living in the property. The wife contributed £50,000 to the purchase price, but the mortgage was in her new partner’s sole name and he was responsible for the mortgage payments. The wife had a tenancy agreement with her new partner and therefore paid rent to him. The new partner retained his own home and did not contribute to the household bills of the wife’s home.

Initial Judgment

In the first instance, the Judge placed emphasis on the case of Kimber v Kimber (2000) which set out a list of relevant factors to consider when deciding whether parties are cohabiting. That case suggested that the factors to consider are living together in the same household, sharing daily life, shared finances, sexual relationship, stability in the relationship, children, intention and motivation and finally the “opinion of the reasonable person with normal perceptions”.  The Judge at first instance concluded that the wife and her new partner were not cohabitating because only 2 of the aforementioned relevant factors applied.

Appeal and Reversal

The husband appealed and it was held that the wife was cohabiting. This decision was made on the basis that the factors set out in Kimber v Kimber (2000) should not be used as an exhaustive checklist, but rather the Judge’s role is to look at all the evidence before them and come to a “common sense decision”. Each case is fact specific and therefore “there can be no cut and dry test” when considering whether a couple is cohabiting.

Final Decision

On appeal, it was decided that the wife was dependent on her new partner and that the wife’s partner had made a considerable financial contribution to the wife and her children.

Implications for Form E

Each party has an obligation in their Form E to outline their position in respect of cohabitation and remarriage and there is an obligation to provide details of the new partner’s financial situation within Form E. Many argue that cohabitation should have a greater impact on the financial claims of the cohabiting party, however, at present, the current authority states that cohabitation does not equate to remarriage which would terminate financial obligation. Therefore until there is legislative change cohabitation with a new partner can only constitute a change under s. 31(7) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 or possibly conduct which would be inequitable to disregard under s. 25(2)(g) Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.

Judicial Discretion

Cohabitation is ultimately a matter for each Judge to consider in each case and use their discretion as to how much weight the cohabitation will have on the financial outcome of the case. What is obvious is that cohabitation is not an absolute bar to continued spousal maintenance and it does not provide an automatic entitlement to the non-cohabiting spouse to a greater share of the capital.

How we can help

If you are dealing with issues of cohabitation and maintenance payments, or need advice on how cohabitation can affect your financial rights, contact our experienced family lawyers today.

To speak with one of our solicitors, contact us by:

  • Filling in our online enquiry form; or
  • Calling us on 020 7485 8811

Share this article


Contact us today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you

    Related InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. Living together

      Living In a Property Owned By Your Partner

      I live in a property owned by my partner – what are my rights if we are not married? There is...

      Read more
    2. House-Finsbury-Park

      Declaration of Trust for Property

      If you are buying a property jointly, you may want to consider making a declaration of trust to record your...

      Read more
    3. cohabitation agreement

      Cohabitation agreement solicitors

      Unmarried couples who live together do not have the same legal protection as married couples and civil partners when they...

      Read more
    4. little venice in London

      Severance of a Joint Tenancy

      Severing a Joint Tenancy Normally, when couples buy a property together they do so as joint tenants. This means they...

      Read more
    5. camden lock

      Tenants in Common vs Joint Tenants

      Tenants in Common vs Joint Tenants: Which is best for buying a property together? When buying a property with someone...

      Read more
    6. london property

      TOLATA Claims

      What are trusts of land? Property ownership is not always a straightforward legal issue, particularly where the parties are cohabitees...

      Read more
    7. couple

      Common Law Partners: Legal Status & Rights

      Understanding the Legal Status of a Common Law Partner in England Although many people may consider themselves as a ‘common...

      Read more
    8. hampstead house

      Financial Rights of Cohabiting Couples: Case Law

      Introduction to Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29 Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 29 is a decision of the Supreme Court dealing with the...

      Read more



    • Times best law firm 2024
    • Spears 500 logo
    • Resolution-Collaborative-logo
    • resolution logo
    • Resolution-mediator-logo
    • legal 500 leading firm
    • chambers logo
    • I can’t think of anyone who would handle a mediation better than Lisa.

      Chambers HNW 2022

    • Lisa Pepper is extremely hard-working and adored by her clients. She is a very empathetic and approachable lawyer.

      Chambers HNW 2O22

    • She’s an extremely supportive and kind lawyer and has an increasing mediation profile too

      Chambers HNW 2022

    • "She is a phenomenal mediator. She is full of insight and is very creative in her solutions."

      Chambers HNW 2021

    • "She has a substantial amount of empathy which she brings to any mediation and she works extremely hard to gain the trust of people. She fully understands how complex financial disputes work and is well versed in dealing with individuals of high net worth."

      Chambers HNW 2021

    • "The very personable and client-focused Lisa Pepper."

      The Legal 500

    • "Lisa Pepper somehow manages to get parties to settle on matters where there isn’t much hope to start out with."

      The Legal 500

    • "Lisa can handle the large and complicated cases but takes equal care with the smaller cases. She is a highly skilled mediator who is a consummate professional."

      The Legal 500