Reasonableness of Service Charges

flats for service charges

Contact

Shilpa Mathuradas

Table of Contents

Reasonableness of Service charges under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

It is well known that the relevant costs that a landlord incurs in the provision of services, repairs improvements, maintenance or insurance under the terms of the lease must be considered when determining the amount of service charges payable by the leaseholder for a period including those under shared ownership schemes.

The reasonableness of service charges is a key issue in landlord and tenant disputes. Under section 19(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 service charges must be

(1)  reasonably incurred; and

(2) where they are incurred on the provision of services or carrying out of works, only if the services or works are of a reasonable standard.

Objective standard of reasonableness

It is also well known that the “reasonableness” must be determined on an objective standard of reasonableness and not the lower standard of rationality.

The case of Assethold Ltd v Adam and others [2022]

This test was considered in the case of Assethold Ltd v Adam and others [2022] in which leaseholders were issued with a service charge demand which included a sum of £28,000 for the cost of waking watch for the building. From October 2019 to August 2020 surveyors were commissioned by the managing agents to inspect the building for the purpose of health, safety and fire risk assessment. The external walls of The building were not found to present a significant fire risk.

However, in January 2021 a further external walls risk assessment was commissioned by the surveyors who had carried out the inspection in 2020. The surveyors concluded that combustible materials were present in external walls and this presented an “intolerable” risk with consequences of a fire. The remedial action recommended that an extended alarm system or a waking watch be implemented. The freeholder opted for the latter option.

Tribunal considers reasonableness

The leaseholder applied to the Tribunal where the reasonableness of the decision making process was considered. It was stated that where two course of action were available the landlord did not have to opt for the cheapest. The leaseholders produced expert evidence that the freeholder’s action were not reasonable. Relying on this evidence The First Tier Tribunal concluded that the finding in the 2021 report was wrong given the vast difference between the 2021 report and the earlier reports and the freeholder should have commissioned a further report and acted unreasonably in not doing so. As a result they found the costs of the waking watch were unreasonable given that it was based on a report that was wrong.

Appeal to the Upper Tribunal

The freeholder appealed on the basis that the question of what the freeholder should do is  subject to a rationality test. An objective test of reasonableness applied to the price only. The Upper Tribunal disagreed and determined that the landlord’s choice of “what to do” required an objective assessment of whether the landlord had followed a reasonable decision- making process adopted a reasonable course of action.  In the alternative they argued that if the objective standard of reasonableness was the correct test, the First Tier Tribunal had misapplied the same. The Upper Tribunal agreed.

It determined that the freeholder has acted properly in relying on 2021 report as it was from a reputable firm who specialised in fire safety. They also acted reasonably in putting in place a waking watch. The Upper Tribunal stated that the First Tier Tribunal has placed reliance on leaseholder’s expert and had therefore considered the issue with the benefit of hindsight. The First Trier Tribunal should have considered the issues on the information available at the time the costs were incurred and not a later date.

Contact Our Expert Team for Advice on Service Charges

If you’re a landlord or leaseholder dealing with issues related to service charges our property dispute specialists can provide expert guidance on service charges and lease terms.

To speak with one of our solicitors, contact us by:

  • Filling in our online enquiry form; or
  • Calling us on 020 7485 8811

Share this article

Contact us about Service Charges

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you






    • “Shilpa is knowledgeable and helpful. She is not afraid to challenge the boundaries for her clients, with excellent results.”

      Surveyor, London

    • “Shilpa combines the fierce representation of her clients’ best interests with the reasonable and constructive attitude that the Court always looks for in modern litigation. She has invaluable tactical awareness and skilfully handles complex and unusual cases and difficult opponents. As a barrister it is a pleasure to be instructed by her because you so often find that she has already taken the steps that you would have recommended had you been the client’s first point of contact. Her preparation of cases for trial is extremely thorough and helps ensure a positive result before you have set foot in Court.”

      Paul De La Piquerie, Selborne Chambers

    • “Thank you so much for your help. You were efficient, clear and advised me well in addition to being very pleasant to work with.”

      Susan Pogue, London

    • “I would like to sincerely thank you for all the hard work in assisting me to resolve my rather unusual and complicated case. Last 2 years were very stressful and intensive and often only your professional approach and personal realistic but positive attitude helped me not to give up. The uncertainty weight of more than 10 years is off my shoulders thanks to you and your colleagues. Thanks once again for your legal advice, time, and efforts”.

      Khrystyna, London

    • “Mostly I am grateful that Shilpa was understanding about the delays caused by my illnesses, and that she stuck with me and got a good deal for my tenancy. I did feel she fought to protect me and my rights. I appreciate that she kept me informed about progress, sending copies of emails with the other side and consulting me when necessary. I appreciated her eye for detail on legal matters and how she stood firm against a somewhat tricky opposing solicitor.”

      H Banks, London

    • “Shilpa was very thorough in the advice she provided and I was immediately put at ease with her involvement. She works hard to achieve the agreed objective and I very much appreciate her help in my matter.”

      Laurence Dumenil, London

    • “Shilpa was very diligent in her attention to detail and her pursuit of all necessary documentation; she showed great determination in the face of many requests by the other party’s solicitor to let certain things slide. She was thorough and professional which gave us a great sense of security.”

      Oliver Forder, Managing Director, Tank Form Limited

    • Shilpa really helped us take charge of the situation and helped resolve this property dispute. I would not hesitate to recommend her or the team to anyone in a similar situation.

      David A, Trustpilot Review

    • On first meeting Shilpa I was sure that she understood immediately my requirements, and was sympathetic both to my financial restraints and my emotional state. She achieved everything I asked of her and proved to be invaluable, professional and efficient

      P Ashcroft, Trustpilot Review

    • At every step Shilpa alleviated any concerns and stresses we had. Always fast to respond, always professional and super knowledgeable.

      Trustpilot review

    • Shilpa has helped us through some key property litigation matters (residential and commercial) since 2014 and has delivered on every occasion. One particular issue had kept us in a state of stress and tension for almost a decade and after getting in touch with Shilpa she was able to help us bring the matter to a peaceful and successful conclusion.

      Trustpilot review

    • I received a call from Shilpa Mathuradas a couple of hours after filling the enquiry form for a callback. She actively listened to my party wall concerns responding with gentle professionalism, answering my concerns, letting me know what is and is not possible and when best to bring in a solicitor. All this within 10 minutes. Excellent.

      Trustpilot review

    • If I had another reason to have to seek legal advice again, I wouldn’t hesitate to use Shilpa, and would recommend her to anybody who needed legal advice.

      Property Litigation client

    • Shilpa was professional, realistic, and unflappable. Shilpa managed to persuade a reluctant witness to come forward to support my case. She obviously knows her subject very well.

      Property Litigation client

    • I always had full confidence in Shilpa keeping my best interests at heart. I often didn’t understand the legal language, and she would follow this up with a phone call and patiently explain.

      Property Litigation client

    Property Litigation InsightsVIEW ALL

    1. roofs
      2.4.2025

      Significant Damages Secured in Disrepair Case

      Significant Damages for Disrepair secured following breach of Court Order Our client approached Osbornes Law having previously brought a disrepair...

      Read more
    2. Plants
      6.3.2025

      Housing Cases: When Vulnerability Affects Capacity

      When does vulnerability become an issue of capacity in housing cases? Things to consider Many clients seeking housing advice from...

      Read more
    3. properties
      5.3.2025

      TOLATA Claim Settled At Mediation

      Complex TOLATA claim settled after an extensive mediation We recently settled at mediation, a complex TOLATA case involving a dispute...

      Read more
    4. High Court
      30.1.2025

      Osbornes Wins Judicial Review on Legal Aid Fees

      Osbornes successful in judicial review of Lord Chancellor over legal aid fees for Welfare Benefits On 28 January 2025 the High Court...

      Read more
    5. Mental health support
      13.1.2025

      Osbornes Law Secures Mental Health Support for Asylum...

      Home office backs down over decision to deny mental health support to suicidal torture victim seeking asylum The Home Office...

      Read more
    6. building in london
      4.12.2024

      Security of Tenure

      Security of tenure gives business tenants the right to stay in their property after the lease ends and request a...

      Read more
    7. london skyscraper
      4.12.2024

      Section 25 Notices

      A Section 25 notice plays an important role in commercial leases, letting landlords and tenants know what’s next when a...

      Read more
    8. mesher order house
      4.12.2024

      Section 21 Notices

      Guide to section 21 no-fault evictions Evicting tenants is never easy but under the no-fault eviction process, it should be less...

      Read more
    9. pembroke place, london
      18.11.2024

      Rent Repayment Orders

      Guidance for Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) for Landlords in the UK Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) are legal orders requiring a...

      Read more
    10. evicting a tenant
      13.11.2024

      Evicting a Tenant

      How to evict a tenant: Guidance for landlords Evicting tenants is rarely straight forward. It is a challenging and complex...

      Read more
    11. DWP
      7.11.2024

      New DWP Scheme: Refunds for Recoverable Hardship Payments

      Sanctioned Universal Credit claimants may be entitled to refunds of Hardship Payments following announcement of new DWP scheme The Department...

      Read more
    12. property litigation
      16.10.2024

      Managing Litigants: Court Powers and Defendant Options

      How can the court control a litigant? Most people wish to live out their lives without the need to face...

      Read more
    13. Boundary Disputes
      15.10.2024

      How do you determine a boundary?

      Whether the boundary dispute relates to a rear garden boundary or whether it relates to a driveway, the issue of...

      Read more
    14. residential property cornwall
      14.10.2024

      Can You Challenge a Restrictive Covenant?

      Challenging a restrictive covenant! Is it obsolete? It is well known that section 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 allows...

      Read more
    15. Trbunal decision
      7.10.2024

      Disabled Woman Wins £34,000 Benefits Case

      The Background to the Case In 2019 Ramona Cerbu was crossing the road when she was hit by a car and...

      Read more
    16. 2.9.2024

      Transferring a Council House Tenancy to a Family...

      Tenancy Succession Rules The loss of a loved one is always a difficult time. It is important that time is...

      Read more
    17. Redbridge
      30.7.2024

      Single Mother Wins in High Court Homelessness Challenge

      Claim for judicial review against Redbridge Council This case involved a claim in the High Court for judicial review against...

      Read more
    18. House rent
      15.7.2024

      How To Deal With Rent Arrears

      What can I do if I am struggling to pay off rent arrears? There are many reasons why one might...

      Read more
    19. houses of parliament
      16.4.2024

      When can you challenge public body decisions about...

      An introduction to public law Public law governs the relationship between public bodies, such as central government or local government,...

      Read more
    20. asylum seeker
      16.4.2024

      Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children

      Age is just a number? Shining a light on Local Authorities’ Short-Form Assessments of Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking Children A recent report...

      Read more
    21. camden road
      5.4.2024

      DWP Exposed for £32,000 Underpayment of Disability Benefits

      Osbornes Law has assisted a vulnerable client to recover underpaid disability benefits totalling over £32,000. Our client, a disabled young man,...

      Read more
    22. 22.3.2024

      The Renters Reform Bill

      A Review of the Renters Reform Bill The 2019 Conservative Manifesto made a commitment to end “no fault evictions”. This has...

      Read more
    23. 22.3.2024

      Client successful in TOLATA proceedings

      The case related to proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (“TOLATA”) in respect of joint...

      Read more
    24. Small block of flats in London
      23.1.2024

      Case Reiterates Local Authorities should follow Allocation Scheme

      R (on the application of Kukhtyak) -v- London Borough of Hounslow [2023] EWHC 2914 (Admin) This sad case concerned an elderly couple...

      Read more

    VIEW ALL