Chevron pointing up icon

Civil partnerships: inferior to marriage?

Solicitors in London

News article published on: 20th June 2012

A recent case is asking the European Court of Human Rights to either repeal the Civil Partnership 2004 or grant heterosexual couples access to entering into a civil partnership. The following pieces briefly considers the facts of the case.

Statute has made clear distinctions between the requirements for entering into both marriage and civil partnerships.

The Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 states that the parties to a marriage must be male and female, while the Civil Partnership Act 2004 stipulates that the parties to a civil partnership must be of the same sex.

The case however of Ferguson and Others v UK seeks to request that the European Court of Human Rights reconsiders this approach. The case arose after four heterosexual couples unsuccessfully attempted to give notice of their intention to register a civil partnership rather than enter into a marriage, and four homosexual couples also unsuccessfully attempted to give notice of their intention to marry. As a result, in 2011, these individuals made an application to the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicants argue that the combination of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004 create a structure that divides couples into separately but substantively similar institutions, with different names but parallel rights and responsibilities. They believe that this segregation is based solely on couples’ sexual orientation. It is their case that such a distinction affecting  the parties’ Human Rights – in this case the rights to marry in Article 12 of the European Convention of Human Rights and respect for family life in Article 8 – must have an objective and reasonable justification for doing so. Their argument contends that the only reason for maintaining the current system is to use the law to stigmatise same-sex couples as socially and legally inferior, and different-sex couples as socially and legally superior.

The applicants seek a ruling from the Court that those states that have created separate marriage like institutions, such as civil partnerships, provide same sex couples with access to the legal institution and language of marriage, and that the Civil Partnership Act is either repealed, or equal access granted to it for heterosexual couples. The application is currently being progressed through the European Court of Human Rights and the Court is yet to make a ruling on this matter.

How Osbornes solicitors can help?

If you would like some advice on the consequences of entering a civil partnership get in contact with one of our family law solicitors who will be happy to have a confidential chat with you.

Similarly you can contact Osbornes family solicitors if you:

To contact us for advice any  family law issue including if you are seeking a divorce.

The family department at Osbornes is recommended and ranked by independent legal directories Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners.  Our specialist family lawyers in London advise on all aspects of family lawincluding divorce law.

arrow pointing down

"Excellent from start to finish in all matters and all times despite complexities of the case"

Personal Injury department


Livery House, 9 Pratt Street, London NW1 0AE
Tel: 020 7485 8811 Fax: 020 7485 5660
DX Number 57053 Camden Town


28A Hampstead High Street, Hampstead, NW3 1QA
Tel: 020 7485 8811 Fax: 020 7485 5660

Your Privacy | Cookies Policy

Contact a Lawyer

Enter your details below to receive a call from Osbornes:

    Request Callback