NHS Plans To Centralise Patient Medical Data Cause Privacy Concerns

9 Jun 2021 | Nicholas Leahy

Recent news coverage has highlighted the growing concern over plans by NHS Digital (which runs the NHS’s IT system) to upload the medical data of 55m patients onto a database which it will share with third parties. The medical data (which will include anonymised mental and sexual health data, criminal records, and more sensitive information) will be drawn from all patients registered with a GP clinic.

Whilst the data will be anonymised, with patient identifiers being replaced with unique codes, the NHS will be able to unlock the personal data to which the records relate ““in certain circumstances, and where there is a valid legal reason”, something which has caused much concern amongst privacy campaigners and lawyers.

The new system will be known as the General Practice Data for Planning and Research (GPDPR), which sounds remarkably similar to the GDPR, or UK GDPR as it is now, and makes one wonder whether this was done on purpose to falsely reassure people that the changes are not anything new. The new plans will be implemented from 1 July 2021.

Opt Out

The NHS, and the Government, have sought to minimise the above by pointing out that anyone has the right to opt out of the plans, providing that they do so by completing the relevant form and taking it to their GP practice by 23 June 2021. Patients who miss this deadline can still opt out, but their opt out will then only apply to future medical information and not to that which will have already been uploaded.

However the problem is that the public are largely unaware of the above plans, despite the plans being published on the NHS Digital website and being advertised in flyers in GP practices (many patients will not have been in to their GP practice in the past year due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic).

Indeed, the Financial Times recently reported Phil Booth, founder of advocacy group MedConfidential as saying “They’re trying to sneak it out, they are giving you six weeks nominally and if you do not act based on web pages on the NHS digital site and some YouTube videos and a few tweets, your entire GP history could have been scraped, never to be deleted.”

The plans have also led to much concern and resistance from GPs, not least because the relationship between a patient and a GP is one built on trust and the automatic sharing of personal data will undermine this relationship. Notably, senior doctors in NHS North East London clinical commissioning group have called on about 100 GP surgeries in their area to withhold patient data from the new system until they are satisfied that patients have had enough time to consider the new plans. They rightly want patients to have the choice as to whether their personal data is shared in this way, and the time to consider such a decision.

Consent

This naturally leads us to consider the legality of the above plans. Privacy lawyers have aired their concerns recently in the press and it would appear on a deeper consideration of the law in this area that the plans are dubious from a legal standpoint, given that very few (if any) of the 55m patients will have given their explicit consent to the sharing of this data.

A campaign group for digital rights called Foxglove has written a letter to the Department of Health and Social Care, questioning the lawfulness of the plans under current data protection legislation, and threatening further legal action in this regard.

The Department of Health and Social Care is likely to try and rely on Article 6 of the GDPR, which allows data processing without patient consent for a number of reasons such as it being necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the data controller is subject, or necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the data controller. Indeed, the Department has already stated that its plans have not been objected to by the Information Commissioner’s Office, and that it would soon produce a data protection impact assessment of the plans.

However there are arguments to be made that patients’ privacy is under threat as a result of these plans and groups such as Foxglove have pledged to continue to challenge the government, at least until the plans are properly explained and informed consent has been given (or withheld) by patients.

In the information age the sharing of often sensitive information will become more commonplace and this area is definitely a legal battleground of the future. It will be interesting to watch how the law develops in this area as it seeks to find a balance between the rights of patients and the need for the sharing of data to improve public health and policy outcomes.

If your personal data, including your private medical information, has been processed or given to a third party without your consent, then you may have a claim against the individual or organisation that processed your data. Our team have experience of dealing with cases of this nature so if you would like to discuss your issue further please call us or e-mail Nicholas Leahy

Follow link to read article in the Law Gazette on 17/06/2021

Share this article

Contact

  • Stephanie has developed a particularly strong reputation for her handling of birth injury claims, as well as cases concerning surgical negligence and delays in surgery.

    Chambers UK

  • "An excellent firm which achieves fantastic outcomes for clients."

    Legal 500 2021

  • "Stephanie Prior takes on complex cases and gets excellent results. She has a background in medicine which serves her clients well and is a realistic but tough litigator."

    Legal 500 2021

  • "Stephanie Prior is hugely dedicated, adored by her clients, tenacious, efficient and extremely knowledgeable."

    Legal 500 2021

  • "Stephanie Prior is very good with troubled clients and is easily able to make them feel at ease."

    Legal 500 2021

  • "Stephanie shows sensitivity and deals with things in an understanding way."

    Chambers UK 2021

  • Osbornes provides a very intimate and personal client service which is increasingly rare in this sector.

    Legal 500 2020 - Clinical Negligence

  • The lawyers in the team are highly experienced and will drive cases very hard on behalf of their clients.

    Legal 500 2020 - Clinical Negligence

  • "Stephanie Prior has a realistic attitude to the complexities of the cases. She wins the trust of her clients and goes the extra mile to ensure they get the best outcomes."

    Legal 500 2020 - Stephanie Prior

  • "Stephanie Prior... manages a varied caseload, including obstetric claims, child and adult brain injury cases and fatal and non-fatal spinal cord injury cases."

    Chambers UK

  • "Stephanie is experienced, knowledgeable of all aspects of clinical negligence work, and strategic in running cases."

    Chambers UK

  • "The team were extremely professional in putting my needs first. There was a joined-up approach to catering for the client, and all lawyers involved were briefed and constructive."

    Chambers UK

  • Stephanie Prior is always very professional and kind. Highly recommended.

    Medical Negligence Client

  • Quite simply excellent, with a highly competent and well-rounded team. They understand complex medical litigation and have been our lifesavers, and we will always owe them our immense gratitude.

    Medical Negligence Client

Contact Nick Today

For a free initial conversation call 020 7485 8811

Email us Send us an email and we’ll get back to you






    More Insights from Nicholas LeahyVIEW ALL

    1. Neglijenta medicala spital din UK
      23.5.2022

      Justice for client who suffered serious birth injuries

      The Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law have recently negotiated the settlement of a case in which our client sustained...

      Read more
    2. 25.1.2022

      Serious Injury Following TVT Surgery

      Case Summary Our client, SG, attended her GP in December 2015 complaining of urinary symptoms including leaking when she laughed or...

      Read more
    3. 13.1.2022

      Court of Appeal Judgement on Secondary Victim Cases

      Judgment was today handed down by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Paul v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Foundation...

      Read more
    4. 12.1.2022

      Wrongful birth claim successfully settled

      Background Our client, J, fell pregnant in October 2015 and took the difficult decision to undergo a termination. She booked an...

      Read more
    5. blood test capsules
      29.10.2021

      Medical Negligence Case Study: Iron infusion cannula injury

      Nick Leahy, Solicitor in Osbornes Clinical Negligence team recovered damages for his client who suffered an extravasation injury following an...

      Read more
    6. medical negligence & the diagnosis Sepsis
      3.10.2021

      Sepsis – greater awareness can lead to better outcomes

      In September 2019, I attended the Brain Injury Group’s Sepsis training event in the City of London together with my...

      Read more
    7. 20.9.2021

      Osbornes represent family of NHS employee

      Osbornes Law is representing the family of a former NHS employee who suffered a painful death due to negligent hospital...

      Read more
    8. hospital bed
      20.7.2021

      Osbornes Successfully Settle Wrongful Birth Claim

      Nicholas Leahy, clinical negligence lawyer at Osbornes Law has recently negotiated the successful settlement of a wrongful birth case. Our...

      Read more
    9. 13.7.2021

      Family In Cardiac Negligence Claim Against NHS Trust

      Nick Leahy, medical negligence solicitor at Osbornes Law was instructed to pursue a cardiac compensation claim on behalf of the...

      Read more
    10. 9.7.2021

      Clinical Negligence Resulting in Death – Legal Options to...

      The loss of a loved one is an extremely distressing time for their family, made even more distressing if there...

      Read more
    11. white lilies
      1.7.2021

      Stillbirth following water birth at home

      Nicholas Leahy acted for a young woman who had a water birth at home and two midwives were allocated to...

      Read more
    12. 23.6.2021

      NHS Plans To Centralise Patient Medical Data Cause...

      Recent news coverage has highlighted the growing concern over plans by NHS Digital (which runs the NHS’s IT system)...

      Read more
    13. hospital signs
      18.5.2021

      Failure to diagnose and treat Ogilvie’s syndrome

      Our client  suffered the consequences of a delayed diagnosis of Ogilvie’s syndrome following the birth of her daughter by...

      Read more
    14. 18.5.2021

      Failed to identify nerve damage caused during operation

      The Clinical Negligence team at Osbornes Law have this week successfully negotiated the settlement of a case in which our...

      Read more
    15. 26.4.2021

      Elderly man dies after fall from hospital bed

      A hospital trust has apologised after a vulnerable 84-year-old man died due to negligence after he fell out of bed...

      Read more
    16. white rose
      24.4.2020

      Bereavement Damages Award and hopes for wider change

      Serious injury and negligence lawyers have for a long time complained that the level of bereavement damages, which was until...

      Read more
    17. doctor
      7.2.2020

      Why safety improvements for the placement of nasogastric...

      The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch has this month launched an investigation looking at the implementation of safety improvements for the...

      Read more
    18. 17.1.2020

      Inquest held for former cab driver

      A former black cab driver starved himself to death in hospital after being allowed to refuse food and drink despite...

      Read more
    19. clouds
      13.11.2019

      Fatal Claim against West London NHS Trust

      I recently acted in a claim for a fatality against West London NHS Trust for damages under the Law Reform (...

      Read more
    20. 22.5.2019

      Bereavement Award

      A Historic Decision In the case of Smith v Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & Ors (Rev 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 1916,...

      Read more
    21. 25.4.2019

      Brain injured woman awarded seven figure damages

      Our client, a 76 year old woman, tripped and fell on some stairs when she was on her way out of...

      Read more
    22. 25.3.2019

      Cosmetic surgery advice to consider

      Ten years ago I acted for a lady who had chosen to have cosmetic surgery to reduce the bags around...

      Read more
    23. ambulance
      22.4.2015

      Bowel Cancer need not be a killer

      Cancer is a word that attracts stigma. Many people believe that if you are diagnosed with cancer you are going...

      Read more

    VIEW ALL